Han Wool Kim1, Hyun-Seob Lee1, Jun Mo Kang1, Sang-Hun Bae1,2, Chul Kim1, Sang-Hun Lee3, Johannes Schwarz4, Gi Jin Kim5, Jin-Su Kim6, Dong Hyun Cha7, Joopyung Kim8, Sung Woon Chang9, Tae Hee Lee10, Jisook Moon1,2. 1. 1 General Medical Research Institute, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, Korea. 2. 2 Department of Biotechnology, CHA University, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, Korea. 3. 3 Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, College of Medicine, Hanyang University, Seoul, Korea. 4. 4 German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany. 5. 5 Department of Biomedical Science, CHA University, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, Korea. 6. 6 Molecular Imaging Research Center, Korea Institute Radiological and Medical Sciences, Seoul, Korea. 7. 7 Deparment of Ob and Gyn, CHA Gangnam Medical Center, CHA University, Seoul, Korea. 8. 8 Department of Neurosurgery, Bundang CHA Hospital, CHA University School of Medicine, Seongnam-si, Korea. 9. 9 Department of Ob and Gyn, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, Korea. 10. 10 Formulae Pharmacology Department, School of Oriental Medicine, Gachon University, Gyeonggi, Korea.
Abstract
Parkinson's disease (PD) is the second most common age-related neurodegenerative disease in the elderly and the patients suffer from uncontrolled movement disorders due to loss of dopaminergic (DA) neurons on substantia nigra pars compacta (SNpc). We previously reported that transplantation of human fetal midbrain-derived neural precursor cells restored the functional deficits of a 6-hydroxy dopamine (6-OHDA)-treated rodent model of PD but its low viability and ethical issues still remain to be solved. Albeit immune privilege and neural differentiation potentials suggest mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) from various tissues including human placenta MSCs (hpMSCs) for an alternative source, our understanding of their therapeutic mechanisms is still limited. To expand our knowledge on the MSC-mediated PD treatment, we here investigated the therapeutic mechanism of hpMSCs and hpMSC-derived neural phenotype cells (hpNPCs) using a PD rat model. Whereas both hpMSCs and hpNPCs protected DA neurons in the SNpc at comparable levels, the hpNPC transplantation into 6-OHDA treated rats exhibited longer lasting recovery in motor deficits than either the saline or the hpMSC treated rats. The injected hpNPCs induced delta-like ligand (DLL)1 and neurotrophic factors, and influenced environments prone to neuroprotection. Compared with hpMSCs, co-cultured hpNPCs more efficiently protected primary neural precursor cells from midbrain against 6-OHDA as well as induced their differentiation into DA neurons. Further experiments with conditioned media from hpNPCs revealed that the secreted factors from hpNPCs modulated immune responses and neural protection. Taken together, both DLL1-mediated contact signals and paracrine factors play critical roles in hpNPC-mediated improvement. First showing here that hpMSCs and their neural derivative hpNPCs were able to restore the PD-associated deficits via dual mechanisms, neuroprotection and immunosuppression, this study expanded our knowledge of therapeutic mechanisms in PD and other age-related diseases.
Parkinson's disease (PD) is the second most common age-related neurodegenerative disease in the elderly and the patients suffer from uncontrolled movement disorders due to loss of dopaminergic (DA) neurons on substantia nigra pars compacta (SNpc). We previously reported that transplantation of human fetal midbrain-derived neural precursor cells restored the functional deficits of a 6-hydroxy dopamine (6-OHDA)-treated rodent model of PD but its low viability and ethical issues still remain to be solved. Albeit immune privilege and neural differentiation potentials suggest mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) from various tissues including human placenta MSCs (hpMSCs) for an alternative source, our understanding of their therapeutic mechanisms is still limited. To expand our knowledge on the MSC-mediated PD treatment, we here investigated the therapeutic mechanism of hpMSCs and hpMSC-derived neural phenotype cells (hpNPCs) using a PDrat model. Whereas both hpMSCs and hpNPCs protected DA neurons in the SNpc at comparable levels, the hpNPC transplantation into 6-OHDA treated rats exhibited longer lasting recovery in motor deficits than either the saline or the hpMSC treated rats. The injected hpNPCs induced delta-like ligand (DLL)1 and neurotrophic factors, and influenced environments prone to neuroprotection. Compared with hpMSCs, co-cultured hpNPCs more efficiently protected primary neural precursor cells from midbrain against 6-OHDA as well as induced their differentiation into DA neurons. Further experiments with conditioned media from hpNPCs revealed that the secreted factors from hpNPCs modulated immune responses and neural protection. Taken together, both DLL1-mediated contact signals and paracrine factors play critical roles in hpNPC-mediated improvement. First showing here that hpMSCs and their neural derivative hpNPCs were able to restore the PD-associated deficits via dual mechanisms, neuroprotection and immunosuppression, this study expanded our knowledge of therapeutic mechanisms in PD and other age-related diseases.
Parkinson’s disease (PD) is characterized by the selective loss of dopaminergic (DA)
neurons in the substanta nigra pars compacta (SNpc) region, resulting in reduced striatal
dopamine, and accumulations of toxic protein aggregates containing α-synuclein, called Lewy
bodies. Because the dopamine controls movement and coordination, PDpatients experience
various motor symptoms including tremor, bradykinesia, rigidity, and postural instability as
well as dementia and psychiatric disturbance. Dopamine replenishment with L-3,4-
dihydroxyphenylalanine (L-DOPA), an immediate dopamine precursor, is still a routine
treatment so far. However, the pharmacological therapies including L-DOPA and antioxidants
have shown short-term positive effects at early stages, usually require increased drug
dosage, and are unable to block further disease progress. Recently, a stem cell-based
replacement therapy has been suggested as an alternative treatment for recovering the loss
of DA neurons in PD: the cellular replacement of DA neurons with human stem cells has been a
potentially successful for PDpatients[1-3].Many lines of evidence suggest that altered modulation of inflammatory responses is deeply
engaged in diverse neuronal diseases and, in particular, microglia associated
neuroinflammation is a major contributor of neurodegenerative diseases and brain aging[4]. Microglia cells, a type of glia cells derived from myeloid precursors in bone
marrow, are the main brain-resident immunological cells sensing brain injuries and aging[5]. Depending on the environment, microglia cells exist in three distinct morphologies
serving diverse functional roles: amoeboid, ramified, or reactive/activated microglia.
