| Literature DB >> 29862295 |
B S M S Siriwardena1, I K Rambukewela1, T N Pitakotuwage1, M N G P K Udagama1, P V R Kumarasiri2, W M Tilakaratne1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Developing histological prediction models that estimate the probability of developing metastatic deposit will help clinicians to identify individuals who need either radical or prophylactic neck dissection, which leads to better prognosis. Identification of accurate predictive models in oral cancer is important to overcome extensive prophylactic surgical management for neck nodes. Therefore, accurate prediction of metastasis in oral cancer would have an immediate clinical impact, especially to avoid unnecessary radical treatment of patients who are at a low risk of metastasis.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29862295 PMCID: PMC5971289 DOI: 10.1155/2018/8925818
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Relationship of tumour differentiation with age, sex, and tumour site.
| Well-differentiated SCC (%) | Moderately differentiated SCC (%) | Poorly differentiated SCC (%) | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age groups | ||||
| 20–40 | 9 (45) | 11 (50) | 1 (5) | 21 |
| 41–50 | 34 (38) | 49 (55) | 6 (7) | 89 |
| 51–60 | 88 (50) | 70 (40) | 18 (10) | 176 |
| 61–70 | 71 (53) | 57 (42) | 7 (5) | 135 |
| 71–86 | 23 (52) | 19 (43) | 2 (6) | 44 |
|
| ||||
| Gender | ||||
| Male | 153 | 153 | 23 | 329 |
| Female | 72 | 53 | 11 | 136 |
|
| ||||
| Primary site | ||||
| BM | 104 (60) | 58 (33.5) | 11 (6.4) | 173 |
| FOM | 19 (44.2) | 24 (55.8) | 0 (0) | 43 |
| LALR | 47 (50.5) | 44 (47.3) | 2 (2.2) | 93 |
| P | 6 (25) | 11 (45.8) | 7 (29) | 24 |
| T | 43 (38.4) | 57 (50.9) | 12 (10.7) | 112 |
| UALR | 6 (30) | 12 (60) | 2 (10) | 20 |
BM: buccal mucosa, FOM: floor of the mouth, LALR: lower alveolar ridge, P: palate, T: tongue, UALR: upper alveolar ridge.
The relationship between clinicopathological parameters and nodal status in patients with OSCC.
| Variable | Frequency (%) | Positive nodes (%) | Extra capsular invasion (%) |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | ||||
| 20–40 | 21 (4.5) | 11 (52.3) | 11 | NS |
| 41–50 | 90 (14.35) | 42 (46.6) | 31 | |
| 51–60 | 177 (38.06) | 82 (46.3) | 60 | |
| 61–70 | 133 (28.6) | 54 (40.6) | 40 | |
| 71–86 | 44 (9.4) | 19 (43.18) | 17 | |
|
| ||||
| Gender | ||||
| Male | 329 (69.8) | 149 (45.3) | 110 | NS |
| Female | 136 (29.2) | 60 (44.1) | 50 | |
|
| ||||
| Primary site | ||||
| BM | 173 (37.2) | 66 (38.15) | 53 | NS |
| FOM | 43 (9.2) | 19 (4.1) | 12 | |
| LLR | 93 (20) | 39 (41.9) | 28 | |
| P | 24 (5.2) | 21 (87.5) | 19 | |
| T | 112 (24.1) | 52 (46.4) | 39 | |
| UALR | 20 (4.3) | 12 (60) | 9 | |
|
| ||||
| Tumour stage | ||||
| 1 | 17 (5.68) | 0 (0) | 0 | 0.001 |
| 2 | 54 (18.06) | 1 (1.8) | 1 | |
| 3 | 98 (32.77) | 49 (50) | 30 | |
| 4 | 130 (43.47) | 87 (66.9) | 78 | |
|
| ||||
| Tumour differentiation | ||||
| Well | 225 (48.4) | 51 (26.7) | 36 | 0.001 |
| Moderate | 206 (44.3) | 124 (60.2) | 92 | |
| Poor | 34 (7.3) | 23 (67.7) | 20 | |
|
| ||||
| Invasive front | ||||
| Inv. I | 7 (1.5) | 0 (0) | 0 | 0.001 |
| Inv. II | 142 (30.53) | 28 (19.7) | 17 | |
| Inv. III | 200 (43.01) | 102 (51) | 76 | |
| Inv. IV | 113 (24.3) | 79 (69.91) | 67 | |
Chi-square test. NS: not significant.
Figure 1BM: buccal mucosa, FOM: floor of the mouth, LALR: lower alveolar ridge, P: palate, T: tongue, UALR: upper alveolar ridge. I, II, III, and IV: pattern of invasion types at the advancing front of the tumour.
The final regression model identifies differentiation, invasion, and stage as the predictors of the level of positivity in OSCC.
|
| ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | Unstandardized coefficients | Standardized coefficients |
| Sig. | ||
|
| Std. error | Beta | ||||
| (1) | (Constant) | −1.182 | .231 | −5.123 | .000 | |
| stage | .711 | .071 | .505 | 10.071 | .000 | |
|
| ||||||
| (2) | (Constant) | −2.605 | .293 | −8.902 | .000 | |
| Stage | .620 | .067 | .440 | 9.320 | .000 | |
| Invasion | .573 | .081 | .336 | 7.113 | .000 | |
|
| ||||||
| (3) |
| −2.642 | .291 | −9.081 | .000 | |
|
| .611 | .066 | .434 | 9.226 | .000 | |
|
| .446 | .097 | .261 | 4.600 | .000 | |
|
| .268 | .116 | .131 | 2.322 | .021 | |
aDependent variable: level of nodal positivity. Adjusted R-squared = 0.368; the final regression model (3).
A model developed to predict lymph node metastasis in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma of buccal mucosa.
| Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 4 | Level 5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IP 1 + S 3 | √ | ||||
| IP 2 + S 1 | √ | ||||
| IP 2 + S 2 | √ | ||||
|
| |||||
| IP 1 + S 4 | √ | ||||
| IP 2 + S 3 | √ | ||||
| IP 3 + S 1 | √ | ||||
| IP 3 + S 2 | √ | ||||
|
| |||||
| IP 2 + S 4 | √ | ||||
| IP 3 + S 3 | √ | ||||
| IP 4 + S 1 | √ | ||||
| IP 4 + S 2 | √ | ||||
|
| |||||
| IP 3 + S 4 | √ | ||||
| IP 4 + S 3 | √ | ||||
|
| |||||
| IP 4 + S 4 | √ | ||||
IP: pattern of invasion; S: stage of the tumour.