Literature DB >> 31235984

Computerized Adaptive Testing for Cognitively Based Multiple-Choice Data.

Hulya D Yigit1, Miguel A Sorrel2, Jimmy de la Torre3.   

Abstract

Cognitive diagnosis models (CDMs) are latent class models that hold great promise for providing diagnostic information about student knowledge profiles. The increasing use of computers in classrooms enhances the advantages of CDMs for more efficient diagnostic testing by using adaptive algorithms, referred to as cognitive diagnosis computerized adaptive testing (CD-CAT). When multiple-choice items are involved, CD-CAT can be further improved by using polytomous scoring (i.e., considering the specific options students choose), instead of dichotomous scoring (i.e., marking answers as either right or wrong). In this study, the authors propose and evaluate the performance of the Jensen-Shannon divergence (JSD) index as an item selection method for the multiple-choice deterministic inputs, noisy "and" gate (MC-DINA) model. Attribute classification accuracy and item usage are evaluated under different conditions of item quality and test termination rule. The proposed approach is compared with the random selection method and an approximate approach based on dichotomized responses. The results show that under the MC-DINA model, JSD improves the attribute classification accuracy significantly by considering the information from distractors, even with a very short test length. This result has important implications in practical classroom settings as it can allow for dramatically reduced testing times, thus resulting in more targeted learning opportunities.

Entities:  

Keywords:  G-DINA; GDI; JSD; MC-DINA; cognitive diagnosis models; computerized adaptive testing; item selection methods

Year:  2018        PMID: 31235984      PMCID: PMC6572910          DOI: 10.1177/0146621618798665

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas        ISSN: 0146-6216


  8 in total

1.  Measurement of psychological disorders using cognitive diagnosis models.

Authors:  Jonathan L Templin; Robert A Henson
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2006-09

2.  A general diagnostic model applied to language testing data.

Authors:  Matthias von Davier
Journal:  Br J Math Stat Psychol       Date:  2007-03-22       Impact factor: 3.380

3.  Application of Binary Searching for Item Exposure Control in Cognitive Diagnostic Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Authors:  Chanjin Zheng; Chun Wang
Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas       Date:  2017-05-11

4.  A Family of Generalized Diagnostic Classification Models for Multiple Choice Option-Based Scoring.

Authors:  Louis V DiBello; Robert A Henson; William F Stout
Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas       Date:  2014-12-10

5.  New Item Selection Methods for Cognitive Diagnosis Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Authors:  Mehmet Kaplan; Jimmy de la Torre; Juan Ramón Barrada
Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas       Date:  2014-11-13

6.  DINA Models for Multiple-Choice Items With Few Parameters: Considering Incorrect Answers.

Authors:  Koken Ozaki
Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas       Date:  2015-03-27

7.  High-Efficiency Response Distribution-Based Item Selection Algorithms for Short-Length Cognitive Diagnostic Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Authors:  Chanjin Zheng; Hua-Hua Chang
Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas       Date:  2016-09-24

8.  On initial item selection in cognitive diagnostic computerized adaptive testing.

Authors:  Gongjun Xu; Chun Wang; Zhuoran Shang
Journal:  Br J Math Stat Psychol       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 3.380

  8 in total
  2 in total

1.  Improving Accuracy and Usage by Correctly Selecting: The Effects of Model Selection in Cognitive Diagnosis Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Authors:  Miguel A Sorrel; Francisco José Abad; Pablo Nájera
Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas       Date:  2020-12-14

2.  Adapting cognitive diagnosis computerized adaptive testing item selection rules to traditional item response theory.

Authors:  Miguel A Sorrel; Juan R Barrada; Jimmy de la Torre; Francisco José Abad
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.