Literature DB >> 29881186

Timing of complications following posterior cervical fusion.

J Mason DePasse1, Wesley Durand2, Adam E M Eltorai2, Mark A Palumbo3, Alan H Daniels3.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study.
OBJECTIVE: To characterize the timing of complications after posterior cervical fusion. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Understanding the expected timing of postoperative complications facilitates early diagnosis of potential adverse events and is important for optimizing postoperative care. Though studies have examined the incidence of complications after posterior cervical fusion, no study has characterized the timing of these complications.
METHODS: Patient data in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) dataset with a primary CPT code 22600, corresponding to posterior cervical fusion, was analyzed for demographics, comorbidities, and ten specific complications. Complication timing was assessed, and univariate analysis was performed to investigate the relationship of patient demographic and clinical variables on the development of postoperative complications.
RESULTS: A total of 2517 patients with a mean age of 59.3 ± 12.5 met inclusion criteria. The overall complication rate was 12.4%. The median day of diagnosis and interquartile range for each complication was: blood transfusion (0.0, 0-0), myocardial infarction (3, 2-7), reintubation (3, 1-9), pneumonia (4, 3-10), deep venous thrombosis (7, 5-16), urinary tract infection (11.5, 5-17.5), sepsis (14, 7-20), pulmonary embolism (14, 8-21), surgical site infection (15, 9-21), and wound dehiscence (15.5, 9-25). Less than 50% deep venous thromboses were diagnosed before discharge, and less than 30% of pulmonary emboli were diagnosed before discharge. On univariate analysis, increased age, decreased functional status, fusing more than one level, current smoker status, diabetes, and CHF were associated with increased complications.
CONCLUSIONS: This timing data is useful to the practicing spine surgeon as it provides a guide for when to expect and investigate for specific complications after posterior cervical procedures. It may aid in the early diagnosis of complications and may also assist in healthcare reimbursement negotiations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical fusion; Cervical spine; Complications; Myocardial infarction; Pulmonary embolism; Reimbursement; Surgical site infection; Timing; Transfusion; Urinary tract infection

Year:  2018        PMID: 29881186      PMCID: PMC5990350          DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2018.03.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop        ISSN: 0972-978X


  9 in total

1.  Risk factors for surgical site infection after posterior cervical spine surgery: an analysis of 5,441 patients from the ACS NSQIP 2005-2012.

Authors:  Arjun Sebastian; Paul Huddleston; Sanjeev Kakar; Elizabeth Habermann; Amy Wagie; Ahmad Nassr
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 4.166

2.  Timing of Complications Occurring Within 30 Days After Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery.

Authors:  Rafael De la Garza Ramos; C Rory Goodwin; Peter G Passias; Brian J Neuman; Khaled M Kebaish; Virginie Lafage; Frank Schwab; Daniel M Sciubba
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2017-03

3.  Anterior and posterior cervical fusion in patients with high body mass index are not associated with greater complications.

Authors:  Rafael A Buerba; Michael C Fu; Jonathan N Grauer
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 4.166

4.  Wind, water, wound, walk--do the data deliver the dictum?

Authors:  Elizabeth M Sonnenberg; Caroline E Reinke; Edmund K Bartlett; Karole T Collier; Giorgos C Karakousis; Daniel N Holena; Rachel R Kelz
Journal:  J Surg Educ       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 2.891

5.  Complications, Readmissions, and Reoperations in Posterior Cervical Fusion.

Authors:  Gleb Medvedev; Charles Wang; Mathew Cyriac; Richard Amdur; Joseph O'Brien
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2016-10-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Timing of Complications After Spinal Fusion Surgery.

Authors:  Daniel D Bohl; Matthew L Webb; Adam M Lukasiewicz; Andre M Samuel; Bryce A Basques; Junyoung Ahn; Kern Singh; Alexander R Vaccaro; Jonathan N Grauer
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Hospital outcomes and complications of anterior and posterior cervical fusion with bone morphogenetic protein.

Authors:  Steven J Fineberg; Kasra Ahmadinia; Matthew Oglesby; Alpesh A Patel; Kern Singh
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Cervical Spine Surgery: Approach-Related Complications.

Authors:  Ran Harel; Petros Stylianou; Nachshon Knoller
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 2.104

9.  Perioperative Complications of Cervical Spine Surgery: Analysis of a Prospectively Gathered Database through the Association for Collaborative Spinal Research.

Authors:  Steven Leckie; S Tim Yoon; Robert Isaacs; Kris Radcliff; Richard Fessler; Regis Haid; Vincent Traynelis
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2015-12-15
  9 in total
  2 in total

1.  Machine learning-driven identification of novel patient factors for prediction of major complications after posterior cervical spinal fusion.

Authors:  Akash A Shah; Sai K Devana; Changhee Lee; Amador Bugarin; Elizabeth L Lord; Arya N Shamie; Don Y Park; Mihaela van der Schaar; Nelson F SooHoo
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-08-15       Impact factor: 2.721

2.  Biomechanical effects of different lateral mass injury patterns on subaxial cervical fracture dislocations after anterior cervical surgery: a finite element study.

Authors:  Junsong Yang; Qingda Li; Peng Liu; Liang Yan; Tuanjiang Liu; Jijun Liu; Qinpeng Zhao; Baorong He; He Zhao; Bing Qian; Yuanting Zhao; Dingjun Hao
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2022-09-15       Impact factor: 3.940

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.