Activated microglia cells undergo proliferation and transformation from a ramified state
into an activated, amoeboid morphology. Intensity of activation stimuli is able to determine
a pool of secreted factors from the activated microglia cells: microglia cells exposed to
weak stimuli secret anti-inflammatory factors and growth factors, and regulate cellular
maintenance and innate immunity. However, either too aggressive or too passive stimuli
induce the cells to release proinflammatory factors or cytotoxic substrates generating
massively detrimental neurotoxic effects[6-10]. In addition, when microglia cells are chronically and excessively activated, they
themselves serve as stimulators generating proinflammatory factors or reactive oxygen
species (ROS) in responses to neuron injuries, and alter synaptic functions and environment,
commonly referred to reactive microgliosis[11]. The chronically activated microglia cells are responsible for persisting
inflammatory activity and chronic neuronal damages in age-related neurodegenerative
disorders including Alzheimer’s disease (AD)[12,13], PD[14,15], and Huntington’s disease (HD)[16,17].The placenta is composed of three layers, amnion, chorion, and deciduas and is an excellent
source of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) because it is discarded after delivery. In
particular, amniotic membrane produced diverse growth factors including transforming growth
factor β (TGF-β), epidermal growth factor, and hepatocyte growth factor (HGF)[18], and expressed various anti-angiogenic and inflammation regulatory proteins such as
angiogenin, interleukin (IL)-1 receptor antagonist, IL-10, tissue inhibitors of
metalloproteinase (TIMPs)-1, -2, -3, -4, growth-related oncogene (GRO), and monocyte
chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1)[19,20]. Furthermore, placenta-derived MSCs can strongly inhibit T-lymphocyte proliferation
and block differentiation and maturation of monocytes into dendritic cells[21,22]. Due to their potentials for immune modulation as well as their low immunogenicity,
placenta-derived MSCs are a very attractive cell source for allogenic cell transplantation:
the hpMSC treatment was reported to inhibit bleomycin-induced lung fibrosis, post ischemiccardiac dysfunction, and bile duct ligation (BDL)-induced liver fibrosis in their animal models[20-25]. Particularly, the amnion-derived placenta MSCs (hpMSCs) with ectodermal lineage
characters are appealing as a regenerative medicine for neurodegenerative diseases[26,27]. The MSCs from first trimester human placenta were reported to be able to
differentiate DA neurons and to recover the motor defects in a rat model of PD, which
suggests that the MSCs from placenta are able to work in the PD model[28]. We recently reported that transplantation of human fetal neural progenitor cells,
which was obtained from 14 weeks old fetal midbrain, restored the motor dysfunctions and
loss of DA neurons in the 6-OHDA treated PDrats[29]. In addition, we showed the hpMSC mediated recovery of memory deficits in an AD
animal model, Tg2576: the intravenously infused hpMSCs were capable of improving spatial
memory function, suppressing amyloid plaque formation, and inactivating microglia in the
aged ADmice by a paracrine manner[30]. Albeit many investigations have proved therapeutic potentials of placental derived
stem cells and their derivatives in neurodegenerative diseases, especially in PD, most of
them have focused on their possible neurogenic effects. Despite the critical influence of
microglia functions on PD pathogenesis, fewer studies have explored effects of
placenta-derived stem cells on microglia associated inflammation and neuronal survival in
neurodegenerative diseases as well as their therapeutic mechanism.Here, we systematically characterized hpMSCs and then investigated the therapeutic
potential and mechanism of differentiated neural phenotype cells (hpNPCs) from hpMSCs in a
6-OHDA-treated rodent model of PD. Compared with the saline and hpMSC-treated ones, the
hpNPC-transplanted PDrat models demonstrated better performances in DA neuron associated
motor tasks for a longer period. In addition, the injected hpNPCs were able to protect DA
neurons in the substantia nigra (SN) against 6-OHDA more efficiently than even hpMSCs via
suppression of microglia and astrocyte activation and production of multiple neurotrophic
factors. Taken together, we anticipate that allogenic transplantation using hpNPCs derived
from hpMSCs are able to restore the physiological deficits of PD through dual mechanisms,
neuroprotection and immune suppression and constitute a new therapeutic strategy for
neurodegenerative diseases.
Materials and Methods
See the detailed information in the supplementary materials.
Cell Culture
Human term placentas (≥37 gestational weeks) were obtained from donors with their
informed consent according to the Institutional Review Board of the CHA General Hospital
(Seoul, Korea). The hpMSCs were isolated from the amniotic membranes of three donors and
then cultured as described previously[30]. hpNPCs were acquired by a following culture method: hpMSCs were seeded as a sphere
form on dishes coated with 15 μg/ml of polyornithine (PLO; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO,
USA ) and 4 μg/ml of fibronectin (FN; Sigma-Aldrich) and then incubated using complete
proliferation medium additionally containing 25 ng/ml of FGF4 (R&D, Minneapolis, MN,
USA) and 1 μg/ml of heparin (Sigma-Aldrich) for 6 days at 37°C with 5%.
Growth Curve and Population Doubling Level
For the acquisition of hpMSCs growth curves, hpMSCs from passages 1–10 were seeded at
5×105 cells/75 T density with culture medium. hpMSCs were harvested and
counted every 3 days. The number of accumulated cells was calculated with the formula for
population doubling level (PDL).
Characterization of hpMSCs
AP staining Alkaline phosphatase staining was performed with the StemTAGTM
Alkaline phosphatase Staining Kit (Cell Biolabs, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA ) according to
manufacturer’s recommendations.Quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction: Total RNA
was isolated from cells with TRIzol (Ambion, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA,
USA). The cDNA was synthesized from 1 μg of total RNA using the Superscript II reverse
transcriptase, as recommended in the manufacturer’s protocol. Reverse transcription
polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was conducted as described in the previous report[29,31]. Primer sequences are shown in Suppl. Table 1.Flow cytometry analysis The phenotype of hpMSCs was analyzed by flow cytometry using antibodies
described in Suppl. Table 2. After the cells were washed, they were then analyzed by
fluorescent-activated cell sorting (FACS) Calibur (BD Bioscience, San Jose, CA, USA)
with the Cell Quest software.Immunocytochemistry: Cells were fixed and permeabilized. The cells were
visualized with fluorescence microscopy or confocal fluorescence microscopy (LSM 510
confocal microscope, Zeiss) as described previously[29,31].Immunoblot analysis: Whole cell lysates were normalized with the
Bradford reagent (Bio-Rad, Hercules, California, USA), and 30–50 μg of the lysate was
subjected to 8–12% sodium dodecyl sulfatepolyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE)
and transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane (Millipore, Darmstadt,
Germany). Antibody information is in Suppl. Table 2. Immunoreactions were conducted
using the enhanced chemiluminescence Western blotting system (Millipore).
Analysis of the Differentiation Potential of Human hpMSCs
We assessed the differentiation potential of hpMSCs during adipogenic, osteogenic and
chondrogenic induction as described previously[32].
Mouse Primary Central Nervous System Neural Precursor Culture, Co-cultures and
Conditional Medium Treatments
Primary central nervous system (CNS) neural precursor (NP) cells were prepared and then
co-cultured with none, hpMSC or hpNPCs as previously described[33]. Briefly, brain tissues were dissected from the anlages of the cortex, ventral
parts of the midbrain (VM) of mouse embryos at embryonic day 14 (E14). Dissected tissues
were dissociated into single cell suspension by pipetting. NP cells were then seeded on
10-cm culture dishes pre-coated with PLO/FN. NP cells were cultured in serum free N2
medium, 1% penicillin/streptomycin with 20 ng/ml basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF)
at 37°C and 5% CO2. Undifferentiated NP cells were co-cultured with either
hpMSCs or hpNPCs. Conditioned Media (CM) from hpNPCs were collected during 3 days of
differentiation without medium changes, filtered and then kept at −70°C until use.
Animals
Female adult Sprague-Dawley rats (220–250 g, 8 weeks old) were housed at room
temperature (22–23°C) in standard 12 h light/dark cycles with free access to food and
water. The experimental procedure was performed according to the animal care guidelines
of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees (IACUC:170027).
6-OHDA Lesions and Transplantation
6-OHDAPDrats were generated as described previously[32]. 6-OHDA was injected unilaterally into right medial forebrain bundle (MFB;
anterior-posterior (AP) −4.4, medial-lateral (ML) −1.2, dorsal-ventral (DV) −7.8, tooth
bar set at −2.3 and AP −4.0, ML −0.8, DV −8.0, tooth bar set at 3.4 (all coordinates in
millimeter relative to the bregma)) at a rate of 0.6 μl/min[29]. The 6-OHDA animal model was confirmed by amphetamine-induced rotation. Cells
(2×1.5×105/rat) or a saline solution were transplanted into two sites in
the brain (coordinates in the AP, ML and DV relative to the bregma and dura (1) 0.07,
−0.30, −0.55; (2) −0.10, −0.40, −0.50; incisor bar set at zero). Cyclosporine A was used
daily to suppress immune rejection.: The experimental timeline is described in Figure 2(a).
Figure 2.
