| Literature DB >> 29867521 |
Jesper Bencke1, Per Aagaard2, Mette K Zebis3.
Abstract
Young, adolescent female athletes are at particular high risk of sustaining a non-contact anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury during sport. Through the last decades much attention has been directed toward various anatomical and biomechanical risk factors for non-contact ACL injury, and important information have been retrieved about the influence of external loading factors on ACL injury risk during given sports-specific movements. However, much less attention has been given to the aspect of neuromuscular control during such movements and only sparse knowledge exists on the specific muscle activation patterns involved during specific risk conditions. Therefore, the aim of this narrative review was (1) to describe anatomical aspects, strength aspects and biomechanical aspects relevant for the understanding of ACL non-contact injury mechanisms in young female athletes, and (2) to review the existing literature on lower limb muscle activation in relation to risk of non-contact ACL-injury and prevention of ACL injury in young female athletes. Studies investigating muscle activity patterns associated with sports-specific risk situations were identified, comprising cohort studies, intervention studies and prospective studies. Based on the retrieved studies, clear gender-specific differences in muscle activation and coordination were identified demonstrating elevated quadriceps activity and reduced hamstring activity in young female athletes compared to their male counterparts, and suggesting young female athletes to be at elevated risk of non-contact ACL injury. Only few studies (n = 6) examined the effect of preventive exercise-based intervention protocols on lower limb muscle activation during sports-specific movements. A general trend toward enhanced hamstring activation was observed during selected injury risk situations (e.g., sidecutting and drop landings). Only a single study examined the association between muscle activation deficits and ACL injury risk, reporting that low medial hamstring activation and high vastus lateralis activation prior to landing was associated with an elevated incidence of ACL-injury. A majority of studies were performed in adult female athletes. The striking paucity of studies in adolescent female athletes emphasizes the need for increased research activities to examine of lower limb muscle activity in relation to non-contact ACL injury in this high-risk athlete population.Entities:
Keywords: ACL; adolescent; athlete; female; hamstrings; injury prevention; injury risk; muscle activation
Year: 2018 PMID: 29867521 PMCID: PMC5962681 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2018.00445
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Physiol ISSN: 1664-042X Impact factor: 4.566
Studies relating neuromuscular activation to biomechanical risk factors or gender comparisons.
| Study | Female/male | Age [years (SD)] | Outcome parameters | Results |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| F: 21.1 (3.6) M: 22.9 (3.7) | Sidecut 3D kinematics and quadriceps, hamstring and gastrocnemius EMG. Gender differences | Females more gastrocnemius activity than males, and a more VL-to-VM dominated activity than males | ||
| F: 22.7 (3.1) M: 23.1 (3.4) | Sidecut preactivity EMG of quadriceps and hamstring, and pre-activity H/Q-ratio | Females showing less hamstring preactivity and smaller H/Q-ratio | ||
| F: 22.3 (2.2) M: 22.6 (2.2) | Stop jump 3D biomechanics and averaged and normalized quadriceps and hamstring EMG | Females more quadriceps activation than males, and more hamstring activation before landing | ||
| F+M: 22.2 (1.7) | Sidecut and landing kinematics and quadriceps and hamstring EMG | High quadriceps activity and low hamstring activity before ground contact | ||
| F: 19.9 (0.9) M: 21.0 (1.2) | Sidecut and drop landing quadriceps and hamstring EMG | Females showing less hamstring activity than males after contact, and lower EMG H/Q-ratio | ||
| University athletes | Jump landing knee kinematics and quadriceps and hamstring EMG | No gender differences in EMG activity | ||
| F: 19.8 (1.1) M: 19.4 (1.4) | Sidecut quadriceps and hamstring and hip EMG | Females showing greater pre-activity VL and gluteus medialis activation and lower H/Q-ratio than males | ||
