| Literature DB >> 34767609 |
Yiyan Cui1,2,3,4,5, Jiazhou Li1,2,3,4,5, Dun Deng1,2,3,4,5, Huijie Lu1,2,3,4,5, Zhimei Tian1,2,3,4,5, Zhichang Liu1,2,3,4,5, Xianyong Ma1,2,3,4,5,6.
Abstract
This study evaluated the ability of Aspergillus niger and Trichoderma koningii to improve the quality of tea dregs (TDs) through solid-state fermentation as well as the value of the fermented tea dregs (FTDs) produced for use as bio-feed additives. After fermentation, FTDs differed in color and structure. Fermentation with A. niger and T. koningii increased the contents of crude protein, crude fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and acid detergent fiber of TDs. Compared to the unfermented group, the contents of reducing sugar, total flavonoids, total polyphenols, and theasaponins were increased in A. niger FTDs, while in T. koningii FTDs caffeine was completely degraded, the theasaponins were lower, and the contents of reducing sugar and caffeine higher. Regarding free amino acids, A. niger FTDs had the highest content of total amino acids, total essential amino acids, total non-essential amino acids, total aromatic amino acids, total branched-chain amino acids, and total non-protein amino acids, and all types of essential amino acids, followed by T. koningii FTDs and the control TDs. Fungal fermentation had similar effects on the content of various hydrolytic amino acids as those on above free amino acids, and increased the content of bitter and umami components. The composition of essential amino acids of TDs or FTDs was similar to that of the standard model, except for sulfur-containing amino acids and isoleucine. Solid-state fermentation with A. niger and T. koningii effectively improved the nutritional value of TDs, increased the contents of functional substances, and improved the flavor of TDs. This study demonstrated a feasible approach to utilize TDs that not only increases animal feed resources, but also reduces the production of resource waste and pollution.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34767609 PMCID: PMC8589212 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260045
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Characteristics (freeze-dried) in the fermented tea dregs.
Proximate components, minerals, and bioactive substances in the fermented tea dregs.
| Items | Control | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
|
| 391 ± 3.5a | 344 ± 6.3b | 297 ± 6.87c | <0.001 |
|
| 230 ± 4.24c | 265 ± 3.3b | 307 ± 3.3a | <0.001 |
|
| 29 ± 4.0 | 33 ± 4.4 | 33 ± 4.0 | 0.242 |
|
| 182 ± 3.4c | 223 ± 3.8a | 197 ± 12.2b | <0.001 |
|
| 439 ± 5.8c | 493 ± 10.9a | 463 ± 5.5b | <0.001 |
|
| 242 ± 6.5c | 295 ± 5.1a | 268 ± 22.6b | <0.001 |
|
| 32 ± 0.4c | 38 ± 0.5b | 41 ± 0.5a | <0.001 |
|
| 709 ± 2.4a | 666 ± 6.8b | 618 ± 4.1c | <0.001 |
|
| ||||
|
| 5333 ± 68.4b | 6378 ± 121.9a | 6834 ± 90.2a | <0.001 |
|
| 6056 ± 68.4b | 6699 ± 85.4a | 6927 ± 88.0a | <0.001 |
|
| 3969 ± 77.46c | 4940 ± 54.6b | 5332 ± 87.1a | <0.001 |
|
| 1610 ± 23.0c | 2048 ± 80.6b | 2192 ± 31.9a | <0.001 |
|
| 970 ± 7.55c | 1193 ± 16.0b | 1311 ± 47.41a | <0.001 |
|
| 431 ± 14.8c | 467 ± 7.9b | 565 ± 12.6a | <0.001 |
|
| 26 ± 1.2c | 32 ± 0.8b | 34 ± 1.2a | <0.001 |
|
| 10 ± 0.8b | 14 ± 0.8a | 15 ± 0.8a | <0.001 |
|
| ND | ND | ND | − |
|
| ||||
|
| 7.40 ± 0.33c | 17.96 ± 0.46a | 14.43 ± 0.58b | <0.001 |
|
| 10.14 ± 0.33b | 9.89 ± 0.36b | 13.15 ± 0.67a | <0.001 |
|
| 6.33 ± 0.22b | 5.82 ± 0.40b | 12.85 ± 0.49a | <0.001 |
|
| 264.33 ± 16.40b | 221.26 ± 3.35c | 291.63 ± 17.52a | <0.001 |
|
| 124.16 ± 2.51b | 146.22 ± 4.39a | ND | <0.001 |
Means with different letters in the same row (a–c) indicated a significant difference according to Duncan’s multiple comparison tests at P< 0.05.
1DM, dry mass; NDF, neutral detergent fiber; ADF, acid detergent fiber; ND, value under detection limits; GAE, gallic acid equivalent; RE, rutin equivalent.
Feeding value of fermentation products.
| Items | Control | Alfalfa2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 64.19 ± 0.48a | 60.24 ± 0.38c | 62.23 ± 0.27b | <0.001 | 56−58 |
|
| 70.05 ± 0.50a | 65.95 ± 0.40c | 68.01 ± 0.28b | <0.001 | 47.23−49.25 |
|
| 2.74 ± 0.04a | 2.43 ± 0.06c | 2.59 ± 0.03b | <0.001 | 2.88−3.19 |
|
| 149 ± 2.9a | 125 ± 3.5c | 137 ± 2.0b | <0.001 | 108−117 |
|
| 143 ± 2.9a | 119 ± 3.4c | 131 ± 1.9b | <0.001 | 130−150 |
Means with different letters in the same row (a–c) indicated a significant difference according to Duncan’s multiple comparison tests at P< 0.05.