Transplanted hpNPCs restored motor deficits of a rodent model of PD. (a) The
experimental timeline. (b) In the rotation test, amphetamine-induced (5 mg/kg, i.p.)
rotation scores per min exhibited a better performance by the hpNPC-transplanted PD
rats compared with either saline or hpMSC-injected ones. (c) Rotarod tests were
conducted at 3 weeks after transplantation as motor learning tasks. For the short-term
motor memory task, the rotarod tests were performed during consecutive 3 days as
training. In a training course, the hpNPC treatment enhanced memory of motor tasks
compared with 6-OHDA (*) and hpMSC (#) treatment. (d) For the long-term motor memory
task, the rotarod tests were repeated at 6 and 9 weeks after transplantation. Albeit
all animals displayed declined motor activity, the hpNPC-transplanted rats showed
better performance of significance compared with 6-OHDA (*) and hpMSC (#)-treated
ones. (e) Asymmetry score in the cylinder task exhibited improved performance by the
hpNPC-transplanted PD rats. ** and ##, P<0.01 and * and #,
P<0.05 for each comparison. The data are expressed as the means ± SEM.
6-OHDA: 6-hydroxy dopamine; hpMSC: human placenta mesenchymal stem cell; hpNPC:
hpMSC-derived neural phenotype cell; i.p.: intra-peritoneally; PD: Parkinson’s
disease; SEM: standard error of the mean
Tissue Processing, Immunohistochemistry and Immunofluorescence
Immunohistochemistry was performed as previously described[30] on free-floating cryomicrotome-cut sections (40-μm thick) that encompassed the
entire brain. The primary antibody information is Suppl. Table 2. The Vectastain Elite
ABC kit (Vector Laboratories., Burlingame, CA, USA) was used as a secondary antibody.
Tissues were visualized with fluorescence microscopy or confocal fluorescence microscopy
(LSM 510 confocal microscope, Zeiss).
Positron Emission Tomography Analysis
To measure dopaminergic depletion and the functional effects of cell transplantation,
F-18 FP- CIT positron emission tomography (PET) analysis using an Inveon PET scanner
(Siemens Medical Solutions, Inc., Knoxville, TN, USA)[34] was performed at 6 weeks after transplantation as described previously[29].
Behavioral Analyses
Animal models were divided into three groups: Sham 6-OHDA (n = 12),
hpMSCs (n=8), and hpNPCs (n = 12).Amphetamine-induced ipsilateral turning was measured for 90 min at 7 days before
cell transplantation and at 3, 6, 9 and 12 weeks after cell transplantation.The accelerating rotarod test was conducted using an ACCELER rotarod treadmill
for rat. After adaptation to a fixed speed (4 rpm) for 3 min, the rats were placed on a
horizontal plastic rod that was rotating at an initial speed of 4 rpm, and the
rotational velocity of the rod was linearly increased from 4 to 50 rpm within 5 min. The
time that each rat was able to maintain its balance walking on the top of the rod was
measured. This test was performed at 3, 6, and 9 weeks after cell transplantation.Spontaneous movement was measured by placing animals in a transparent cylinder
(height, 40 cm; diameter, 20 cm). Spontaneous activity was video recorded for 5 min. A
total of six patterns of movement (Left Foreleg Touch, Right Foreleg Touch, First Left
of Both Foreleg Touch, First Right of Both Foreleg Touch, Both Foreleg Touch, and only
Raise Upper Body) were assessed by viewing the spontaneous movement of rats. The number
of forelimb steps was measured by two experimenters blind to the treatment group.
Safety Tests
Teratoma formation assay and karyotype analysis were conducted as describe previously[29]. Cells (5×105) were injected into the testis of (Central Lab. Animal
Inc., Korea). Teratoma formation in the testis of 6-week-old BALB/c-nu Sic male mice was
detected by hematoxylin and eosin staining after cell injection (5×105). The
chromosomes were then visualized using G-band staining after cell were treated with 0.05
μg/ml colcemid for 1–2 h.
Statistics
The quantitative results of immunohistochemistry were analyzed using either Student’s
t tests or two-way analysis of variance followed by a least
significant difference post-hoc test (SPSS Version 24.0, IBM Inc., Armonk, New York,
USA). A mixed model analysis of variance procedure was used to account for random
effects in rats. Data are presented as the means ± standard error of the mean (SEM). A
P-value of <0.05 was considered significant.
Results
Stem Cells (hpMSCs) from Human Term Placenta Preserved features of MSCs
Upon karyotyping, hpMSCs isolated from placenta amniotic membranes contained a Y
chromosome, confirming their human fetal origin (Figure 1(a)). As stereotypical MSCs, the hpMSCs
retained a very flattened and asymmetrical spindle-shaped morphology, which is strongly
reminiscent of mesenchymal cells (Figure
1(b)). The hpMSCs were isolated from the amniotic membranes of three donors and
cultured as described in ‘Materials and Methods’. All of the isolated hpMSCs demonstrated
that the number of accumulated cells sharply and steadily increased up to 32 days, and
during a same period, their PDL was sustained without morphological change, indicating the
robust proliferation of the cells (Figure
1(c) and (d)). Flow cytometry confirmed expression of MSC markers in the hpMSCs:
they were positive for the MSC-related surface markers CD44 (94.8±3.7%), CD13 (84.1±7.1%),
CD73 (86.1±9.6%), CD105 (99.8±0.2%), and CD90 (84.0±7.5%), but were not positive for the
hematopoietic stem cell marker CD34 (0.0±0.0%) (Figure 1(e)). The hpMSCs also expressed SSEA-4
(97.0±1.4%) and markers of embryonic stem cells (ESCs), including TRA-1-60 (56.9±19.3%),
CD9 (99.8±0.1%), and TRA-1-81(50.5±17.7%). The proteins Oct4, Nanog, and Klf4 were not
detected and Sox2 was expressed in freshly isolated hpMSCs by immunoblotting, whereas all
four factors were detected in human ESC (hESC) H9 cells, a positive control (Figure 1(f)). Consistently,
immunostaining of the hpMSCs revealed that the cells were positive for only Sox2, but were
devoid of the Oct4, Nanog, and Klf4 proteins (Figure 1(g)). Alkaline phosphatase enzyme activity, a
marker for hESCs, was undetectable in hpMSCs, indicating that the isolated MSCs were not
contaminated with hESCs (Figure
1(h)). In addition to proliferation capacity, their differentiation potentials
into adipocytes, osteoblasts, and chondrocytes were tested: the hpMSCs were positively
stained with Oil Red O for adipogenic properties, with von Kossa for the osteogenic
properties, and with Alcian blue for the chondrogenic properties (Figure 1(i)). Expression of lineage specific markers
confirmed multipotency of hpMSCs: peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma (PPARγ)
and lipoprotein lipase (LDL) for adipogenic differentiation, osteopontin (OP) and MSX2 for
osteogenic differentiation, and type II collagen (Col II) and Cartilage Oligomeric Matrix
Protein (COMP) for chondrogenic differentiation, indicating that hpMSCs maintain key
features of MSCs including proliferation and differentiation capacities (Figure 1(j)).
Figure 1.
Characterization and maintenance of hpMSCs from human term placenta. (a) Karyotyping
of hpMSCs. (b) Morphology of hpMSCs. (c) Growth curves of the hpMSCs. (d) PDL of
hpMSCs. (e) FACS analysis of the immunophenotypic surface profile of hpMSCs. The
hpMSCs were negative for CD34 (hematopoietic and endothelial cell markers) and
positive for SSEA4, TRA-1-60, and TRA-1-81 (ES markers) and for CD9 and CD44, CD13,
and CD90 (MSC markers). (f, g) The protein levels of stem cell makers such as OCT4,
NANOG, KLF4, and SOX2 were measured by immunoblotting and immunostaining. (h) Alkaline
phosphatase staining. The scale bar indicates a length of 100 μm. (i, j)
Differentiation potential of hpMSCs. The following staining methods were employed; Oil
Red O staining for adipogenic differentiation, Von Kossa staining for osteogenic
differentiation, and Alcian blue staining for chondrogenic differentiation. The mRNA
level of PPARγ and LDL were expressed for adipogenic differentiation and OP and MSX2
were expressed for osteogenic differentiation, and Col II and COMP were expressed for
chondrogenic differentiation. The scale bar indicates a length 50 μm. Col II: type II
collagen; COMP: Cartilage Oligomeric Matrix Protein; FACS: fluorescent-activated cell
sorting; hpMSC: human placenta mesenchymal stem cell; LDL: lipoprotein lipase; OP:
osteopontin; PDL: population doubling level; PPARγ: peroxisome proliferator-activated
receptor-gamma.
