Literature DB >> 27689760

Complications, Readmissions, and Reoperations in Posterior Cervical Fusion.

Gleb Medvedev1, Charles Wang2, Mathew Cyriac1, Richard Amdur1, Joseph O'Brien1.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from 2011 to 2012.
OBJECTIVE: Minimizing the morbidity of posterior cervical fusion can be improved with identification of patient risk factors. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Posterior cervical fusion is an effective technique for treating a variety of pathology. Stability and neurological improvement have been well documented. The increasing frequency of these procedures necessitates further investigation into the factors that may negatively impact perioperative care.
METHODS: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program was queried for all patients undergoing posterior cervical fusion in 2011 and 2012. Preoperative and intraoperative variables were investigated for correlation to complications, readmissions, prolonged intubation, reintubation, and reoperation. A frailty-based score was used to assess preoperative risk. Regression models for prediction were performed.
RESULTS: The study identified 5627 patients of posterior cervical fusion in 2011 and 2012. Of these, 2029 patients (36.1%) had any of our identified complications. Transfusion was the most common in 1482 (26.3%) patients. Excluding transfusion, the complication rate was 9.8%. Prolonged intubation greater than 48 hours occurred in 83 (1.5%) patients. Reintubation occurred in 72 (1.3%) patients. Readmission occurred in 398 (7.8%) patients. Reoperation was necessary in 273 (4.9%) patients with postoperative infection being the most common reason. The frailty-based score was shown to be predictive of any of the above events (P < 0.0001). The majority of patients (54.9%) in the group that had complications was found to have a frailty score of 1 or higher.
CONCLUSION: The predictors for any event included female sex, increased surgical time, combined anterior-posterior procedures, preoperative inpatient status, diabetes, smoking, American Society of Anesthesiologists class 3 or higher, and increasing age. The frailty-based score is a viable option to predict morbidity in posterior cervical fusion.Level of Evidence: 3.
Copyright © 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2016        PMID: 27689760     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001564

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  8 in total

1.  Impact of frailty on outcomes after discharge in older surgical patients: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Yibo Li; Jenelle L Pederson; Thomas A Churchill; Adrian S Wagg; Jayna M Holroyd-Leduc; Kannayiram Alagiakrishnan; Raj S Padwal; Rachel G Khadaroo
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Relationship between smoking and postoperative complications of cervical spine surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Li-Ming Zheng; Zhi-Wen Zhang; Wei Wang; Yang Li; Feng Wen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 4.996

3.  Timing of complications following posterior cervical fusion.

Authors:  J Mason DePasse; Wesley Durand; Adam E M Eltorai; Mark A Palumbo; Alan H Daniels
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2018-03-31

4.  Cost Utility Analysis of Cervical Therapeutic Medial Branch Blocks in Managing Chronic Neck Pain.

Authors:  Laxmaiah Manchikanti; Vidyasagar Pampati; Alan D Kaye; Joshua A Hirsch
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2017-10-15       Impact factor: 3.738

Review 5.  Predominantly negative impact of diabetes on spinal surgery: A review and recommendation for better preoperative screening.

Authors:  Nancy E Epstein
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2017-06-13

6.  Frailty Syndrome and the Use of Frailty Indices as a Preoperative Risk Stratification Tool in Spine Surgery: A Review.

Authors:  Trevor Simcox; Derek Antoku; Nickul Jain; Frank Acosta; Raymond Hah
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2019-06-03

7.  Sex- and Gender-specific Analysis in Orthopaedic Studies.

Authors:  Arianna L Gianakos; Nicole George; Angelica Pinninti; Stephanie Kwan; Dawn LaPorte; Mary K Mulcahey
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 4.755

8.  Comparison of the operative time for open door laminoplasty using titanium plate spacers or hydroxyapatite block spacers: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Takahiro Inui; Koichi Inokuchi; Yoshinobu Watanabe; Kentaro Matsui; Yuhei Nakayama; Keisuke Ishii; Takashi Suzuki; Taketo Kurozumi; Hirotaka Kawano
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 2.359

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.