| Literature DB >> 29871605 |
Gopal Selvakumar1,2, Charlotte C Shagol3, Kiyoon Kim1, Seunggab Han2, Tongmin Sa4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The interaction between arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (Entities:
Keywords: Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi; Endophytic localization; Plant-microbe interaction; Salt stress; Spore associated bacteria; gfp-tagging
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29871605 PMCID: PMC5989414 DOI: 10.1186/s12870-018-1317-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Plant Biol ISSN: 1471-2229 Impact factor: 4.215
Bacterial strains and plasmids used in the present study
| Plasmid/strain | Genotype or other relevant characteristics | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| Vector for plasmid pFAJ1820 | Xi et al. [ | |
| Helper bacteria containing pRK2013 plasmid | Xi et al. [ | |
| PGP-SAB (Genbank number: KM507143) | Selvakumar et al. [ | |
| This study | ||
| Propagated AMF (Genbank number: KP677599) | Selvakumar et al. [ | |
| Propagated AMF (Genbank number: KP677595) | Selvakumar et al. [ | |
| pRK2013 | Mobilizing plasmid | Figurski & Helinski [ |
| pFAJ1820 | pUT mini Tn5 | Xi et al. [ |
Fig. 1AMF and SAB co-inoculation effect on plant growth and mycorrhizal development. a Plant dry weight, b Leaf proline content, c AMF spore count d Mycorrhizal colonization. T1 – control, T2 - Gigaspora margarita S-23, T3 – Claroideoglomus lamellosum S-11, T4 – Pseudomonas koreensis S2CB35, T5 – T2 + T4, T6 – T3 + T4. Plants were subjected to 0 (0.5 dS/m), 25 (2.5 dS/m) or 50 mM NaCl (4.5 dS/m). Different letters indicate significant differences (P < 0.05) among the treatments at each salt level (a, b, c, d, e, f) or among salt levels for each treatment: T1 (A, B, C), T2 (D, E, F), T3 (G, H, I), T4 (J, K, L), T5 (M, N, O) or T6 (P, Q, R). Each value represents the mean of four replicates ± standard error (SE)
Effect of AMF and SAB co-inoculation on maize shoot nutrient accumulation under different salinity levels
| Salt concentration | Treatments | Total N | P | K | Ca | Mg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| mg / plant | ||||||
| 0 mM | T1 | 819.6 ± 64.3c, A | 68.3 ± 6.8c, A | 470.4 ± 46.3b, A | 40.0 ± 4.9c, A | 32.9 ± 1.5b, A |
| T2 | 1368.4 ± 247.1bc, D | 115.3 ± 11.2b, D | 544.5 ± 50.4b, D | 45.9 ± 7.0bc, DE | 41.4 ± 5.1b, DE | |
| T3 | 1362.9 ± 185.3bc, G | 113.1 ± 9.9b, G | 499.4 ± 74.1b, G | 41.1 ± 6.5bc, H | 42.6 ± 6.1b, G | |
| T4 | 1342.7 ± 101.9bc, J | 133.0 ± 16.9b, J | 597.2 ± 137.8ab, J | 42.0 ± 11.9bc, JK | 36.9 ± 7.1b, K | |
| T5 | 1997.7 ± 311.2a, M | 174.4 ± 15.4a, M | 838.0 ± 49.3a, M | 69.4 ± 5.7b, M | 64.3 ± 3.3a, M | |
