Literature DB >> 29881065

MIMIC Methods for Detecting DIF Among Multiple Groups: Exploring a New Sequential-Free Baseline Procedure.

Seokjoon Chun1, Stephen Stark1, Eun Sook Kim1, Oleksandr S Chernyshenko2.   

Abstract

A simulation study was conducted to investigate the efficacy of multiple indicators multiple causes (MIMIC) methods for multi-group uniform and non-uniform differential item functioning (DIF) detection. DIF was simulated to originate from one or more sources involving combinations of two background variables, gender and ethnicity. Three implementations of MIMIC DIF methods were compared: constrained baseline, free baseline, and a new sequential-free baseline. When the MIMIC assumption of equal factor variance across comparison groups was satisfied, the sequential-free baseline method provided excellent Type I error and power, with results similar to an idealized free baseline method that used a designated DIF-free anchor, and results much better than a constrained baseline method, which used all items other than the studied item as an anchor. However, when the equal factor variance assumption was violated, all methods showed inflated Type I error. Finally, despite the efficacy of the two free baseline methods for detecting DIF, identifying the source(s) of DIF was problematic, especially when background variables interacted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  differential item functioning; latent variable models; simulation

Year:  2016        PMID: 29881065      PMCID: PMC5978634          DOI: 10.1177/0146621616659738

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas        ISSN: 0146-6216


  4 in total

1.  Effects of the testing situation on item responding: cause for concern.

Authors:  S Stark; O S Chernyshenko; K Y Chan; W C Lee; F Drasgow
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  2001-10

2.  Solving the measurement invariance anchor item problem in item response theory.

Authors:  Adam W Meade; Natalie A Wright
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  2012-04-02

3.  Evaluation of MIMIC-Model Methods for DIF Testing With Comparison to Two-Group Analysis.

Authors:  Carol M Woods
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  2009 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.923

4.  Detecting differential item functioning with confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory: toward a unified strategy.

Authors:  Stephen Stark; Oleksandr S Chernyshenko; Fritz Drasgow
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  2006-11
  4 in total
  6 in total

1.  Bayesian Approaches for Detecting Differential Item Functioning Using the Generalized Graded Unfolding Model.

Authors:  Seang-Hwane Joo; Philseok Lee; Stephen Stark
Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas       Date:  2022-02-10

2.  Differential item functioning and its relevance to epidemiology.

Authors:  Richard N Jones
Journal:  Curr Epidemiol Rep       Date:  2019-05-01

3.  An IRT-Multiple Indicators Multiple Causes (MIMIC) Approach as a Method of Examining Item Response Latency.

Authors:  Ioannis Tsaousis; Georgios D Sideridis; Abdullah Al-Sadaawi
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-11-13

4.  Using restricted factor analysis to select anchor items and detect differential item functioning.

Authors:  Laura Kolbe; Terrence D Jorgensen
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2019-02

5.  Advancing Intersectional Discrimination Measures for Health Disparities Research: Protocol for a Bilingual Mixed Methods Measurement Study.

Authors:  Ayden I Scheim; Greta R Bauer; João L Bastos; Tonia Poteat
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2021-08-30

6.  A multilevel structural equation model for assessing a drug effect on a patient-reported outcome measure in on-demand medication data.

Authors:  Rob Kessels; Mirjam Moerbeek; Jos Bloemers; Peter G M van der Heijden
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 1.715

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.