Characterization and maintenance of hpMSCs from human term placenta. (a) Karyotyping
of hpMSCs. (b) Morphology of hpMSCs. (c) Growth curves of the hpMSCs. (d) PDL of
hpMSCs. (e) FACS analysis of the immunophenotypic surface profile of hpMSCs. The
hpMSCs were negative for CD34 (hematopoietic and endothelial cell markers) and
positive for SSEA4, TRA-1-60, and TRA-1-81 (ES markers) and for CD9 and CD44, CD13,
and CD90 (MSC markers). (f, g) The protein levels of stem cell makers such as OCT4,
NANOG, KLF4, and SOX2 were measured by immunoblotting and immunostaining. (h) Alkaline
phosphatase staining. The scale bar indicates a length of 100 μm. (i, j)
Differentiation potential of hpMSCs. The following staining methods were employed; Oil
Red O staining for adipogenic differentiation, Von Kossa staining for osteogenic
differentiation, and Alcian blue staining for chondrogenic differentiation. The mRNA
level of PPARγ and LDL were expressed for adipogenic differentiation and OP and MSX2
were expressed for osteogenic differentiation, and Col II and COMP were expressed for
chondrogenic differentiation. The scale bar indicates a length 50 μm. Col II: type II
collagen; COMP: Cartilage Oligomeric Matrix Protein; FACS: fluorescent-activated cell
sorting; hpMSC: human placenta mesenchymal stem cell; LDL: lipoprotein lipase; OP:
osteopontin; PDL: population doubling level; PPARγ: peroxisome proliferator-activated
receptor-gamma.
Motor Dysfunctions of a Rodent Model of PD were Restored by Transplantation of
hpNPCs
Neural stem cells or precursor cells have been reported to have therapeutic potentials
for neurodegenerative diseases including PD; the transplanted human fetal NP cells into
rats with PD symptoms were able to rehabilitate their motor deficits and to inhibit loss
of dopaminergic (DA) neurons[29]. However, neural stem cell transplantation in clinical application is impeded by
limitation in securing enough number of cells without ethical concerns and immune
responses against allogenic transplantation. To solve the problems, hpNPCs
(hpMSC-derived neural phenotype cells) were obtained from the spherical culture
condition under FGF4 containing proliferation media for 6 days: compared with
hpMSCs, the cells cultured in a spherical form were more positive for neuronal markers,
Nestin and Tuj1 (Suppl. Figure
1(a)). To induce neuronal differentiation rather than other cells after
transplantation, the hpNPCs were then transplanted into the brain in a rodent model of PD.
As described at Figure 2(a), a PDrat model was generated by injection of 6-OHDA into the right MFB of 8-week-old female
adult Sprague-Dawley rats. After confirming their damage with a rotation test, the
afflicted rats were applied to transplantation with saline, hpMSCs, or the hpNPCs and then
subjected to the behavior assays. First, we measured amphetamine-induced rotational
behavior at 1 week pre-transplantation and at 3, 6, and 9 weeks after transplantation to
assess the extent of motor impairment or improvement. 6-OHDA-treated rats displayed
steadily increased ipsilateral rotations over weeks, indicating that the DAneuron loss
associated motor dysfunctions kept worse. Whereas the hpMSC-injected PDrats showed
increased abnormal rotations to the 6-OHDArats at comparable levels, the hpNPC-treated
rats maintained a lower number of turns of significance at 6 and 9 weeks after
transplantation compared with both the 6-OHDA and the hpMSC-treated ones, suggesting that
the injected hpNPCs mitigated PD-associated motor deficits (Figure 2(b)). Next, the motor memory was assessed by
measuring the latency to fall off an accelerating rod in a rotarod test. This test was
split into short-term and long-term motor memory tests. To measure short-term memory,
motor learning process was analyzed during three training days at 3 weeks after
transplantation.Transplanted hpNPCs restored motor deficits of a rodent model of PD. (a) The
experimental timeline. (b) In the rotation test, amphetamine-induced (5 mg/kg, i.p.)
rotation scores per min exhibited a better performance by the hpNPC-transplanted PDrats compared with either saline or hpMSC-injected ones. (c) Rotarod tests were
conducted at 3 weeks after transplantation as motor learning tasks. For the short-term
motor memory task, the rotarod tests were performed during consecutive 3 days as
training. In a training course, the hpNPC treatment enhanced memory of motor tasks
compared with 6-OHDA (*) and hpMSC (#) treatment. (d) For the long-term motor memory
task, the rotarod tests were repeated at 6 and 9 weeks after transplantation. Albeit
all animals displayed declined motor activity, the hpNPC-transplanted rats showed
better performance of significance compared with 6-OHDA (*) and hpMSC (#)-treated
ones. (e) Asymmetry score in the cylinder task exhibited improved performance by the
hpNPC-transplanted PDrats. ** and ##, P<0.01 and * and #,
P<0.05 for each comparison. The data are expressed as the means ± SEM.
6-OHDA: 6-hydroxy dopamine; hpMSC: human placenta mesenchymal stem cell; hpNPC:
hpMSC-derived neural phenotype cell; i.p.: intra-peritoneally; PD: Parkinson’s
disease; SEM: standard error of the meanAlthough all tested animals ran similar length of time at the first training day, the
hpNPC-treated rats displayed significantly improved performance following 2 days: from
second day, the hpNPC-transplanted rats ran longer time compared with the 6-OHDA ones (**)
and on third day, they exhibited better performance over the 6-OHD and the hpMSC-treated
ones (##) (Figure 2(c)). The
superior performance achieved by the hpNPC-treated rat was maintained up to 9 weeks after
transplantation, although the effects diminished over weeks: the hpNPC-treated animals
carried out running for longer time of significance over other two groups at 6 and 9 weeks
after treatment indicating the hpNPCs were able to improve motor memory (Figure 2(d)). The cylinder
test, another asymmetric behavior task, was performed to evaluate the use of
the impaired forelimb while exploring and rearing in a transparent cylinder. A significant
group effect on the number of impaired forelimb touches was observed: rats transplanted
with the hpNPCs demonstrated significantly increased use of the impaired forepaw arm
compared with the sham group (Figure
2(e)). The restored motor defects in the afflicted rats suggested that the
transplanted hpNPCs have potentials to recover 6-OHDA associated neuronal damages.
