Literature DB >> 29876723

Correlates of Cervical Cancer Screening Adherence Among Women in the U.S.: Findings from HINTS 2013-2014.

John S Luque1, Yelena N Tarasenko2,3, Chen Chen4.   

Abstract

Following the latest update of cervical cancer screening guidelines in 2012, we estimate the prevalence of guideline adherent cervical cancer screening and examine its associated factors among a nationally representative sample of US women aged 21-65 years. Our study was based on cross-sectional data from Cycles 3 (2013) and 4 (2014) of the Health Information National Trends Survey. The final analytic sample consisted of 2822 women. Guideline adherent cervical cancer screening was defined as having a Pap test within the last 3 years. Correlates of guideline adherent cervical cancer screening included socio-demographic and health-related characteristics and HPV/cervical cancer-related beliefs and knowledge items. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to estimate prevalence of guideline adherent screening. An estimated 81.3% of women aged 21-65 years reported being screened for cervical cancer within the last 3 years. Controlling for sociodemographic and health-related characteristics and survey year, women aged 46-65 years were less likely to be guideline adherent than those aged 21-30 years (aPR = 0.89; 95% CI 0.82-0.97). The adjusted prevalence of adherence was significantly higher among married/partnered than among not married women (aPR = 1.13; 95% CI 1.05-1.22), and those with one to three medical visits (aPR = 1.30; 95% CI 1.14-1.48), and four or more visits in the past year (aPR = 1.26; 95% CI 1.09-1.45) compared to those with no medical visits. Differences in unadjusted prevalence of guideline adherent screening depending on women's beliefs and knowledge about HPV and cervical cancer were not significant in adjusted analyses. Lack of interaction with a healthcare provider, being not married/partnered and increasing age continue to be risk factors of foregoing guideline adherent cervical cancer screening.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer screening; Cervical cancer; Pap test

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29876723     DOI: 10.1007/s10935-018-0513-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prim Prev        ISSN: 0278-095X


  35 in total

1.  Increasing cervical cancer screening in a Hispanic migrant farmworker community through faith-based clinical outreach.

Authors:  John S Luque; Dinorah Martinez Tyson; Talar Markossian; Ji-Hyun Lee; Rachel Turner; Sara Proctor; Janelle Menard; Cathy D Meade
Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.925

2.  Papanicolaou smear history and diagnosis of invasive cervical carcinoma among members of a large prepaid health plan.

Authors:  H Y Sung; K A Kearney; M Miller; W Kinney; G F Sawaya; R A Hiatt
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2000-05-15       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Cervical Cancer Screening and Incidence by Age: Unmet Needs Near and After the Stopping Age for Screening.

Authors:  Mary C White; Meredith L Shoemaker; Vicki B Benard
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 5.043

4.  A community-based randomized trial of a faith-placed intervention to reduce cervical cancer burden in Appalachia.

Authors:  Christina R Studts; Yelena N Tarasenko; Nancy E Schoenberg; Brent J Shelton; Jennifer Hatcher-Keller; Mark B Dignan
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 4.018

5.  Adherence to cervical cancer screening guidelines for U.S. women aged 25-64: data from the 2005 Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS).

Authors:  Wendy Nelson; Richard P Moser; Allison Gaffey; William Waldron
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.681

6.  Adherence to Multiple Cancer Screening Tests among Women Living in Appalachia Ohio.

Authors:  Mira L Katz; Paul L Reiter; Gregory S Young; Michael L Pennell; Cathy M Tatum; Electra D Paskett
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 4.254

7.  Changes in Knowledge and Beliefs About Human Papillomavirus and Cervical Cancer Screening Intervals in Low-Income Women After an Educational Intervention.

Authors:  Katherine B Roland; Vicki B Benard; April Greek; Nikki A Hawkins; Lavinia Lin
Journal:  J Prim Care Community Health       Date:  2016-01-13

8.  The influence of marital status on the use of breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Julian Hanske; Christian P Meyer; Jesse D Sammon; Toni K Choueiri; Mani Menon; Stuart R Lipsitz; Joachim Noldus; Paul L Nguyen; Maxine Sun; Quoc-Dien Trinh
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2016-05-20       Impact factor: 4.018

9.  The association between insurance status and cervical cancer screening in community health centers: exploring the potential of electronic health records for population-level surveillance, 2008-2010.

Authors:  Stuart Cowburn; Matthew J Carlson; Jodi A Lapidus; Jennifer E DeVoe
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 2.830

10.  Cancer screening test use - United States, 2013.

Authors:  Susan A Sabatino; Mary C White; Trevor D Thompson; Carrie N Klabunde
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 17.586

View more
  7 in total

1.  Social Inequalities in Participation in Cervical Cancer Screening in a Metropolitan Area Implementing a Pilot Organised Screening Programme (Paris Region, France).

Authors:  Celine Audiger; Thomas Bovagnet; Julia Bardes; Gaelle Abihsera; Jerome Nicolet; Michel Deghaye; Audrey Bochaton; Gwenn Menvielle
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 5.100

2.  Adherence to triage among women with HPV-positive self-collection: a study in a middle-low income population in Argentina.

Authors:  Melisa Paolino; Juan Gago; Anabella Le Pera; Oscar Cinto; Laura Thouyaret; Silvina Arrossi
Journal:  Ecancermedicalscience       Date:  2020-11-10

3.  Sociodemographic factors associated with HPV awareness/knowledge and cervical cancer screening behaviors among caregivers in the U.S.

Authors:  Jiyeong Kim; Melanie S Dove; Julie H T Dang
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2022-08-08       Impact factor: 2.742

Review 4.  Factors promoting breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screenings participation: A systematic review.

Authors:  Federica Vallone; Daniela Lemmo; Maria Luisa Martino; Anna Rosa Donizzetti; Maria Francesca Freda; Francesco Palumbo; Elvira Lorenzo; Angelo D'Argenzio; Daniela Caso
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 3.955

5.  The Relationship between Healthcare Providers and Preventive Practices: Narratives on Access to Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Daniela Lemmo; Maria Luisa Martino; Anna Rosa Donizzetti; Maria Francesca Freda; Daniela Caso
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 4.614

6.  Out of reach? Correlates of cervical cancer underscreening in women with varying levels of healthcare interactions in a United States integrated delivery system.

Authors:  Colin Malone; Diana S M Buist; Jasmin Tiro; William Barlow; Hongyuan Gao; John Lin; Rachel L Winer
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2020-12-31       Impact factor: 4.018

7.  Association of Late Marriage and Low Childbirth with Cervical Cancer Screening among Korean Women: Results from a Nationwide Survey.

Authors:  Hye Young Shin; Bomi Park; Mina Suh; Kui Son Choi; Jae Kwan Jun
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 6.639

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.