Literature DB >> 29134400

Safe sites of pollen placement: a conflict of interest between plants and bees?

Ze-Yu Tong1, Shuang-Quan Huang2.   

Abstract

Plant stigmas and bee pollinators are competitors for pollen. Pollen placed on a pollinator's body can be picked up by conspecific stigmas or it can be collected by the pollinator as food. Hypothetically, one solution is for pollen to be placed on 'safe sites' on the pollinator's body, sites where the pollinator cannot easily remove it, leaving the pollen for stigmas. We compared 14 sites on the bumblebee body in terms of the ability of the bee to groom off fluorescent power, a dust that may be thought of as analogous to pollen. The safest sites were along the midline of the dorsal thorax, the dorsal abdomen, and the ventral abdomen. Next, we counted how much pollen is borne on the 14 sites by bees visiting one nectariferous and three nectarless Pedicularis species. In the four species, only 7, 26, 28, and 30% of pollen found on the bees were on safe sites. Finally, we observed that the 14 sites were contacted by stigmas of the four Pedicularis species; none of the most contacted sites were safe sites. Across all four Pedicularis species, pollen is mainly positioned on sites of the bee body that were beneficial for both the plant and the bee, not on sites detrimental to either of them. Our analysis showed that the conflict of interest between flowers and bees can be solved by cooperation. Pedicularis pollen is placed where it strengthens the mutualism between plants and pollinators.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bee grooming; Bombus friseanus; Buzz pollination; Fluorescent powder; Mutualism; Pedicularis; Pollen placement; Pollen transfer; Pollination; Safe site

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29134400     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-017-3999-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  19 in total

1.  The evolution of mutualisms: exploring the paths between conflict and cooperation.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 17.712

Review 2.  The evolution of mutualism.

Authors:  E G Leigh
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 2.411

3.  Anther evolution: pollen presentation strategies when pollinators differ.

Authors:  Maria Clara Castellanos; Paul Wilson; Sarah J Keller; Andrea D Wolfe; James D Thomson
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2005-12-12       Impact factor: 3.926

4.  Do specialized flowers promote reproductive isolation? Realized pollination accuracy of three sympatric Pedicularis species.

Authors:  W Scott Armbruster; Xiao-Qing Shi; Shuang-Quan Huang
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 4.357

5.  Resistance and tolerance in animal enemy-victim coevolution.

Authors:  Erik I Svensson; Lars Råberg
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2010-01-21       Impact factor: 17.712

6.  Floral isolation in Pedicularis: how do congeners with shared pollinators minimize reproductive interference?

Authors:  Shuang-Quan Huang; Xiao-Qing Shi
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 10.151

7.  Pre- and post-pollination interaction between six co-flowering Pedicularis species via heterospecific pollen transfer.

Authors:  Ze-Yu Tong; Shuang-Quan Huang
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 10.151

8.  Shared pollinators and pollen transfer dynamics in two hybridizing species, Rhinanthus minor and R. angustifolius.

Authors:  Laurent C Natalis; Renate A Wesselingh
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2012-05-19       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Pollen transfer by hummingbirds and bumblebees, and the divergence of pollination modes in Penstemon.

Authors:  Maria Clara Castellanos; Paul Wilson; James D Thomson
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 10.  Evolution of angiosperm seed disperser mutualisms: the timing of origins and their consequences for coevolutionary interactions between angiosperms and frugivores.

Authors:  Ove Eriksson
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2014-12-20
View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Plant-pollinator interactions along the pathway to paternity.

Authors:  Corneile Minnaar; Bruce Anderson; Marinus L de Jager; Jeffrey D Karron
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 4.357

2.  Nectar supplementation changes pollinator behaviour and pollination mode in Pedicularis dichotoma: implications for evolutionary transitions.

Authors:  Ze-Yu Tong; Xiang-Ping Wang; Ling-Yun Wu; Shuang-Quan Huang
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 4.357

3.  Hold tight or loosen up? Functional consequences of a shift in anther architecture depend substantially on bee body size.

Authors:  Rachel V Wilkins; Maggie M Mayberry; Mario Vallejo-Marín; Avery L Russell
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2022-08-21       Impact factor: 3.298

4.  Heteromorphic stamens are differentially attractive in Swartzia (Fabaceae).

Authors:  João Paulo Basso-Alves; Rafael Ferreira da Silva; Gabriel Coimbra; Suzana Guimarães Leitão; Claudia Moraes de Rezende; Humberto Ribeiro Bizzo; Leandro Freitas; Juliana Villela Paulino; Vidal de Freitas Mansano
Journal:  AoB Plants       Date:  2022-09-09       Impact factor: 3.138

5.  Flower orientation in Gloriosa superba (Colchicaceae) promotes cross-pollination via butterfly wings.

Authors:  Ryan J Daniels; Steven D Johnson; Craig I Peter
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 4.357

6.  Pollinator effectiveness and importance between female and male mining bee (Andrena).

Authors:  Ju Tang; Qiu-Mei Quan; Jing-Zhu Chen; Ting Wu; Shuang-Quan Huang
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 3.703

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.