Literature DB >> 19951579

Combined use of extensively porous coated femoral components with onlay cortical strut allografts in revision of Vancouver B2 and B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures.

Hao-bo Wu1, Shi-gui Yan, Li-dong Wu, Rong-xin He, Xiang-hua Wang, Xue-song Dai.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Periprosthetic femoral fractures following total hip arthroplasty are getting more prevalent. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical results of combined use of uncemented extensively porous coated femoral components with onlay cortical strut allografts in revision of Vancouver type B2 and B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures.
METHODS: Thirteen hips after total hip arthroplasty in 13 patients who suffered a Vancouver B2 or B3 periprosthetic fracture were treated with an uncemented extensively porous coated femoral component combined with onlay cortical strut allografts. Each patient was assigned a Harris hip score, and a visual analog scale (VAS) score for pain and satisfaction. Radiographs were examined for component stability, fracture site and allograft-host union and allograft reconstruction.
RESULTS: At an average of 5.3-year follow-up, no patient required repeat revision. The average Harris hip score was (71.8 +/- 6.3) points, the pain VAS score was (16.6 +/- 4.3) points, and the patient satisfaction VAS score was (81.5 +/- 5.7) points. Radiographic examination showed no detectable loosening of the prostheses, and 12 cases were presented fixation by osseointegration and the other one was stable fibrous ingrown fixation. All fractures united for (5.2 +/- 1.4) months in average. And all onlay strut allografts united to host bone for about (11.5 +/- 2.6) months.
CONCLUSIONS: Combined use of uncemented, long stemmed, extensively porous coated implant with cortical onlay strut allografts can achieve good clinic results and high rate of union for both fracture site and allograft-host bone junction. This technique could be used routinely to augment fixation and healing of Vancouver B2 and B3 periprosthetic fractures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19951579

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)        ISSN: 0366-6999            Impact factor:   2.628


  4 in total

Review 1.  The management of type B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures: when to fix and when to revise.

Authors:  Adam T Yasen; Fares S Haddad
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Reconstructed the bone stock after femoral bone loss in Vancouver B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures using cortical strut allograft and impacted cancellous allograft.

Authors:  Donghai Li; Qinsheng Hu; Pengde Kang; Jing Yang; Zongke Zhou; Bin Shen; Fuxing Pei
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Is cemented revision total hip arthroplasty a reasonable treatment option in an elderly population?

Authors:  Philipp Born; Isabella Manzoni; Thomas Ilchmann; Martin Clauss
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2019-10-02

4.  Treatment of Vancouver Type B Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures Using Cortical Strut Allografts.

Authors:  Dae Gyu Kwon; Jin Seong Park; Kyoung Ho Moon
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2022-09-06
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.