Literature DB >> 35281341

Bayesian Approaches for Detecting Differential Item Functioning Using the Generalized Graded Unfolding Model.

Seang-Hwane Joo1, Philseok Lee2, Stephen Stark3.   

Abstract

Differential item functioning (DIF) analysis is one of the most important applications of item response theory (IRT) in psychological assessment. This study examined the performance of two Bayesian DIF methods, Bayes factor (BF) and deviance information criterion (DIC), with the generalized graded unfolding model (GGUM). The Type I error and power were investigated in a Monte Carlo simulation that manipulated sample size, DIF source, DIF size, DIF location, subpopulation trait distribution, and type of baseline model. We also examined the performance of two likelihood-based methods, the likelihood ratio (LR) test and Akaike information criterion (AIC), using marginal maximum likelihood (MML) estimation for comparison with past DIF research. The results indicated that the proposed BF and DIC methods provided well-controlled Type I error and high power using a free-baseline model implementation, their performance was superior to LR and AIC in terms of Type I error rates when the reference and focal group trait distributions differed. The implications and recommendations for applied research are discussed.
© The Author(s) 2022.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayes factor; deviance information criterion; differential item functioning; ideal point; item response theory

Year:  2022        PMID: 35281341      PMCID: PMC8908411          DOI: 10.1177/01466216211066606

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas        ISSN: 0146-6216


  11 in total

1.  Assessing differential functioning in a satisfaction scale.

Authors:  W C Collins; N S Raju; J E Edwards
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  2000-06

2.  Examining the Process of Responding to Circumplex Scales of Interpersonal Values Items: Should Ideal Point Scoring Methods Be Considered?

Authors:  Ying Ling; Minqiang Zhang; Kenneth D Locke; Guangming Li; Zonglong Li
Journal:  J Pers Assess       Date:  2015-09-30

3.  Analysis of differential item functioning in the depression item bank from the Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS): An item response theory approach.

Authors:  Jeanne A Teresi; Katja Ocepek-Welikson; Marjorie Kleinman; Joseph P Eimicke; Paul K Crane; Richard N Jones; Jin-Shei Lai; Seung W Choi; Ron D Hays; Bryce B Reeve; Steven P Reise; Paul A Pilkonis; David Cella
Journal:  Psychol Sci Q       Date:  2009

4.  Examining assumptions about item responding in personality assessment: should ideal point methods be considered for scale development and scoring?

Authors:  Stephen Stark; Oleksandr S Chernyshenko; Fritz Drasgow; Bruce A Williams
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  2006-01

5.  Detecting differential item functioning with confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory: toward a unified strategy.

Authors:  Stephen Stark; Oleksandr S Chernyshenko; Fritz Drasgow
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  2006-11

6.  Effect size indices for analyses of measurement equivalence: understanding the practical importance of differences between groups.

Authors:  Christopher D Nye; Fritz Drasgow
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  2011-09

7.  MIMIC Methods for Detecting DIF Among Multiple Groups: Exploring a New Sequential-Free Baseline Procedure.

Authors:  Seokjoon Chun; Stephen Stark; Eun Sook Kim; Oleksandr S Chernyshenko
Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas       Date:  2016-07-28

8.  Evaluating Anchor-Item Designs for Concurrent Calibration With the GGUM.

Authors:  Seang-Hwane Joo; Philseok Lee; Stephen Stark
Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas       Date:  2016-11-04

9.  Item Parameter Estimation With the General Hyperbolic Cosine Ideal Point IRT Model.

Authors:  Seang-Hwane Joo; Seokjoon Chun; Stephen Stark; Olexander S Chernyshenko
Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas       Date:  2018-04-26

10.  Bayesian tests of measurement invariance.

Authors:  A J Verhagen; J P Fox
Journal:  Br J Math Stat Psychol       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 3.380

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.