Literature DB >> 3803170

Macular electroretinograms and contrast sensitivity as sensitive detectors of early maculopathy.

F A Billson.   

Abstract

Eighteen patients with early maculopathies of various etiologies were tested with pattern and focal electroretinograms (macular ERGs), with high (400 cd/M2) and moderate (40 cd/M2) stimulus intensities and a four-alternative forced choice (4AFC) contrast sensitivity test in addition to intensive clinical examinations. High spatial frequency contrast sensitivity loss on the 4AFC test was the most striking and consistent feature of all cases. The only eyes not outside normal contrast sensitivity limits were three in which diagnosis was uncertain and the patients had not recognized any problem, including two marginal solar burns. Maculopathy also substantially reduced macular ERG amplitudes. Criterion scores on these tests separated patients from normals more effectively than other noninvasive procedures and only missed one eye detected by contrast sensitivity. Latencies were affected but the delays were of no clinical significance in the individual case. Stimulus intensity was not critical. The results indicate that contrast sensitivity testing and macular ERGs are very reliable indices of central visual dysfunction at a stage when visible macular changes are too subtle for confident diagnosis. Contrast sensitivity has appeal because of its reliability, objectivity, simplicity, and noninvasive nature. It is equally applicable to children and adults. Pattern and focal ERGs can establish that the visual deficit has a retinal origin and can provide the most reliable objective confirmation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3803170     DOI: 10.1007/bf00220232

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0012-4486            Impact factor:   2.379


  20 in total

1.  The spatial properties of the human electroretinogram.

Authors:  G S Brindley; G Westheimer
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1965-08       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Human pattern-evoked electroretinogram.

Authors:  R F Hess; C L Baker
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Pattern-evoked responses and luminance-evoked responses in the human electroretinogram.

Authors:  M Korth
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  The threshold contrast sensitivity function in strabismic amblyopia: evidence for a two type classification.

Authors:  R F Hess; E R Howell
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1977       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Foveal electroretinogram as a clinical test.

Authors:  G B Arden; J L Bankes
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1966-12       Impact factor: 4.638

6.  Optical and retinal factors affecting visual resolution.

Authors:  F W Campbell; D G Green
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1965-12       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  A simple grating test for contrast sensitivity: preliminary results indicate value in screening for glaucoma.

Authors:  G B Arden; J J Jacobson
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  Vision through cataracts.

Authors:  R Hess; G Woo
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1978-05       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  Electroretinographic responses to alternating gratings in the cat.

Authors:  L Maffei; A Fiorentini
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  A forced-choice test improves clinical contrast sensitivity testing.

Authors:  B L Halliday
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1982-08       Impact factor: 4.638

View more
  7 in total

1.  Evoked responses in patients with macular holes.

Authors:  R G Smith; G M Brimlow; S J Lea; N R Galloway
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  The wide-angle pattern electroretinogram. Relation between pattern electroretinogram amplitude and stimulus area using large stimuli.

Authors:  G W Aylward; V Billson; F A Billson
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  The differential effect of optic nerve disease on pattern and focal electroretinograms.

Authors:  F A Billson
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  Long-term follow-up of an ophthalmologist's central serous retinopathy, photocoagulated by sungazing.

Authors:  J Gärtner
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 2.379

5.  Electrophysiological evidence that early glaucoma affects foveal vision.

Authors:  M S Marx; I Bodis-Wollner; J S Lustgarten; S M Podos
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 2.379

6.  Electrophysiological and clinical tests in dry age-related macular degeneration follow-up: differences between mfERG and OCT.

Authors:  Emilio González-García; Concepción Vilela; Amparo Navea; Emma Arnal; Maria Muriach; Francisco J Romero
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-06-11       Impact factor: 2.379

7.  Simultaneously recorded macular and paramacular ERGs in diseases affecting the central retina.

Authors:  B Bagolini; V Porciatti; B Falsini; G Scalia; E Merendino
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1988 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.