Literature DB >> 22468848

Solving the measurement invariance anchor item problem in item response theory.

Adam W Meade1, Natalie A Wright.   

Abstract

The efficacy of tests of differential item functioning (measurement invariance) has been well established. It is clear that when properly implemented, these tests can successfully identify differentially functioning (DF) items when they exist. However, an assumption of these analyses is that the metric for different groups is linked using anchor items that are invariant. In practice, however, it is impossible to be certain which items are DF and which are invariant. This problem of anchor items, or referent indicators, has long plagued invariance research, and a multitude of suggested approaches have been put forth. Unfortunately, the relative efficacy of these approaches has not been tested. This study compares 11 variations on 5 qualitatively different approaches from recent literature for selecting optimal anchor items. A large-scale simulation study indicates that for nearly all conditions, an easily implemented 2-stage procedure recently put forth by Lopez Rivas, Stark, and Chernyshenko (2009) provided optimal power while maintaining nominal Type I error. With this approach, appropriate anchor items can be easily and quickly located, resulting in more efficacious invariance tests. Recommendations for invariance testing are illustrated using a pedagogical example of employee responses to an organizational culture measure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22468848     DOI: 10.1037/a0027934

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Psychol        ISSN: 0021-9010


  18 in total

1.  Quantifying 'problematic' DIF within an IRT framework: application to a cancer stigma index.

Authors:  Maria Orlando Edelen; Brian D Stucky; Anita Chandra
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2013-11-09       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Psychometric Evaluation of PROMIS Sexual Function and Satisfaction Measures in a Longitudinal Population-Based Cohort of Men With Localized Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Bryce B Reeve; Mian Wang; Kevin Weinfurt; Kathryn E Flynn; Deborah S Usinger; Ronald C Chen
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 3.802

3.  Use of Information Criteria in the Study of Group Differences in Trace Lines.

Authors:  Seock-Ho Kim; Allan S Cohen; Sun-Joo Cho; Hyo Jin Eom
Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas       Date:  2018-05-15

4.  MIMIC Methods for Detecting DIF Among Multiple Groups: Exploring a New Sequential-Free Baseline Procedure.

Authors:  Seokjoon Chun; Stephen Stark; Eun Sook Kim; Oleksandr S Chernyshenko
Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas       Date:  2016-07-28

5.  Anchor Selection Using the Wald Test Anchor-All-Test-All Procedure.

Authors:  Mian Wang; Carol M Woods
Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas       Date:  2016-09-24

6.  Investigating Measurement Invariance in Computer-Based Personality Testing: The Impact of Using Anchor Items on Effect Size Indices.

Authors:  Iris J L Egberink; Rob R Meijer; Jorge N Tendeiro
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 2.821

7.  Methodological Issues in Examining Measurement Equivalence in Patient Reported Outcomes Measures: Methods Overview to the Two-Part Series, "Measurement Equivalence of the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System® (PROMIS®) Short Forms".

Authors:  Jeanne A Teresi; Richard N Jones
Journal:  Psychol Test Assess Model       Date:  2016

8.  Differential item functioning analysis of the CUDIT and relations with alcohol and tobacco use among men across five ethnic groups: The HELIUS study.

Authors:  Alex P Miller; Edgar C Merkle; Henrike Galenkamp; Karien Stronks; Eske M Derks; Ian R Gizer
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2019-11-07

9.  Differential Item Functioning Analyses of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) Measures: Methods, Challenges, Advances, and Future Directions.

Authors:  Jeanne A Teresi; Chun Wang; Marjorie Kleinman; Richard N Jones; David J Weiss
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 2.500

10.  It Matters: Reference Indicator Selection in Measurement Invariance Tests.

Authors:  Yutian T Thompson; Hairong Song; Dexin Shi; Zhengkui Liu
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2020-06-05       Impact factor: 2.821

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.