1 TDN, total digestible nutrient; DDM, digestibility of dry matter; DMI, dry matter intake; RFV, relative feed value; RFQ, relative forage quality.
2 Feeding value of alfalfa was according to Xiong et al. [29].
Free radical scavenging activity (%) of different solvent extracts from fermented tea dregs.
| Items | Vitamin C | Control | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
|
| 90.36 ± 0.28a | 86.72 ± 0.31b | 86.84 ± 0.43b | 87.48 ± 1.07b | <0.001 |
|
| 88.19 ± 0.19a | 64.17 ± 2.11c | 82.47 ± 4.46b | 80.89 ± 5.59b | <0.001 |
|
| 76.79 ± 2.11a | 35.37 ± 3.57c | 35.32 ± 2.70c | 59.56 ± 4.89b | <0.001 |
|
| |||||
|
| 90.36 ± 0.28a | 79.75 ± 0.82d | 81.81 ± 1.43c | 86.79 ± 0.87b | <0.001 |
|
| 88.19 ± 0.19 | 85.03 ± 0.87 | 83.37 ± 2.41 | 84.21 ± 2.93 | 0.212 |
|
| 76.79 ± 2.11a | 18.07 ± 2.13d | 24.92 ± 1.42c | 44.02 ± 1.51b | <0.001 |
|
| |||||
|
| 90.36 ± 0.28a | 71.52 ± 0.57b | 69.43 ± 1.17c | 69.04 ± 1.82c | <0.001 |
|
| 88.19 ± 0.19a | 72.08 ± 7.08b | 84.34 ± 8.19a | 78.13 ± 9.95ab | 0.045 |
|
| 76.79 ± 2.11a | 20.06 ± 0.87c | 28.54 ± 1.64b | 76.00 ± 5.08a | <0.001 |
Means with different letters in the same row (a–c) indicated a significant difference according to Duncan’s multiple comparison tests at P< 0.05.
1 DPPH, 2, 2-diphenyl-1-picrylhy-drazyl; ABTS, 2,2-azinobis-3-ethylben-zothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid diammonium salt.
Fig 2Free amino acids in the fermented tea dregs.
TAA, total amino acids; TEAA, total essential amino acids; TNEAA, total non-essential amino acids; TAAA, total aromatic amino acids; TBCAA, total branched-chain amino acids; TNPAA, total non-protein amino acids. Values with the same letters were not significantly different (P< 0.05).
Flavored components in the fermented tea dregs.
| Items | Control | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 281.67 ± 9.11c | 999.06 ± 40.58b | 1462.97 ± 177.63a | <0.001 |
|
| 222.25 ± 6.83b | 270.31 ± 12.29b | 655.77 ± 74.85a | <0.001 |
|
| 254.56 ± 11.87c | 527.17 ± 27.75b | 1780.04 ± 122.78a | <0.001 |
|
| 402.65 ± 59.89b | 458.02 ± 60.82b | 2017.03 ± 418.90a | <0.001 |
|
| 0.24 ± 0.02b | 0.44 ± 0.02a | 0.25 ± 0.02b | <0.001 |
|
| 0.19 ± 0.01a | 0.12 ± 0.00b | 0.11 ± 0.00b | <0.001 |
|
| 0.22 ± 0.01b | 0.23 ± 0.01b | 0.31 ± 0.02a | <0.001 |
|
| 0.35 ± 0.03a | 0.20 ± 0.02b | 0.34 ± 0.04a | <0.001 |
Means with different letters in the same row (a–c) indicated a significant difference according to Duncan’s multiple comparison tests at P< 0.05.
1 TAA, total amino acids; TUC, total umami components, aspartate + glutamate; TSC, total sweet components, alanine + glycine + serine + threonine; TBC, total bitter components, arginine + histidine + isoleucine + leucine + methionine + phenylalanine + valine; TTC, total tasteless components, TTC = TAA − TUC–TSC− TBC.
Fig 3Hydrolytic amino acids in the fermented tea dregs.
TAA, total amino acids; TEAA, total essential amino acids; TNEAA, total non-essential amino acids; TAAA, total aromatic amino acids; TBCAA, total branched-chain amino acids. Values with the same letters were not significantly different (P< 0.05).
Essential amino acids composition of fermentation products.
| Items | Control | Egg protein | FAO pattern | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 7.2 ± 0.05b | 7.5 ± 0.04a | 7.4 ± 0.29ab | 0.029 | 6.4 | 5.5 |
|
| 0.2 ± 0.02c | 0.3 ± 0.02b | 0.4 ± 0.03a | <0.001 | 5.5 | 3.5 |
|
| 4.3 ± 0.12b | 4.4 ± 0.09ab | 4.6 ± 0.18a | 0.005 | 5.1 | 4 |
|
| 7.5 ± 0.07 | 7.7 ± 0.05 | 7.7 ± 0.31 | 0.123 | 7.3 | 5 |
|
| 11.2 ± 0.24a | 10.6 ± 0.10b | 10.6 ± 0.40b | 0.006 | 8.8 | 7 |
|
| 0.5 ± 0.08b | 0.5 ± 0.03b | 0.8 ± 0.02a | <0.001 | 6.6 | 4 |
|
| 9.2 ± 0.12b | 9.0 ± 0.09b | 9.6 ± 0.36a | 0.001 | 10 | 6 |
|
| 45.5 ± 0.29 | 45.8 ± 0.11 | 46.5 ± 1.85 | 0.275 | 49.7 | 35 |
Means with different letters in the same row (a–c) indicated a significant difference according to Duncan’s multiple comparison tests at P< 0.05.
1 TEAA, total essential amino acids.
2 Egg protein was according to Li et al. [35].
3 FAO pattern, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, was according to FAO/WHO [36].