The Transplanted hpNPCs Protected DA Neurons Against 6-OHDA Implicated Cell
Death
Recovery of DA neuron associated motor defects by the injected hpNPCs suggests that the
transplanted hpNPCs are able to protect loss of DA neurons. The hpNPC-mediated restoration
of DA was supported by PET analysis that was conducted 6 weeks after transplantation using
radiolabeled ligands for dopamine transporters (DATs): while the 6-OHDA-treated rats,
compared with a normal rat, exhibited reduced signals indicating loss of DA terminal
functionality, the hpNPC-transplanted PDrats manifested partial retrieval of DA loss
(Figure 3(a)). Next, we also
examined tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) protein, a rate-limiting enzyme in DA synthesis, by
immunoblotting to assess the in vivo survival of the DA neurons in the striatum and the SN
after cell transplantation into the stratum of 6-OHDA-lesioned rats. Whereas, it was not
or barely detected in the lesioned striatum and SN of 6-OHDA and hpMSCs treated groups
respectively, TH protein was observed in the lesioned striatum and lesioned SN of the
hpNPC-injected group, indicating that transplantation of hpNPCs, not hpMSCs, were able to
protect TH-positive cells against 6-OHDA-treated rats (Figure 3(b)). The enhanced viability of TH-positive
cells was further supported by immunohistochemical staining with TH antibody for DA
neurons. TH-immunoreactivity (IR) was plentiful in the striatum of an intact site whereas
the decreased of TH-IR was observed on a 6-OHDA injected site. The implantation of either
hpNPCs or hpMSCs remarkably inhibited the loss of striatal TH-IR induced by 6-OHDA
injection compared with the 6-OHDArats (Figure 3(c)). In addition, significantly higher number of DA neurons on the SN
of the hpNPCs transplanted rats existed compared with 6-OHDA treatment rats (Figure 3(d)). The hpMSCs injection
protected TH cells but it was not significant. The significant number of DA neurons was
observed in striatum even at 12 weeks after hpNPCs transplantation (p<
0.05, Figure 3(e)). Taken
together, hpNPCs are able to restore 6-OHDA mediated motor dysfunction via protecting DA
neurons against cell death and hpMSCs themselves have partial potency for recovering
functional deficits of 6-OHDA treated rats.
Figure 3.
The hpNPCs were able to protect DA neurons in 6-OHDA treated rats. (a) PET image
analysis. The 18F FP-CIT PET image with coronal and transaxial slices
showed that 6-OHDA mediated dopaminergic impairment (sham) was partially recovered
after transplantation of the hpNPCs. (b) The hpNPC-injected 6-OHDA-lesioned rats
showed partial recovery of TH protein in both the striatum and substantia nigra at 12
weeks after cell transplantation compared with either saline or the hpMSC-treated
ones. (c) TH-immunoreactivity exhibited that a rich TH fiber network in the striatum
to the lesion after transplantation was lower in the 6-OHDA-lesioned side of striatum.
(d) Immunohistochemical staining and quantification of TH-positive cell bodies in the
substantia nigra. (e) Immunohistochemical staining and quantification of TH-positive
cell bodies in the striatum. ***, P<0.001; **, P<0.01 and *,
P<0.05 for each comparison 6-OHDA: 6-hydroxy dopamine; DA: dopamine;
hpMSC: human placenta mesenchymal stem cell; hpNPC: hpMSC-derived neural phenotype
cell; PET: positron emission tomography; ST: striatum; TH: tyrosine hydroxylase.
The hpNPCs were able to protect DA neurons in 6-OHDA treated rats. (a) PET image
analysis. The 18F FP-CIT PET image with coronal and transaxial slices
showed that 6-OHDA mediated dopaminergic impairment (sham) was partially recovered
after transplantation of the hpNPCs. (b) The hpNPC-injected 6-OHDA-lesioned rats
showed partial recovery of TH protein in both the striatum and substantia nigra at 12
weeks after cell transplantation compared with either saline or the hpMSC-treated
ones. (c) TH-immunoreactivity exhibited that a rich TH fiber network in the striatum
to the lesion after transplantation was lower in the 6-OHDA-lesioned side of striatum.
(d) Immunohistochemical staining and quantification of TH-positive cell bodies in the
substantia nigra. (e) Immunohistochemical staining and quantification of TH-positive
cell bodies in the striatum. ***, P<0.001; **, P<0.01 and *,
P<0.05 for each comparison 6-OHDA: 6-hydroxy dopamine; DA: dopamine;
hpMSC: human placenta mesenchymal stem cell; hpNPC: hpMSC-derived neural phenotype
cell; PET: positron emission tomography; ST: striatum; TH: tyrosine hydroxylase.
The Transplanted hpNPCs Survived and Differentiated into Neurons at the Grafted
Sites
A graft site was easily identified in brain sections followed by immunohistochemical
staining for human-specific human nuclei (HN) marker: the transplanted cells around the
vertical needle tract stained positive for HN (Suppl. Figure 2(a)). The presence of the transplanted cells
was confirmed by fluorescent in situ hybridization against human centromere 17 (CEP17)
within the striatum of hpNPCs group (Suppl. Figure 2(b)). The subpopulation of HN+ cells was
co-immunostained with antibodies against SOX2 (Figure 4(a) 1 and 5), Nestin (Figure 4(a) 2 and 6) and Tuj1 (Figure 4(a) 3 and 7) at 1 and 3 weeks after
transplantation. At 1 and 3 weeks after transplantation, some of the transplanted cells
were co- expressed with doublecortin (DCX) and dispersed in the striatum, indicating
migratory potentials of the injected cells (Figure 4(a) 4 and 8). The HN and TH co-stained hpNPCs
at 6 weeks post-transplantation indicated that the transplanted cells were able to
differentiate into DA neurons in the striatum region at 6 weeks after transplantation
(Figure 4(b)). Interestingly,
the transplanted cells were able to differentiate into other types of neurons at 12 weeks
after transplantation: some cells were co-expressed with gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)
and glutamate+ cells (Figure
4(c)). To test whether hpNPCs generate teratomas, hpNPCs were transplanted into
testis of severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) mice. No teratoma formation was observed
in vivo at 6 or 36 weeks after injection (Suppl. Figure 3). Taken together, the results showed that
hpMSC-derived hpNPCs were able to survive and differentiate into neurons including
TH-positive neurons without teratoma formation after transplantation into a ratPD
model.
Figure 4.
The transplanted hpNPCs were able to survive and differentiate into diverse neurons
including DA neurons in 6-OHDA-treated rats. (a) Immunostaining of the transplanted
hpNPCs at the grafted sites displayed survival and neuronal differentiation of the
injected hpNPCs. At 1 week (1–4) and 3 weeks (5–8) after transplantation, the brains
were isolated from the hpNPC-treated rats and were stained with multiple neuronal
markers with HN (scale bar: 100 μm): SOX2 (pluripotent stem cell marker, 1 and 5),
Nestin (neural precursor marker, 2 and 6), Tuj-1 (neuronal marker, 3 and 7) and DCX
(migration marker 4 and 8). (b) The transplanted cells were positive for both TH and
NeuN in the striatum region at 6 weeks post-transplantation scale bar is 100μm (c) The
transplanted hpNPCs were differentiated into GABA and glutamate-positive neurons at 12
weeks after transplantation. The scale bar indicates a length of 50 μm. 6-OHDA:
6-hydroxy dopamine; DA: dopamine; DCX: doublecortin; HN: human nucleic marker; hpMSC:
human placenta mesenchymal stem cell; hpNPC: hpMSC-derived neural phenotype cell; TH:
tyrosine hydroxylase.
The transplanted hpNPCs were able to survive and differentiate into diverse neurons
including DA neurons in 6-OHDA-treated rats. (a) Immunostaining of the transplanted
hpNPCs at the grafted sites displayed survival and neuronal differentiation of the
injected hpNPCs. At 1 week (1–4) and 3 weeks (5–8) after transplantation, the brains
were isolated from the hpNPC-treated rats and were stained with multiple neuronal
markers with HN (scale bar: 100 μm): SOX2 (pluripotent stem cell marker, 1 and 5),
Nestin (neural precursor marker, 2 and 6), Tuj-1 (neuronal marker, 3 and 7) and DCX
(migration marker 4 and 8). (b) The transplanted cells were positive for both TH and
NeuN in the striatum region at 6 weeks post-transplantation scale bar is 100μm (c) The
transplanted hpNPCs were differentiated into GABA and glutamate-positive neurons at 12
weeks after transplantation. The scale bar indicates a length of 50 μm. 6-OHDA:
6-hydroxy dopamine; DA: dopamine; DCX: doublecortin; HN: human nucleic marker; hpMSC:
human placenta mesenchymal stem cell; hpNPC: hpMSC-derived neural phenotype cell; TH:
tyrosine hydroxylase.
