David A Sherman1, Neal R Glaviano2, Grant E Norte3. 1. School of Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Health and Human Services, The University of Toledo, 2801 W. Bancroft St., HH 2505E, Mail Stop 119, Toledo, OH, 43606, USA. david.sherman2@rockets.utoledo.edu. 2. Department of Kinesiology, College of Agriculture, Health and Natural Resources, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA. 3. School of Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Health and Human Services, The University of Toledo, 2801 W. Bancroft St., HH 2505E, Mail Stop 119, Toledo, OH, 43606, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Hamstrings neuromuscular function is a crucial component of functional movement, and changes after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury contribute to risk factors for secondary injury and long-term sequelae. To effectively treat muscular impairments, an accurate understanding of hamstrings neuromuscular function in patients with ACL reconstruction (ACLR) is needed. OBJECTIVE: A systematic review and meta-analysis were undertaken to describe and quantify hamstrings neuromuscular function in individuals with ACLR compared to controls. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Web of Science, SPORTDiscus, CINAHL, and EBSCOhost databases in October of 2020 for studies evaluating the difference between hamstrings electromyography (EMG) between individuals with ACLR and controls. Two independent reviewers assessed each paper for inclusion and quality. Means and standard deviations were extracted from each included study to allow random-effect size (ES) meta-analysis calculations for comparison of results. RESULTS: Thirty-four studies were included for final review. From these, 5 categories of neuromuscular outcomes were identified, and studies were grouped accordingly: (1) muscle activation levels (EMG amplitude), (2) co-activation, (3) onset timing, (4) electromechanical delay, and (5) time-to-peak activity. Moderate to strong evidence indicates that individuals with ACLR demonstrate higher hamstrings EMG amplitude (normalized to % maximum voluntary isometric contraction) and hamstrings-to-quadriceps co-activation during gait and stair ambulation compared to controls. In addition, there was moderate evidence of longer electromechanical delay during knee flexion and greater hamstrings-to-quadriceps co-activation during knee extension compared to controls. CONCLUSIONS: Greater hamstrings EMG amplitude and co-activation during gait and ambulation tasks and longer electromechanical delay of the hamstrings in individuals with ACLR align with clinical impairments following ACLR and have implications for re-injury risk and long-term joint health, thus warranting attention in rehabilitation.
BACKGROUND: Hamstrings neuromuscular function is a crucial component of functional movement, and changes after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury contribute to risk factors for secondary injury and long-term sequelae. To effectively treat muscular impairments, an accurate understanding of hamstrings neuromuscular function in patients with ACL reconstruction (ACLR) is needed. OBJECTIVE: A systematic review and meta-analysis were undertaken to describe and quantify hamstrings neuromuscular function in individuals with ACLR compared to controls. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Web of Science, SPORTDiscus, CINAHL, and EBSCOhost databases in October of 2020 for studies evaluating the difference between hamstrings electromyography (EMG) between individuals with ACLR and controls. Two independent reviewers assessed each paper for inclusion and quality. Means and standard deviations were extracted from each included study to allow random-effect size (ES) meta-analysis calculations for comparison of results. RESULTS: Thirty-four studies were included for final review. From these, 5 categories of neuromuscular outcomes were identified, and studies were grouped accordingly: (1) muscle activation levels (EMG amplitude), (2) co-activation, (3) onset timing, (4) electromechanical delay, and (5) time-to-peak activity. Moderate to strong evidence indicates that individuals with ACLR demonstrate higher hamstrings EMG amplitude (normalized to % maximum voluntary isometric contraction) and hamstrings-to-quadriceps co-activation during gait and stair ambulation compared to controls. In addition, there was moderate evidence of longer electromechanical delay during knee flexion and greater hamstrings-to-quadriceps co-activation during knee extension compared to controls. CONCLUSIONS: Greater hamstrings EMG amplitude and co-activation during gait and ambulation tasks and longer electromechanical delay of the hamstrings in individuals with ACLR align with clinical impairments following ACLR and have implications for re-injury risk and long-term joint health, thus warranting attention in rehabilitation.
Authors: Brian Pietrosimone; Steven J Pfeiffer; Matthew S Harkey; Kyle Wallace; Christian Hunt; J Troy Blackburn; Randy Schmitz; David Lalush; Daniel Nissman; Jeffrey T Spang Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2018-12-17 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Kyle P Harris; Jeffrey B Driban; Michael R Sitler; Nicole M Cattano; Easwaran Balasubramanian; Jennifer M Hootman Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2015-06-26 Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: Nathan A Mall; Peter N Chalmers; Mario Moric; Miho J Tanaka; Brian J Cole; Bernard R Bach; George A Paletta Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2014-08-01 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Amelia J Wiggins; Ravi K Grandhi; Daniel K Schneider; Denver Stanfield; Kate E Webster; Gregory D Myer Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2016-01-15 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Brian Pietrosimone; Matthew K Seeley; Christopher Johnston; Steven J Pfeiffer; Jeffery T Spang; J Troy Blackburn Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2019-02