| T6 | 1921.7 ± 68.9ab, P | 180.1 ± 9.1a, P | 817.0 ± 57.6a, P | 96.3 ± 11.2a, P | 69.6 ± 2.2a, P | |
| 25 mM | T1 | 808.3 ± 40.5c, AB | 66.3 ± 1.1d, A | 425.2 ± 11.0d, A | 47.0 ± 5.7b, A | 46.2 ± 2.3b, A |
| T2 | 1415.6 ± 96.6ab, D | 101.8 ± 7.8bc, D | 470.1 ± 63.5cd, D | 63.3 ± 8.6ab, D | 58.7 ± 8.2ab, D | |
| T3 | 1218.6 ± 142.3b, G | 98.3 ± 3.2c, G | 566.4 ± 28.9bcd, G | 82.1 ± 13.8a, G | 66.9 ± 9.4ab, G | |
| T4 | 1441.1 ± 133.9ab, J | 129.8 ± 10.5b, J | 617.8 ± 44.3abc, J | 67.3 ± 7.3ab, J | 66.8 ± 5.8ab, J | |
| T5 | 1729.2 ± 117.8a, M | 130.6 ± 5.7b, N | 697.1 ± 77.9ab, N | 75.4 ± 5.3ab, M | 71.0 ± 7.0a, M | |
| T6 | 1765.1 ± 123.7a, P | 161.5 ± 16.5a, P | 757.1 ± 70.0a, P | 87.4 ± 10.1a, P | 78.4 ± 5.7a, P | |
| 50 mM | T1 | 553.4 ± 78.9b, B | 50.4 ± 2.2d, B | 295.4 ± 31.4b, B | 30.5 ± 3.9b, A | 42.0 ± 12.5a, A |
| T2 | 768.4 ± 24.3b, E | 67.8 ± 4.4c, E | 287.2 ± 23.3b, E | 31.1 ± 2.2b, E | 31.9 ± 1.8a, E | |
| T3 | 764.1 ± 71.2b, H | 72.6 ± 2.9bc, H | 274.1 ± 18.8b, H | 30.2 ± 1.3b, H | 50.3 ± 17.8a, G | |
| T4 | 734.2 ± 98.9b, K | 69.7 ± 5.7c, K | 304.6 ± 20.7b, K | 29.8 ± 4.2b, K | 33.2 ± 4.6a, K | |
| T5 | 1066.9 ± 21.5a, M | 87.5 ± 4.1b, O | 352.3 ± 12.2b, O | 50.6 ± 3.7a, N | 46.1 ± 1.6a, N | |
| T6 | 1265.4 ± 170.4a, Q | 110.5 ± 11.6a, Q | 467.4 ± 40.8a, Q | 63.4 ± 10.8a, P | 60.7 ± 8.6a, P | |
T1 – control, T2 - Gigaspora margarita S-23, T3 – Claroideoglomus lamellosum S-11, T4 – Pseudomonas koreensis S2CB35, T5 – T2 + T4, T6 – T3 + T4. Plants were subjected to 0 (0.5 dS/m), 25 (2.5 dS/m) or 50 mM NaCl (4.5 dS/m). Different letters indicate significant differences (P < 0.05) among the treatments at each salt level (a, b, c, d, e, f) or among salt levels for each treatment: T1 (A, B, C), T2 (D, E, F), T3 (G, H, I), T4 (J, K, L), T5 (M, N, O) or T6 (P, Q, R). Each value represents the mean of four replicates ± standard error (SE)
Effect of AMF and SAB co-inoculation on maize root nutrient accumulation under different salinity levels
| Salt concentration | Treatments | Total N | P | K | Ca | Mg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| mg / plant | ||||||
| 0 mM | T1 | 78.8 ± 2.8d, A | 13.9 ± 0.9e, A | 51.5 ± 5.3b, A | 5.6 ± 0.7c, AB | 4.2 ± 0.3d, AB |
| T2 | 165.7 ± 26.1cd, D | 22.1 ± 3.1cd, D | 53.5 ± 7.4b, D | 9.7 ± 0.7c, E | 6.4 ± 0.2cd, E | |
| T3 | 250.4 ± 39.6bc, G | 19.2 ± 3.2de, G | 80.3 ± 17.0ab, G | 17.0 ± 1.7b, G | 8.9 ± 0.8bc, G | |
| T4 | 196.1 ± 18.8bcd, J | 36.7 ± 0.9a, J | 106.1 ± 18.6a, J | 20.9 ± 2.6ab, J | 11.2 ± 1.2b, J | |
| T5 | 303.6 ± 27.5ab, M | 28.6 ± 2.3bc, M | 77.8 ± 17.9ab, M | 21.2 ± 2.2ab, M | 9.9 ± 1.2b, MN | |