The Transplanted hpNPCs Expressed DLL1 and Neurturin, and Altered Microenvironment in
the Transplanted Striatum
We next looked for putative factors contributing to hpNPC-mediated neuroprotection.
Because the injected hpNPCs influenced neighboring cells at the grafted site (Figure 4) and DLL-Notch-mediated cell
contact signals are critical in neuronal survival in PD, we examined activation of
DLL-Notch mediated cell contact signals[35,36]. In addition, since neurturin (NRTN) among neurotrophic factors was reported to
protect neurons in PD and regulate Notch signals for protect cardiac progenitor cells,
expression of NRTN was also probed[37,38]. A majority of injected green fluorescent protein (GFP)-tagged hpNPCs expressed
DLL1 and subpopulation of GFP-hpNPCs was overlapped with NRTN positive cells, indicating
that Notch signals and the NRTN contribute the survival of hpNPCs at the graft and their
migration position (Figure 5(a)).
To test whether the DLL1-positive hpNPCs affected their environment by cell contact
signals, the transplanted regions were co-stained with DLL-1 and a human cytosolic stem
cell marker, Stem121. Although hpNPCs were barely detected at 6 weeks after injection,
abundance of the DLL1 positive cells dramatically increased at 6 weeks and then declined
until 12 weeks after injection, indicating that most of the DLL1-expressing cells were
endogenous at 6 weeks after injection and the transplanted hpNPCs functioned through
altering their environment (Figure
5(b)). Next, we examined the expression of DLL1 and its effect on neurogenesis by
immunohistochemistry after cell transplantation. Compared with the sham controls, the
cluster of cells in the graft site were DLL1 positive antibody at 1, 3, 6 and 12 weeks
post-transplantation and Notch target MASH1 and NeuroD1 protein levels increased at 1, 3,
6 and 12 weeks post- transplantation as well. Interestingly, DLL1, MASH1, and NeuroD1
increased on the margin of the striatum in the hpNPCs transplanted PDrats at 6 weeks
after injection, indicating that the transplanted hpNPCs migrated into the margin of the
striatum ad 6 weeks post-transplantation and then modulated their environments favoring to
neuronal differentiation (Figure
5(c)). This result suggested that the injected hpNPCs were well differentiated
into neural or neuronal cells in the host rat brain. Taken together, our results suggested
that the transplanted hpNPCs have potentials to enhance survival of the afflicted DA
neurons by both cell contacts and paracrine factors including NRTN.
Figure 5.
The transplanted hpNPCs expressed DLL1 and influenced environments. (a) The
transplanted GFP-tagged hpNPCs were positive for DLL1 and NRTN. Scale bar is 20μm. (b)
Regardless of disappearance of the injected hpNPCs, DLL1 positive cells were detected
around the graft sites. The scale bars represent 20μm. (c) Immunohistochemical
staining of DLL1, MASH1, and NEUROD1-positive cell bodies in the striatum (scale bar:
50 and 20μm). DAPI: 4’,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole; DLL: delta-like ligand; GFP: green
fluorescent protein; hpMSC: human placenta mesenchymal stem cell; hpNPC: hpMSC-derived
neural phenotype cell; NRTN: neurturin.
The transplanted hpNPCs expressed DLL1 and influenced environments. (a) The
transplanted GFP-tagged hpNPCs were positive for DLL1 and NRTN. Scale bar is 20μm. (b)
Regardless of disappearance of the injected hpNPCs, DLL1 positive cells were detected
around the graft sites. The scale bars represent 20μm. (c) Immunohistochemical
staining of DLL1, MASH1, and NEUROD1-positive cell bodies in the striatum (scale bar:
50 and 20μm). DAPI: 4’,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole; DLL: delta-like ligand; GFP: green
fluorescent protein; hpMSC: human placenta mesenchymal stem cell; hpNPC: hpMSC-derived
neural phenotype cell; NRTN: neurturin.
Secreted Factors from hpNPCs Enhanced Cell Survival and Neuronal Differentiation as
well as Modulated Microglial Activation in Mouse NP Cells Culture
Recent studies demonstrated that diffusible factors secreted from the transplanted MSCs
induced neurogenesis and neuroprotection, and modulated microglial activation, called
paracrine activity[39-41]. To test whether the paracrine factors released from hpNPCs promote survival and
neuronal differentiation of neighboring precursors, undifferentiated mouse NPCs from
either cortex or ventral midbrain were co-cultured with either hpMSCs or hpNPCs under
differentiation condition[33] and then apoptotic nuclei containing apoptotic cells were measured at
differentiation day 14. As shown Figure
6(a–b), all co-cultured NPCs from both cortex and midbrain displayed remarkable
reduction in the number of apoptotic cells. In particular, the hpNPCs more efficiently
suppressed cell death of NPCs from midbrain of significance compared with the hpMSCs. In
addition, the hpNPCs were able to induce differentiation of NPCs into TH-positive cells
more efficiently at 7 days after differentiation than the hpMSCs, indicating that secreted
factors from hpNPCs may have attributes enhancing both neuroprotection and differentiation
into TH-positive DA neurons (Figure
6(c)). Immune-modulatory potentials of paracrine factors from hpNPCs was assessed
in the experiment where the activated microglial cells and astrocytes by 6-OHDA were
treated with CM from hpNPCs for 3 days in vitro. After both microglia and astrocytes were
treated with differential concentrations of 6-OHDA (0, 25, and 50 μM), activation of
microglial cells and astrocytes in the presence of CM were estimated by morphological
changes of microglial cells with Iba1-imunoreactivity (green) or astrocytes with glial
fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP)-immunoreactivity (red). Although remarkable changes in
astrocytes were not detected in any conditions, microglia showed profound morphological
changes in the presence of 6-OHDA and CM: both 25 and 50 μM of 6-OHDA-activated microglia,
whose activation was suppressed by CM (Figure 6(d)). For detailed assessment, microglia cells were categorized into six
subtypes according to their shapes, ovoid shape amoeboid (1), larger shape amoeboid (2),
large lamellipodia (3), bipolar ramified (4), heterogeneous ramified (5) and multiple
extend process (6)[42-44]. Quantification of the microglia population revealed that the CM treatment altered
the proportions of the subtypes induced by 6-OHDA. The 6-OHDA treatment increased
population of activate microglias, subtype 4–6, and decreased the resting cells with
residual amoeboid morphology. This population shift was reversed by hpNPC-CM: the portion
of round shaped resting microglia increased in the expense of reduction in the activated
microglia population (Figure
6(e)). Next, we examined whether the effect of transplanted hpNPCs was associated
with inhibition of 6-OHDA-induced glial cells activation in PDrats. Parallel to
CM-mediated immune suppression, the hpNPC transplantation into the 6-OHDA-treated rats
mitigated activation of immune responses at 12 weeks after transplantation compared with
controls and even hpMSC-treated rats: enlarged cell soma and numerous process containing
ramified Iba1 positive microglias and GFAP-positive astrocytes were detected on striatum
and SN regions in the 6-OHDA-treated and 6-OHDA-plus-hpMSC-treated rats, and their
populations were substantially reduced by transplantation of hpNPCs (Figure 6(f)). Taken together, the hpNPCs have
potentials to modulate immune responses of damaged brains with secreted factors in a
paracrine manner.