| F: 16.7 (1.0) M: 17.0 (0.6) | Sidecut 3D biomechanics and EMG of quadriceps, hamstring and gastrocnemius | Females demonstrating higher quadriceps and gastrocnemius activity in stance | ||
| F: 24.6 (1.0) M: 24.5 (2.5) | Running, cross-cutting, and sidecutting 3D biomechanics and quadriceps and hamstring EMG | Females tending to have elevated quadriceps and reduced hamstring activity during stance phase in all movement task examined | ||
| F: 22.3 (3.7) M: 25.5 (2.7) | Slow lateral knee flexion and extension measuring VL and VM activity | Females having lower VM/VL ratio | ||
| F: 19.4 (0.9) M: 19.8 (4.6) | Single leg drop landing 3D biomechanics and quad-riceps and hamstring EMG | Pre activity EMG H/Q-ratio was lower in females compared to males | ||
| 13.5 (range: 11–20) | Drop landing 3D biomechanics. Quadriceps and hamstring EMG | Female subjects with more extended knee joint angle at landing impact showing increased quadriceps EMG | ||
| Children: 9.5 (0.9) Adults: 23.9 (2.8) | Drop landing 3D biomechanics and H/Q-activation ratio between children and adults | Children showing smaller EMG H/Q-ratios compared to adults | ||
| F: 16.1 (1.3) M: 16.3 (1.5) | Stop jump 3D biomechanics and VL and ST EMG | VL activity related to anterior shear force | ||
| F: 22.2 (2.9) M: 22.6 (2.6) | Drop Jump 3D biomechanics and quadriceps and hamstring EMG | Females having more quadriceps and hamstring activity than males. Greater peak quadriceps activity in subjects with high anterior shear forces, regardless of sex. Low strength was moderately related to high quadriceps activity in females. | ||
| F: 15.4 (1.0) | Sidecutting 3D biomechanics and quadriceps and Hamstring EMG differences between experienced and novice athletes | Novice athletes showed greater antagonist-agonist muscle co-activation at the knee | ||
| F: 19.4 (1.5) M: 19.6 (1.9) | Sidecutting 3D biomechanics and quadriceps and hamstring EMG | Females displayed greater average quadriceps EMG | ||
| Division I athletes (United States) | Drop landing hip and thigh EMG | Females showed less gluteus max activity after landing and more quadriceps pre activity |
Studies directly associating muscle activation patterns to risk of ACL injury using prospective study designs.
| Study | Cohort/follow-up | Age (SD) | Outcome parameters | Results |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fifty five female non-injured athletes were followed for two seasons | 24 (5) years | Sidecutting EMG of quadriceps and hamstrings | Five ACL injuries registered at follow-up. At baseline, the injured group showed less medial hamstring activity and greater VL activity, along with an elevated VL-ST EMG difference |
Studies examining effect of training on muscle activation in female athletes.
| Study | Intervention/control | Age [years (SD)] | Outcome parameters | Results |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plyometric ( | I: 14.5 (1.3) C: 14.2 (1.3) | Jump-landing 3D biomechanics and hip and thigh EMG | Both training groups increased gluteus medius activity before and during landing | |
| Pertubation training ( | I and C: 24.3 (3.5) | Single leg drop landing EMG of quadriceps and hamstrings | Increased level of co-contraction between quadriceps and hamstrings in the intervention group after intervention | |
| Jump and balance training ( | I: 19.4 (0.7) | Single leg drop landing 3D biomechanics and quadriceps and hamstrings EMG | Intervention increased pre activity hamstring activation, but not H/Q-ratio | |
| Agility training ( | I: 21.1 (3.6) C: 21.1 (1.8) | Sidecutting 3D kinematics and quadriceps and hamstrings EMG | Intervention group increased medial hamstring activation during ground contact | |
| Balance+jump+landing ( | I: 26 (3) | Sidecutting EMG of hip thigh and shank muscles | No change during control season but reduction in gluteus medialis pre activity and increase in medial hamstring activity following the intervention protocol | |
| Balance+jump+landing ( | I: 15.9 (0.4) C: 15.6 (0.5) | Sidecutting 3D biomechanics and EMG of quadriceps and hamstring | After intervention reduced VL-ST EMG difference was showed during the pre-landing phase for the intervention group |