Literature DB >> 19455494

Assessment of outcomes after hip arthroplasty.

Vikki Wylde1, Ashley W Blom.   

Abstract

Because of the ever-increasing prevalence of joint replacement, it is important that patient outcomes after surgery are continuously reviewed and monitored, with the aim of optimising outcomes after surgery. Of central importance in assessing outcomes is choosing the most appropriate outcome measure. This article reviews five methods of assessing outcomes after hip arthroplasty, namely radiographic analysis, implant survivorship analysis, surgeon-based outcome measures, performance-related assessment and patient-reported outcome measures. The relative strengths and weaknesses of each method of assessment are discussed, with the aim of aiding the surgeon or researcher in choosing an outcome measure when designing a clinical trial.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19455494     DOI: 10.1177/112070000901900101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hip Int        ISSN: 1120-7000            Impact factor:   2.135


  3 in total

1.  No decline in high patient satisfaction after total hip arthroplasty at long-term follow-up.

Authors:  P P Schmitz; J L C van Susante; A Hol; R Brokelman; C J M van Loon
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2018-06-01

2.  A new and simple intraoperative method for correction of leg-length discrepancy in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Hiroaki Tagomori; Nobuhiro Kaku; Tomonori Tabata; Hiroshi Tsumura
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2019-05-01

Review 3.  Patient-reported outcome measures after total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Authors:  P N Ramkumar; J D Harris; P C Noble
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 5.853

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.