Figure 6.
hpNPCs protected neural precursor cells via paracrine factor associated immune
modulation. (a) Apoptotic cells were estimated by cells with apoptotic nuclei at
differentiation day 14 for cell survival in mouse fetal cortical and midbrain neuronal
cells co-cultured with media only, hpMSCs or hpNPCs. (Scale bar: 100μm). (b)
Quantification of apoptotic nuclei/DAPI in co-culture of mouse fetal cortex- or
midbrain-derived neuronal cells with media only, hpMSCs or hpNPCs. ***, p<
0.0001and **, P<0.01. (c) Shown in upper panels were determined 14 days
after differentiation by immunocytochemical assay for dopaminergic neuron marker, TH
(white). The boxed area in the upper panel exhibiting mature TH+ DA neurons (green) is
enlarged in the lower panel (scale bar: 100 μm). (d) After treatment with 6-OHDA (0,
25, 50 μM), activated microglias and astrocytes were treated with CM from hpNPCs for 3
days in vitro and stained with Iba1 (green) or astrocytes with GFAP (red). The CM from
hpNPC-treated microglial cells were less activated. The boxed area in the left panel
showing diverse morphology of Iba+ microglial cells is a higher magnification in the
right panel (scale bar: 100μm). (e) In the presence of CM from hpNPCs, quantification
of activated microglial cells were counted by morphology of Iba+ cells (green) after
treatment of 6-OHDA for 3 days. (f) Photomicrographs of Iba-1 and GFAP in the ST and
SN after intracerebral injections of 6-OHDA with saline, hpMSCs or hpNPCs. The
hpNPC-injected rats displayed suppression of microglial or astrocytic activation
compared with saline and hpMSC-injected ones. 6-OHDA: 6-hydroxy dopamine; DAPI:
4’,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole; DA: dopamine; GFAP: glial fibrillary acidic protein;
hpMSC: human placenta mesenchymal stem cell; hpNPC: hpMSC-derived neural phenotype
cell; SN: substantia nigra; ST: striatum; TH: tyrosine hydroxylase.
hpNPCs protected neural precursor cells via paracrine factor associated immune
modulation. (a) Apoptotic cells were estimated by cells with apoptotic nuclei at
differentiation day 14 for cell survival in mouse fetal cortical and midbrain neuronal
cells co-cultured with media only, hpMSCs or hpNPCs. (Scale bar: 100μm). (b)
Quantification of apoptotic nuclei/DAPI in co-culture of mouse fetal cortex- or
midbrain-derived neuronal cells with media only, hpMSCs or hpNPCs. ***, p<
0.0001and **, P<0.01. (c) Shown in upper panels were determined 14 days
after differentiation by immunocytochemical assay for dopaminergic neuron marker, TH
(white). The boxed area in the upper panel exhibiting mature TH+ DA neurons (green) is
enlarged in the lower panel (scale bar: 100 μm). (d) After treatment with 6-OHDA (0,
25, 50 μM), activated microglias and astrocytes were treated with CM from hpNPCs for 3
days in vitro and stained with Iba1 (green) or astrocytes with GFAP (red). The CM from
hpNPC-treated microglial cells were less activated. The boxed area in the left panel
showing diverse morphology of Iba+ microglial cells is a higher magnification in the
right panel (scale bar: 100μm). (e) In the presence of CM from hpNPCs, quantification
of activated microglial cells were counted by morphology of Iba+ cells (green) after
treatment of 6-OHDA for 3 days. (f) Photomicrographs of Iba-1 and GFAP in the ST and
SN after intracerebral injections of 6-OHDA with saline, hpMSCs or hpNPCs. The
hpNPC-injected rats displayed suppression of microglial or astrocytic activation
compared with saline and hpMSC-injected ones. 6-OHDA: 6-hydroxy dopamine; DAPI:
4’,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole; DA: dopamine; GFAP: glial fibrillary acidic protein;
hpMSC: human placenta mesenchymal stem cell; hpNPC: hpMSC-derived neural phenotype
cell; SN: substantia nigra; ST: striatum; TH: tyrosine hydroxylase.
Discussion
Among the neurodegenerative diseases, PD is one with high frequency in the elderly over 60
years and devastates lives of both the affected individuals and their kin. Chronic oxidative
stresses and damages, mitochondrial dysfunction, and genetic mutations lead to loss of DA
neurons in midbrain, pathological features of PD, but growing results support aging as a
primary factor in PD pathogenesis[45-48]. Because loss of DA neurons causes decline of dopamine and uncontrolled movement of
the patients, the current therapeutic treatments are administration of L-DOPA and DA
agonists, and deep bran stimulation[49]. Although these approaches are able to mitigate PD symptoms, they are temporary in
relief and not able to control a complex pathogenesis of PD. To protect loss of DA in a
midbrain region in PD, the stem cell, especially MSC, based therapies have been shed light
as an alternative approach and have showed promising results. However, the therapeutic
mechanism of non-neural MSC-mediated functional recovery has not been clearly
demonstrated.Placenta becomes an attractive extra embryonic tissue as a fetal pluripotent stem cell
source upon several reasons. First, because human placentas are usually discarded after
birth, the acquisition of the stem cells from the placenta is free of ethical issues[50]. Secondly, placenta has two sides, a fetal consisting of amnion and chorion and a
maternal side consisting of deciduas, and the diverse stem cells from both sides exhibit not
only attributes of MSCs but also differentiation capacities into different lineages such as
ectodermal neuronal and retinal cells, endodermal pancreatic beta cells[51]. Thirdly, the placental MSCs secrete large amounts of proangiogenic and antiapoptotic
cytokines and have immunosuppressive properties such as suppressing T-cell proliferation[52,53]. In addition, compared with the MSCs from bone marrow, cord blood, and adipose
tissue, the placental MSCs were recently reported to grow faster and to undergo slower
senescence, implying that the placenta MSCs are available for long-term culture[54]. Nonetheless, characteristic analysis of placental stem cells, in particular hpMSCs,
was not fully conducted. Our studies first confirmed hpMSCs as stereotypical MSCs: along
with long lasting proliferation capacity, they were positive for MSC markers CD44, CD73, and
CD105, as well as ESC markers SSEA4, TRA-1-60, and TRA1- 81 but negative for a hematopoietic
marker CD34. The hpMSCs were able to induce appropriate genes for particular lineages in
differentiation conditions (Figure
1(e)). Among MSC markers, CD90(Thy-1), which is a marker for ESCs and neural cells
as well, was expressed in majority of the isolated hpMSCs. The CD90 positive population
among the MSCs isolated from term placenta displayed wide spectra: almost all umbilical cord
derived MSCs (UC-MSCs) (99%) are positive for CD90 but a small portion (about 26%) of
Wharton’s jelly-derived MSCs (WJ-MSCs) expresses it. A large population of CD90-positive
among the hpMSCs here may result from their origin, a maternal amniotic membrane, because
the MSCs from maternal side of placenta were CD90 positive[52-54]. The high level of the CD90 in the hpMSCs is intriguing in that the CD90 is expressed
in cells of the immune and nervous systems, and is engaged in modulating T-cell activation,
inflammation, modulating neuronal growth and signal transmission, and tumor suppression[55,56]. It is worthwhile to study the role of CD90 in hpMSC mediated immune modulation.
Among four stem cell factors, only Sox2 was clearly detected in the hpMSCs at protein and
cellular level (Figure 1(f)).
