| Literature DB >> 32612523 |
Ken Kuwahara1, Tatsuya Sasaki1, Takao Yasuhara1, Masahiro Kameda1, Yosuke Okazaki1, Kakeru Hosomoto1, Ittetsu Kin1, Mihoko Okazaki1, Satoru Yabuno1, Satoshi Kawauchi1, Yousuke Tomita1, Michiari Umakoshi1, Kyohei Kin1, Jun Morimoto1, Jea-Young Lee2, Naoki Tajiri3, Cesar V Borlongan2, Isao Date1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) exerts neuroprotective effects in animal models of Parkinson's disease (PD). Conventional stimulation techniques entail limited stimulation time and restricted movement of animals, warranting the need for optimizing the SCS regimen to address the progressive nature of the disease and to improve its clinical translation to PD patients.Entities:
Keywords: 6-hydroxydopamine; electrical stimulation; neuroinflammation; neuromodulation; neuroprotection
Year: 2020 PMID: 32612523 PMCID: PMC7309445 DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2020.00164
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Aging Neurosci ISSN: 1663-4365 Impact factor: 5.750
FIGURE 1Wireless controllable electrical stimulation system (SAS-200). (A) The stimulation device measures 20 mm × 40 mm × 20 mm, with a net weight of 26 g (including the battery). The control panel is covered by an aluminum case and fixed by screws on two sides. (B) Stimulation conditions can be changed using a Windows PC and transmitted through Bluetooth.
FIGURE 2Time course of this study.
FIGURE 3An electrode and images of surgery. (A) A silver ball SCS electrode used in this study (diameter: 2 mm). (B) An image showing electrode implantation. A silver ball electrode was placed on the dorsal surface of the spinal cord and fixed by a silk thread. (C) An image showing a rat with a stimulation device. After fixation of the stimulation device on the back, a handmade jacket was put on the rat.
FIGURE 4Changes in body weight.
FIGURE 5Spinal cord stimulation and behavioral outcomes. (A) Contralateral bias in the cylinder test. In the 24-h stimulation group, improvement of contralateral bias was observed from days 7 to 14. In the 8-h stimulation group, improvement was observed on day 14 (#p < 0.01, ∗p < 0.05). (B) Methamphetamine-induced rotations per 90 min. The number of methamphetamine-induced rotations significantly decreased in the 8- and 24-h stimulation groups compared to the control group (#p < 0.01).
FIGURE 6Spinal cord stimulation and TH staining in the striatum. (A) TH-positive fibers were preserved in the striatum of the 8- and 24-h stimulation groups (10×). In the right column, the low magnified images are shown (2×). (B) The ratio of TH-positive fibers in the lesioned striatum to the intact side was significantly preserved in the stimulation groups compared to that in the control group (#p < 0.01). TH-positive fibers in the striatum of rats in the 24-h stimulation group were significantly preserved compared to those in the 8-h stimulation group (∗p < 0.05).
FIGURE 7Spinal cord stimulation and TH staining in the SNc. (A) TH-positive neurons in the SNc were preserved in the stimulation groups (10×). (B) TH-positive neurons in the SNc in the 8- and 24-h stimulation groups were significantly preserved compared to those in the control group (#p < 0.01).
FIGURE 8Spinal cord stimulation and Iba1 staining in the striatum and SNc. (A,B) Iba1 staining in the striatum (A) and the SNc (B) of the lesion side (40×). (C,D) The number of Iba1-positive cells in the lesioned striatum (C) significantly decreased in the 24-h stimulation group compared to the control group (∗p < 0.05). Similarly, the number of Iba1-positive cells in the lesioned SNc (D) significantly decreased in the 24-h stimulation group compared to the control group (#p < 0.01, ∗p < 0.05).
FIGURE 9Spinal cord stimulation and laminin staining in the cerebral cortex. (A) Laminin-positive areas in the cerebral cortex of rats in the stimulation groups were augmented compared to those in the control group (40×). (B) Laminin-positive cells in the cerebral cortex in the 24-h stimulation group were augmented compared to those in the control group (#p < 0.01, ∗p < 0.05).