Literature DB >> 34392418

Machine learning-driven identification of novel patient factors for prediction of major complications after posterior cervical spinal fusion.

Akash A Shah1, Sai K Devana2, Changhee Lee3, Amador Bugarin2, Elizabeth L Lord2, Arya N Shamie2, Don Y Park2, Mihaela van der Schaar3,4, Nelson F SooHoo2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Posterior cervical fusion is associated with increased rates of complications and readmission when compared to anterior fusion. Machine learning (ML) models for risk stratification of patients undergoing posterior cervical fusion remain limited. We aim to develop a novel ensemble ML algorithm for prediction of major perioperative complications and readmission after posterior cervical fusion and identify factors important to model performance.
METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of adults who underwent posterior cervical fusion at non-federal California hospitals between 2015 and 2017. The primary outcome was readmission or major complication. We developed an ensemble model predicting complication risk using an automated ML framework. We compared performance with standard ML models and logistic regression (LR), ranking contribution of included variables to model performance.
RESULTS: Of the included 6822 patients, 18.8% suffered a major complication or readmission. The ensemble model demonstrated slightly superior predictive performance compared to LR and standard ML models. The most important features to performance include sex, malignancy, pneumonia, stroke, and teaching hospital status. Seven of the ten most important features for the ensemble model were markedly less important for LR.
CONCLUSION: We report an ensemble ML model for prediction of major complications and readmission after posterior cervical fusion with a modest risk prediction advantage compared to LR and benchmark ML models. Notably, the features most important to the ensemble are markedly different from those for LR, suggesting that advanced ML methods may identify novel prognostic factors for adverse outcomes after posterior cervical fusion.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complications; Machine learning; Outcomes; Posterior cervical fusion; Readmission

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34392418      PMCID: PMC8844303          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-021-06961-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   2.721


  18 in total

1.  Predictors of 30-Day Hospital Readmission After Posterior Cervical Fusion in 3401 Patients.

Authors:  Winward Choy; Sandi K Lam; Zachary A Smith; Nader S Dahdaleh
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Comparative and Predictor Analysis of 30-day Readmission, Reoperation, and Morbidity in Patients Undergoing Multilevel ACDF Versus Single and Multilevel ACCF Using the ACS-NSQIP Dataset.

Authors:  Austen David Katz; Nickolas Mancini; Teja Karukonda; Mark Cote; Isaac L Moss
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Cervical Spine Surgery Complications and Risks in the Elderly.

Authors:  Kris Radcliff; Kevin L Ong; Scott Lovald; Edmund Lau; Mark Kurd
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Potential Biases in Machine Learning Algorithms Using Electronic Health Record Data.

Authors:  Milena A Gianfrancesco; Suzanne Tamang; Jinoos Yazdany; Gabriela Schmajuk
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 21.873

5.  Efficacy and safety of surgical decompression in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy: results of the AOSpine North America prospective multi-center study.

Authors:  Michael G Fehlings; Jefferson R Wilson; Branko Kopjar; Sangwook Tim Yoon; Paul M Arnold; Eric M Massicotte; Alexander R Vaccaro; Darrel S Brodke; Christopher I Shaffrey; Justin S Smith; Eric J Woodard; Robert J Banco; Jens R Chapman; Michael E Janssen; Christopher M Bono; Rick C Sasso; Mark B Dekutoski; Ziya L Gokaslan
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Impact of surgical approach on complications and resource utilization of cervical spine fusion: a nationwide perspective to the surgical treatment of diffuse cervical spondylosis.

Authors:  Mohammed F Shamji; Chad Cook; Ricardo Pietrobon; Sean Tackett; Christopher Brown; Robert E Isaacs
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2008-09-14       Impact factor: 4.166

7.  Perioperative complications and mortality after spinal fusions: analysis of trends and risk factors.

Authors:  Vadim Goz; Jeffrey H Weinreb; Ian McCarthy; Frank Schwab; Virginie Lafage; Thomas J Errico
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-10-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Timing of complications following posterior cervical fusion.

Authors:  J Mason DePasse; Wesley Durand; Adam E M Eltorai; Mark A Palumbo; Alan H Daniels
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2018-03-31

9.  Prognostication and Risk Factors for Cystic Fibrosis via Automated Machine Learning.

Authors:  Ahmed M Alaa; Mihaela van der Schaar
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Cardiovascular disease risk prediction using automated machine learning: A prospective study of 423,604 UK Biobank participants.

Authors:  Ahmed M Alaa; Thomas Bolton; Emanuele Di Angelantonio; James H F Rudd; Mihaela van der Schaar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-15       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Artificial Intelligence-Driven Prediction Modeling and Decision Making in Spine Surgery Using Hybrid Machine Learning Models.

Authors:  Babak Saravi; Frank Hassel; Sara Ülkümen; Alisia Zink; Veronika Shavlokhova; Sebastien Couillard-Despres; Martin Boeker; Peter Obid; Gernot Michael Lang
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-03-22

2.  Novel machine learning models to predict pneumonia events in supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage populations: An analysis of the Risa-MIS-ICH study.

Authors:  Yan Zheng; Yuan-Xiang Lin; Qiu He; Ling-Yun Zhuo; Wei Huang; Zhu-Yu Gao; Ren-Long Chen; Ming-Pei Zhao; Ze-Feng Xie; Ke Ma; Wen-Hua Fang; Deng-Liang Wang; Jian-Cai Chen; De-Zhi Kang; Fu-Xin Lin
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 4.086

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.