Considering that none of the MSCs, including bone marrow, adipose, cord blood, and placenta
MSCs, expressed all four factors, their particular patterns of expression in MSCs are likely
dependent of their origin and culture conditions[54]. In our study, only Sox2 was expressed at detectable levels in the all prepared
hpMSCs, indicating that subpopulations of stem cells from placenta have particular
regulatory signals for Sox2 expression and functions. At this moment, we do not know the
mechanism but Sox2 expression in the hpMSCs may endow hpMSCs with distinct potentials for
their cellular behaviors including differentiation potential. Because Sox2 is one of early
neuronal lineage markers and CD90 is of late neuronal ones, the relatively high level of
CD90 and SOX2 expression in hpMSCs suggests that the hpMSCs have strong capacities both for
immune modulation and for differentiation into neuronal cells. Upon these two properties,
hpMSCs are regarded as a good candidate of cell therapies for neurodegenerative diseases
including PD.
hpNPCs are able to Recover Physiological Deficits of a Rat Model of PD via Dual
Mechanisms, Neuroprotection and Immune Modulation
We recently reported that the transplantation of human fetal midbrain derived neural
progenitor cells was able to restore functional deficits of 6-OHDA-treated PDrats: the
damaged rat grafted with the fetal progenitor cells exhibited a significant recovery in
motor asymmetry 12 weeks post-graft along with elevated level of dopamine in the area of
the lesioned striatum[29]. Due to ethical concerns and limitations on supply in fetal stem cells or fetal NP
cells, we have looked for the alternatives and in this study, presented therapeutic
potentials of the hpNPCs. Compared with either the saline or hpMSC-treated rats, the
hpNPC-transplanted PDrats exhibited significant recovery in motor dysfunctions (Figure 2(b–e)). Along with
convalescing motor activities, the hpNPC-xenografted PDrats partially regained DA and
TH-positive population in both SN and striatum (Figure 3). The hpNPC-mediated restoration may provide
good opportunities to substitute the hpNPCs for fetal neural progenitor cells in many
therapies. Because both hpMSCs and hpNPCs are relatively easier to secure a large amount
of supply from placenta, this possibility may also help to develop novel stem cell-based
therapies in diverse diseases as well as to understand underlying mechanism of cell
therapies.Abnormal innate and adaptive immune responses including microglia activation are a
critical feature of PD: toxic molecules, such as α-synuclein, released from damaged
neurons activate microglia and the activated microglial cells, in turns, secret
proinflammatory factors and ROS, which further aggravate neuronal damages. Moreover,
modified α-synuclein is recognized as an antigen and recruit effector T-cells activating microglia[57]. Growing results suggest that regulation of immune responses in PD is considered as
a critical target in developing therapies and in animal model of PD, MSCs and NP cells
protected DA neurons and suppressed activation of astrocyte and microglia through
paracrine factors[39,40]. In this study, we showed that the hpNPC-mediated recovery in the 6-OHDA-treated
rats was associated with, at least, immunosuppression and neuroprotection, where both
paracrine factors and cell contact interactions at the grafted sites play key roles (Figures 5 and 6). Co-culture experiments of activated glial cells
with the hpNPCs reveal that the hpNPCs produce diffusible factors enhancing survivability
and neuronal differentiation, including into TH-positive neurons, of the primary NP cells
from fetal cortex and midbrain (Figure
6(a–c)). Less Activated microglia cells and astrocytes treated with the CM from
the hpNPCs indicate that hpNPCs are able to suppress immune responses with diffusible
factors (Figure 6(d)).
Interestingly, while co-cultured NP cells from cortex were protected at comparable levels
by both hpMSCs and hpNPCs, the hpNPCs are more efficient in protection of NP cells from
midbrain than hpMSCs. A bank of secreted factors promoting DA neuron protection and
differentiation have been identified including Wnt1, Wnt5a, and sonic hedgehog (SHH), some
of which were expressed in hpMSCs[41,58,59]. Furthermore, the hpMSCs secrete immunosuppressive TGFβ, interleukin (IL)-10, and
Insulin degrading enzyme (IDE), and mitigated astrocyte/microglia activation[30,31]. Because hpNPCs are derived from hpMSCs, it is a reasonable expectation that hpNPCs
are able to produce diffusible factors with similar functions. However, two cells display
differential restoration capacities of motor defects, DAneuron loss, and long-term immune
modulation, suggesting that hpMSCs and hpNPCs secrete differential as well as common
diffusible molecules regulating immune responses and survival signals. Now the secreted
molecules and metabolites in the CMs from both conditions are under investigation to
search relevant new factors and novel mechanisms.Along with soluble factors, a DLL1-Notch signal is able to contribute the hpMSC/hpNPC
associated suppression of astrocyte/microglia activation as well as neuroprotection (Figure 5(c)): the high levels of DLL1
expressed in hpNPCs was paralleled with the increased survival of DA neurons in the SN of
the PDrat model in our study. Notch was reported to repress microglia activation through
Notch mediated suppression of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) release as well as the
expression of MHC-II and OX40 L on mast cells, which induce the differentiation of Th2[60,61]. In addition, the silencing of DLL1 caused a decrease in TH expression, showing
that DLL-Notch signals enhance viability and differentiation of DA neurons[62,63]. In a rat model of PD, α-synuclein was reported to bind a Notch 1 promoter with p53
protein and repressed its expression as well as Notch mediated neurogenesis in PD[35,64]. Mildronate, a small molecule with charged nitrogen and oxygen atoms, protected DA
neurons in 6-OHDA-treated rats via stimulation of Notch 3 signaling and suppression of
GFAP and inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS; an inflammation marker)[36]. These reports indicate that Notch signals not only modulate transport of external
signals but can also affect neighbors via cell contacts and secretion factors. In this
study, the GFP-tagged hpNPCs in the grafted site here expressed both DLL1 and NRTN and
induced DLL1 expression around the injection site for a long period (Figures 4 and 6). In particular, when AAV- NRTN (CERE-120) was
injected into the striatum and SN, it prevented the emergence of motor symptoms shown in
1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP)-treated young adult monkeys for up to
10 months[65]. Induction of DLL1 and NRTN supports the idea that the hpNPCs are able to change
the environment to the favorable condition for survival and neuronal differentiation via
both cell contact and paracrine manners. Interestingly, CM injected into the SN and
striatum (STR) into a rat model of PD relieved PD-associated functional and physiological deficits[41]. Protective capacity of CM was comparable with that of the transplanted NPCs,
indicating the secreted molecules are critical therapeutic factors. Co-culture experiments
of NP cells either with hpNPCs or hpMSCs fit into their conclusions even though the better
protection and DA differentiation were observed from hpNPC co-cultured midbrain cells. In
this study, the transplanted hpNPCs induced not only neurotrophic factors including NRTN
but also DLL-Notch-mediated cell contact signals. These two distinct signals are
beneficial in treatment: the secreted factors are able to influence larger areas and the
cell contact signals improve neuroprotection and immunosuppression at graft and adjacent
areas. It will be interesting to see whether cell transplantation and CM have differential
therapeutic effects on PD treatment and which mechanisms/pathways redeem each other if
each of them has their own drawbacks.Hereto we characterized the human placenta MSCs, hpMSCs, and investigated the therapeutic
potentials of hpMSCs and their neural phenotype cells, hpNPCs, with a PDrat model. The
present study is the first report to compare efficiencies of functional recovery of
PD-associated deficits between placenta MSCs and their neural derivatives and to delineate
the non-neural MSC-mediated therapeutic mechanisms: immunosuppression and neuroprotection
via diverse diffusible factors and cell contact signals. Here we suggest that the hpMSCs
and hpNPCs are good cellular sources for cell therapies and their medical applications are
plausible in wide ranging of neural diseases including PD and aging.
Authors: Raymond T Bartus; Christopher D Herzog; Yaping Chu; Alistair Wilson; Lamar Brown; Joao Siffert; Eugene M Johnson; C Warren Olanow; Elliott J Mufson; Jeffrey H Kordower Journal: Mov Disord Date: 2010-11-18 Impact factor: 10.338
Authors: Jea-Young Lee; Julian P Tuazon; Sydney Corey; Brooke Bonsack; Sandra Acosta; Jared Ehrhart; Paul R Sanberg; Cesario V Borlongan Journal: Stem Cell Rev Rep Date: 2019-10 Impact factor: 6.692
Authors: Jea-Young Lee; Julian P Tuazon; Jared Ehrhart; Paul R Sanberg; Cesario V Borlongan Journal: J Cell Mol Med Date: 2019-05-31 Impact factor: 5.310