Literature DB >> 22610656

Shared pollinators and pollen transfer dynamics in two hybridizing species, Rhinanthus minor and R. angustifolius.

Laurent C Natalis1, Renate A Wesselingh.   

Abstract

Gene flow between hybridizing plant species depends strongly on pollinator behaviour, which affects pollen transfer among floral types and reproductive isolation. We examined bumblebee behaviour and pollen transfer between two hybridizing Rhinanthus species that are very similar in ecology and floral traits. The two species, Rhinanthus minor and R. angustifolius, shared similar pollinator guilds and assemblages, but pollinator recruitment and flower visitation rates were higher in R. angustifolius sites, probably because of its higher reward levels and better visibility. When presented with Rhinanthus flowers, bumblebees that previously foraged on R. angustifolius were less prone to visit R. minor inflorescences, while R. minor foragers accepted both species in similar proportions. Although Rhinanthus has been cited as a case of mechanical isolation resulting from interactions between bee behaviour and differences in stigma and anther placement, we found no support for efficient mechanical reproductive isolation. Bumblebees that foraged on R. minor flowers carried more pollen, but pollen placement on their bodies was similar to that of bees that visited R. angustifolius, and cross-specific stigmatic pollen deposition was similar in both directions. However, the asymmetry in pollinator handling time between the two species, due to dissimilar pollen rewards, may have lowered relative heterospecific pollen receipt on R. angustifolius, suggesting that net gene flow resulting from pollen transfer dynamics is more likely towards R. minor, although this effect remains weak and will be most likely counterbalanced by context-based labile pollinator preference.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22610656     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-012-2346-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  25 in total

1.  Reproductive isolation between two closely related hummingbird-pollinated neotropical gingers.

Authors:  Kathleen M Kay
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.694

2.  Anther evolution: pollen presentation strategies when pollinators differ.

Authors:  Maria Clara Castellanos; Paul Wilson; Sarah J Keller; Andrea D Wolfe; James D Thomson
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2005-12-12       Impact factor: 3.926

3.  Displacement of flowering phenologies among plant species by competition for generalist pollinators.

Authors:  Céline Devaux; R Lande
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2009-05-07       Impact factor: 2.411

4.  POLLINATOR CONSTANCY AS A PRE-POLLINATION ISOLATING MECHANISM BETWEEN SYMPATRIC SPECIES OF CERCIDIUM.

Authors:  C Eugene Jones
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  Behavioral responses by bumble bees to variation in pollen availability.

Authors:  Lawrence D Harder
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Pollinator preference and the evolution of floral traits in monkeyflowers (Mimulus).

Authors:  D W Schemske; H D Bradshaw
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-10-12       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  POLLEN AND GENE DISPERSAL: THE INFLUENCES OF COMPETITION FOR POLLINATION.

Authors:  Diane R Campbell
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  Predicting patterns of mating and potential hybridization from pollinator behavior.

Authors:  Diane R Campbell; Nickolas M Waser; Gregory T Pederson
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.926

9.  Association between floral traits and rewards in Erysimum mediohispanicum (Brassicaceae).

Authors:  José M Gómez; Jordi Bosch; Francisco Perfectti; J D Fernández; Mohamed Abdelaziz; J P M Camacho
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 4.357

10.  Components of reproductive isolation between the monkeyflowers Mimulus lewisii and M. cardinalis (Phrymaceae).

Authors:  Justin Ramsey; H D Bradshaw; Douglas W Schemske
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.694

View more
  6 in total

1.  Safe sites of pollen placement: a conflict of interest between plants and bees?

Authors:  Ze-Yu Tong; Shuang-Quan Huang
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Nectar supplementation changes pollinator behaviour and pollination mode in Pedicularis dichotoma: implications for evolutionary transitions.

Authors:  Ze-Yu Tong; Xiang-Ping Wang; Ling-Yun Wu; Shuang-Quan Huang
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 4.357

3.  Demonstration of pollinator-mediated competition between two native Impatiens species, Impatiens noli-tangere and I. textori (Balsaminaceae).

Authors:  Nanako Tokuda; Mitsuru Hattori; Kota Abe; Yoshinori Shinohara; Yusuke Nagano; Takao Itino
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 2.912

4.  Evidence for asymmetrical hybridization despite pre- and post-pollination reproductive barriers between two Silene species.

Authors:  Jin-Ju Zhang; Benjamin R Montgomery; Shuang-Quan Huang
Journal:  AoB Plants       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 3.276

5.  Both morph- and species-dependent asymmetries affect reproductive barriers between heterostylous species.

Authors:  Barbara Keller; Jurriaan M de Vos; Alexander N Schmidt-Lebuhn; James D Thomson; Elena Conti
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-08-04       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  A European phylogeography of Rhinanthus minor compared to Rhinanthus angustifolius: unexpected splits and signs of hybridization.

Authors:  Jérôme Vrancken; Christian Brochmann; Renate A Wesselingh
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 2.912

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.