| T6 | 384.7 ± 80.7a, P | 30.3 ± 3.0ab, P | 107.4 ± 17.3a, P | 28.1 ± 4.2a, P | 16.5 ± 1.4a, P | |
| 25 mM | T1 | 83.6 ± 4.7c, A | 7.2 ± 0.5d, B | 12.4 ± 3.8c, B | 6.9 ± 1.9a, A | 5.3 ± 1.8b, A |
| T2 | 213.6 ± 42.1b, D | 14.4 ± 1.0c, E | 34.1 ± 3.7b, E | 14.7 ± 1.3a, D | 11.5 ± 1.3a, D | |
| T3 | 206.9 ± 47.5b, G | 16.2 ± 3.3bc, GH | 21.9 ± 4.5bc, H | 25.0 ± 13.3a, G | 8.8 ± 0.8ab, G | |
| T4 | 183.9 ± 14.8b, JK | 20.1 ± 1.8bc, K | 33.6 ± 8.7b, K | 6.7 ± 1.4a, K | 5.6 ± 1.0b, K | |
| T5 | 341.3 ± 33.3a, M | 28.1 ± 2.9a, M | 60.1 ± 10.0a, M | 18.9 ± 1.3a, MN | 11.3 ± 1.3a, M | |
| T6 | 275.5 ± 20.3ab, PQ | 22.4 ± 1.9ab, P | 32.0 ± 2.9b, Q | 12.5 ± 1.9a, Q | 5.2 ± 1.2b, Q | |
| 50 mM | T1 | 62.8 ± 3.0b, B | 4.6 ± 0.7c, C | 5.3 ± 0.9b, B | 2.7 ± 0.3c, B | 1.4 ± 0.2b, B |
| T2 | 139.2 ± 21.9a, D | 10.5 ± 1.3ab, E | 13.7 ± 2.1ab, F | 5.4 ± 1.1c, F | 2.4 ± 0.5b, F | |
| T3 | 127.3 ± 30.3a, G | 8.3 ± 0.8bc, H | 9.5 ± 2.2b, H | 3.5 ± 0.8c, G | 1.8 ± 0.5b, H | |
| T4 | 139.5 ± 19.9a, K | 10.9 ± 1.5ab, L | 18.5 ± 4.9ab, K | 4.5 ± 0.6c, K | 3.0 ± 0.5b, K | |
| T5 | 173.1 ± 22.0a, N | 14.0 ± 1.6a, N | 24.5 ± 7.0a, N | 13.6 ± 1.9a, N | 7.2 ± 2.2a, N | |
| T6 | 134.8 ± 12.6a, Q | 11.8 ± 1.4ab, Q | 16.3 ± 7.3ab, Q | 10.0 ± 1.1b, Q | 3.5 ± 0.6a, Q | |
T1 – control, T2 - Gigaspora margarita S-23, T3 – Claroideoglomus lamellosum S-11, T4 – Pseudomonas koreensis S2CB35, T5 – T2 + T4, T6 – T3 + T4. Plants were subjected to 0 (0.5 dS/m), 25 (2.5 dS/m) or 50 mM NaCl (4.5 dS/m). Different letters indicate significant differences (P < 0.05) among the treatments at each salt level (a, b, c, d, e, f) or among salt levels for each treatment: T1 (A, B, C), T2 (D, E, F), T3 (G, H, I), T4 (J, K, L), T5 (M, N, O) or T6 (P, Q, R). Each value represents the mean of four replicates ± standard error (SE)
Fig. 2Sodium (Na+) and Chloride (Cl−) content in maize plants. a Na+ content in shoot, b Na+ content in root, c Cl− content in shoot d Cl− content in root. See legend for Fig. 1. Each value represents the mean of four replicates (Na+) or three replicates (Cl−) ± standard error (SE)
Fig. 3K+/Na+ ratio in maize plants. a K+/Na+ ratio in shoot, b K+/Na+ ratio in root. See legend for Fig. 1
Fig. 4Gene expression analysis in maize roots by real-time quantitative PCR. a ZmAKT2, b ZmSOS1, c ZmSKOR. See legend for Fig. 1
Fig. 5SAB Pseudomonas koreensis S2CB35-gfp colonization in maize plant roots and association on AMF spore walls. a – control, b – intercellular colonization of SAB, c – Intra cellular colonization of SAB. d, e, f - Claroideoglomus lamellosum S-11, g, h, i - Gigaspora margarita S-23. d and g – Control, e and h – SAB colonization on AMF surface, f and i – No endosporic association. Arrow indicates the gfp-tagged SAB