| Literature DB >> 36193309 |
Wenao Chen1, Ruijie Zeng1, Yiyao Jin1, Xi Sun1, Zihan Zhou2, Chao Zhu3.
Abstract
The incidence of oral cancer is still increasing. It has become very common in patients with malignant tumors, which has forced medical personnel to continuously explore its treatment methods. What kind of method can effectively and correctly diagnose the disease in the early stage and improve the survival rate has become one of the research topics that have attracted much attention. Aiming at this problem, it has great research significance for the field of oral precancerous lesions diagnosis. With the in-depth research on oral precancerous diagnosis, the research on artificial neural network (ANN) in medical diagnosis is gradually carried out. Its performance advantage is of great significance to solve the problem of early and correct disease diagnosis. This paper aimed to investigate the application of ANN-assisted cancer risk prediction method in risk prediction of oral precancerous lesions. Through the analysis and research of ANN and oral cancer, the construction of oral cancer risk prediction model was applied to solve the problem of improving the survival rate of oral cancer patients. In this paper, ANN and oral precancerous lesions were analyzed, the performance of the algorithm was experimentally analyzed, and the relevant theoretical formulas were used to explain. The results showed that the method had higher accuracy than traditional forecasting methods. When N = 2, the output accuracy was above 90%. It can be seen that the algorithm can meet the needs of the diagnosis of high-risk groups of oral cancer lesions, and the diagnosis efficiency and patient survival rate has been greatly improved.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36193309 PMCID: PMC9526607 DOI: 10.1155/2022/7352489
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.246
Figure 1Common oral precancerous lesions.
Figure 2ANN application areas.
Figure 3Features of ANN.
Figure 4BPNN algorithm flow.
Partial raw data of the case dataset.
| Project | Case sample1 | Case sample2 | Case sample3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Year of birth | 1976 | 1988 | 1964 |
| Age | 46 | 34 | 58 |
| Gender | Male | Male | Female |
| Smokes | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Oral disease | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| True value of cancer | 0.17 | 0.04 | 0.34 |
Partial data after normalization.
| Project | Case sample1 | Case sample2 | Case sample3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Year of birth | 0.635 | 0.514 | 0.684 |
| Age | 0.614 | 0.498 | 0.674 |
| Gender | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Smokes | 0.514 | 0 | 0.547 |
| Oral disease | 0.741 | 0.671 | 0.657 |
| True value of cancer | 0.17 | 0.04 | 0.34 |
Figure 5Model prediction results.
Summary of results.
| Train | Sum of squares error | 15.347 |
|---|---|---|
| Error rate | 7.5% | |
| Training time | 46 s | |
| Text | Sum of squares error | 9.324 |
| Error rate | 5.7% |
Figure 6Training and test samples predict pseudo-probabilities.
Figure 7Abnormal discrimination test results on oral mucosal smear.
Figure 8Detection results of autoluminescent fluorescent substances in oral cells and tissues.