| Literature DB >> 29870994 |
Suping Zhang1, Qian Huang1,2, Qiaoling Wang1, Qin Wang1, Xiaoyun Cao1, Liang Zhao1,3, Nan Xu1, Zhengbing Zhuge1, Jianhua Mao1, Xiaodong Fu3, Ruisheng Liu4, Christopher S Wilcox5, Andreas Patzak6, Lingli Li5, En Yin Lai1,5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Canonical Wnt signaling is involved in oxidative stress, vasculopathy and diabetes mellitus but its role in diabetic renal microvascular dysfunction is unclear. We tested the hypothesis that enhanced canonical Wnt signaling in renal afferent arterioles from diabetic mice increases reactive oxygen species (ROS) and contractions to endothelin-1 (ET-1).Entities:
Keywords: Afferent arteriole; Canonical Wnt signaling; Diabetes mellitus; Endothelin-1; Reactive oxygen species
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29870994 PMCID: PMC6050514 DOI: 10.1159/000490334
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Kidney Blood Press Res ISSN: 1420-4096 Impact factor: 2.687
Blood glucose levels (mmol.l−1) in non-diabetic and diabetic mice. Diabetic vs Non-diabetic: P < 0.001; Non-diabetic + Sulindac vs Non-diabetic: NS; Diabetic + Sulindac vs Diabetic: NS
| Mice | Mean ± SEM | N | T-test |
|---|---|---|---|
| Non-diabetic | 6.7 ± 0.3 | 8 | |
| Diabetic | 20.7 ± 1.0 | 17 | P < 0.001 |
| Non-diabetic + Sulindac | 6.9 ± 0.3 | 8 | NS |
| Diabetic + Sulindac | 21.4 ± 0.9 | 16 | NS |
Fig. 1.Meant ± SEM values (n =5–6) for ET-1 responses of afferent arterioles from control mice in the absence (black diamonds with black line) or presence of PEG-SOD (200 units mL−1) (A) or PEG-catalase (1000 units mL−1) (B) or Sulindac (40 mg·kg−1 day−1 for 4 weeks) (C) (blue triangles with blue line), diabetic mice in the absence (grey squares with grey line) or presence of PEG-SOD (A) or PEG catalase (B) or Sulindac) (C) (red crosses with red line). Data are shown for changes in luminal dimeters of afferent arterioles in response to ET-1 (10−12 - 10−8 mol·l−1). ANOVA, analysis of variance; ET-1, endotheline-1; PEG, polyethylene glycol; SOD, superoxide dismutase; DM, diabetes mellitus.
Fig. 2.Mean ± SEM values (n=5) for O2.− and H2O2 in the perfused individual afferent arteriole (A and B) or in the isolated preglomerular arterioles (C and D) from control mice (open boxes), diabetic mice (blue filled boxes) and sulindac treated diabetic mice (grey filled boxes). Data are shown as the basal levels of ethidium:dihydroethidium (E:DHE) fluorescence ratio for O2.−, H2DCFDA fluorescence for H2O2, their changes in response to ET-1 (10−8 mol·l−1) in the perfused individual arteriole and units (or μmol)·mg-l protein for their concentrations in the isolated preglomerular arterioles. Comparing groups: * P<0.05; ‡ P< 0.001.
Fig. 3.Time course of changes in luminal diameter of perfused afferent arterioles (n=5) from normal control (without injection, black diamonds with solid line), vehicle control (7 days after injection of citrate buffer, grey diamonds with grey line) and diabetic mice (7 days after injection of STZ, blue triangles with blue line) by bath addition of H2O2 (10 μmol·l−1). ANOVA, analysis of variance.
Fig. 4.Mean ± SEM values (n=5) for the ratio of phosphorylated protein p-GSk-3β/GSk-3β (A) and p-β-catenin/β-catenin (B) in preglomerular arterioles from control mice (open boxes), diabetic mice (blue filled boxes) and Sulindac treated diabetic mice (grey filled boxes). Comparing groups: * P< 0.05; ‡ P< 0.001.
Fig. 5.Mean ± SEM values (n=5) for protein expression of catalase, SOD1 and SOD2 in preglomerular arterioles from control mice (open boxes), diabetic mice (blue filled boxes) and Sulindac treated diabetic mice (grey filled boxes). Comparing groups: ‡ P< 0.001.
Fig. 6.Mean ± SEM values (n=5) for enzymatic activity of total SOD (A) and catalase (B) in preglomerular arterioles from control mice (open boxes), diabetic mice (blue filled boxes) and Sulindac treated diabetic mice (grey filled boxes). Comparing groups: * P< 0.05; ‡ P< 0.001.