| Literature DB >> 29868047 |
Mengxiao Yan1, Yanshi Xiong1, Ruibin Liu1,2, Min Deng1, Jiaojiao Song1,3.
Abstract
The East Asian subtropics mostly occupied by evergreen broad-leaved forests (EBLFs), is one of the global diversity centers for evergreen oaks. Evergreen oaks are keystone canopy trees in EBLFs with important ecosystem function and crucial significance for regional biodiversity conservation. However, the species composition and diversity of Asian evergreen oaks are poorly understood. Here, we test whether the four chloroplast markers atpI-atpH, matK, psbA-trnH, and ycf1, can discriminate the two evergreen oak sections in Asia - Cyclobalanopsis and Ilex. Two hundred and seventy-two individuals representing 57 species were scanned and 17 species from other oaks sections were included for phylogenetic reconstruction. The genetic diversity of the Quercus sections was also compared. Overall, we found that universal chloroplast DNA (cpDNA) barcoding markers could resolve two clades in Quercus, i.e., subgenus Cerris (Old World Clade) and subgenus Quercus (New World Clade). The chloroplast markers distinguished the main sections, with few exceptions. Each cpDNA region showed no barcoding gap and none of them provided good resolution at the species level. The best species resolution (27.78%) was obtained when three or four markers were combined and analyzed using BLAST. The high conservation of the cpDNA and complicated evolutionary patterns, due to incomplete lineage sorting, interspecific hybridization and introgressions may hinder the ability of cpDNA markers to discriminate different species. When comparing diversification pattern across Quercus sections (Cyclobalanopsis, Ilex, Cerris, Quercus, and Protobalanus), we found that section Ilex was the most genetically diverse, and section Cyclobalanopsis was lower genetically diverse. This diversification pattern may have resulted from the interplay of the Eurasia Cenozoic tectonic movements, climate changes and different niches of their ancestral lineages.Entities:
Keywords: DNA barcoding; Quercus; cpDNA; genetic diversity; section Cyclobalanopsis; section Ilex
Year: 2018 PMID: 29868047 PMCID: PMC5952231 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00569
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 5.753
Characteristics of the four cpDNA markers used in this study.
| Vs | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barcode | Ns | PCR | L | Number | % | Indel | Pi | Hn | Hd | |
| 345 | 72 | 92.2 | 1,187 | 128 | 10.78 | 99 | 0.00448 | 77 | 0.851 | |
| 374 | 74 | 100 | 691 | 64 | 9.26 | 3 | 0.00467 | 64 | 0.819 | |
| 357 | 74 | 95.5 | 554 | 64 | 11.55 | 26 | 0.02012 | 68 | 0.905 | |
| 363 | 74 | 97.1 | 796 | 90 | 11.31 | 43 | 0.00954 | 66 | 0.827 | |
Comparison of inter- and intraspecific p-distance of the four chloroplast markers and Wilcoxon rank sum test between inter- and intraspecific p-distance.
| Barcode | Intraspecific distance (mean) | Theta (mean) | Coalescent depth (mean) | Interspecific distance (mean) | Wilcoxon rank sum test | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| W statistic | ||||||
| 0–0.0180 (0.0020) | 0–0.0097 (0.0023) | 0–0.0180 (0.0046) | 0–0.0260 (0.0048) | 15488000 | <0.001 | |
| 0–0.0130 (0.0017) | 0–0.0100 (0.0022) | 0–0.0130 (0.0039) | 0–0.0140 (0.0052) | 20437000 | <0.001 | |
| 0–0.0430 (0.0069) | 0–0.0380 (0.0082) | 0–0.0430 (0.0145) | 0–0.0530 (0.0201) | 14029000 | <0.001 | |
| 0–0.0240 (0.0030) | 0–0.0153 (0.0036) | 0–0.0240 (0.0072) | 0–0.0300 (0.0095) | 18544000 | <0.001 | |
Genetic diversity obtained from the combined cpDNA sequences.
| Dataset (section) | Ns | Vs | Pi | Hn | Hd | Indel | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number | % | ||||||||
| 147 | 29 | 0–0.019 (0.0020 ± 0.0031) | 134 | 4.19 | 0.00205 | 54 | 0.837 | 55 | |
| 125 | 28 | 0–0.018 (0.0090 ± 0.0041) | 220 | 6.88 | 0.00867 | 77 | 0.989 | 70 | |
| 18 | 4 | 0–0.011 (0.0025 ± 0.0026) | 51 | 1.59 | 0.00257 | 9 | 0.895 | 32 | |
| 11 | 7 | 0–0.013 (0.0059 ± 0.0045) | 67 | 2.10 | 0.00588 | 9 | 0.964 | 25 | |
| 7 | 5 | 0–0.006 (0.0017 ± 0.0015) | 17 | 0.53 | 0.00867 | 4 | 0.714 | 4 | |
| 1 | 1 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | |