Literature DB >> 29866518

Acute changes in foot strike pattern and cadence affect running parameters associated with tibial stress fractures.

Jennifer R Yong1, Amy Silder2, Kate L Montgomery2, Michael Fredericson3, Scott L Delp4.   

Abstract

Tibial stress fractures are a common and debilitating injury that occur in distance runners. Runners may be able to decrease tibial stress fracture risk by adopting a running pattern that reduces biomechanical parameters associated with a history of tibial stress fracture. The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that converting to a forefoot striking pattern or increasing cadence without focusing on changing foot strike type would reduce injury risk parameters in recreational runners. Running kinematics, ground reaction forces and tibial accelerations were recorded from seventeen healthy, habitual rearfoot striking runners while running in their natural running pattern and after two acute retraining conditions: (1) converting to forefoot striking without focusing on cadence and (2) increasing cadence without focusing on foot strike. We found that converting to forefoot striking decreased two risk factors for tibial stress fracture: average and peak loading rates. Increasing cadence decreased one risk factor: peak hip adduction angle. Our results demonstrate that acute adaptation to forefoot striking reduces different injury risk parameters than acute adaptation to increased cadence and suggest that both modifications may reduce the risk of tibial stress fractures.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Forefoot strike; Rearfoot strike; Step frequency

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29866518      PMCID: PMC6203338          DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2018.05.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  41 in total

1.  Running perturbations reveal general strategies for step frequency selection.

Authors:  Kristine L Snyder; Mark Snaterse; J Maxwell Donelan
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2012-01-12

2.  Select injury-related variables are affected by stride length and foot strike style during running.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Boyer; Timothy R Derrick
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 6.202

3.  Energy absorption of impacts during running at various stride lengths.

Authors:  T R Derrick; J Hamill; G E Caldwell
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 5.411

4.  Impact reduction during running: efficiency of simple acute interventions in recreational runners.

Authors:  Marlène Giandolini; Pierrick J Arnal; Guillaume Y Millet; Nicolas Peyrot; Pierre Samozino; Blaise Dubois; Jean-Benoît Morin
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2012-08-09       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Step frequency and lower extremity loading during running.

Authors:  H Hobara; T Sato; M Sakaguchi; T Sato; K Nakazawa
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 3.118

6.  A retrospective case-control analysis of 2002 running injuries.

Authors:  J E Taunton; M B Ryan; D B Clement; D C McKenzie; D R Lloyd-Smith; B D Zumbo
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 13.800

7.  Competitive female runners with a history of iliotibial band syndrome demonstrate atypical hip and knee kinematics.

Authors:  Reed Ferber; Brian Noehren; Joseph Hamill; Irene S Davis
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.751

8.  Effects of step rate manipulation on joint mechanics during running.

Authors:  Bryan C Heiderscheit; Elizabeth S Chumanov; Max P Michalski; Christa M Wille; Michael B Ryan
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 5.411

9.  Stress fractures in athletes. A study of 320 cases.

Authors:  G O Matheson; D B Clement; D C McKenzie; J E Taunton; D R Lloyd-Smith; J G MacIntyre
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1987 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.202

10.  Is the foot striking pattern more important than barefoot or shod conditions in running?

Authors:  Yo Shih; Kuan-Lun Lin; Tzyy-Yuang Shiang
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2013-03-16       Impact factor: 2.840

View more
  14 in total

1.  Biomechanics of running: A special reference to the comparisons of wearing boots and running shoes.

Authors:  Alireza Shamsoddini; Mohammad Taghi Hollisaz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 3.752

2.  What are the Benefits and Risks Associated with Changing Foot Strike Pattern During Running? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Injury, Running Economy, and Biomechanics.

Authors:  Laura M Anderson; Daniel R Bonanno; Harvi F Hart; Christian J Barton
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Running speed-induced changes in foot contact pattern influence impact loading rate.

Authors:  Bastiaan Breine; Philippe Malcolm; Samuel Galle; Pieter Fiers; Edward C Frederick; Dirk De Clercq
Journal:  Eur J Sport Sci       Date:  2018-11-03       Impact factor: 3.980

4.  Vertical Loading Rate Is Not Associated with Running Injury, Regardless of Calculation Method.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Schmida; Christa M Wille; Mikel R Stiffler-Joachim; Stephanie A Kliethermes; Bryan C Heiderscheit
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2022-03-22

5.  Ground reaction force metrics are not strongly correlated with tibial bone load when running across speeds and slopes: Implications for science, sport and wearable tech.

Authors:  Emily S Matijevich; Lauren M Branscombe; Leon R Scott; Karl E Zelik
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-17       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Foot Pronation Contributes to Altered Lower Extremity Loading After Long Distance Running.

Authors:  Qichang Mei; Yaodong Gu; Liangliang Xiang; Julien S Baker; Justin Fernandez
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 4.566

7.  Transition to forefoot strike reduces load rates more effectively than altered cadence.

Authors:  Erin E Futrell; K Douglas Gross; Darcy Reisman; David R Mullineaux; Irene S Davis
Journal:  J Sport Health Sci       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 7.179

8.  Abnormal Gait Detection Using Wearable Hall-Effect Sensors.

Authors:  Courtney Chheng; Denise Wilson
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 3.576

9.  Predicting continuous ground reaction forces from accelerometers during uphill and downhill running: a recurrent neural network solution.

Authors:  Ryan S Alcantara; W Brent Edwards; Guillaume Y Millet; Alena M Grabowski
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 2.984

10.  Effects of Foot Strike Techniques on Running Biomechanics: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yilin Xu; Peng Yuan; Ran Wang; Dan Wang; Jia Liu; Hui Zhou
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2020-08-19       Impact factor: 3.843

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.