Literature DB >> 29858208

Isolation of Toxigenic Clostridium difficile from Animal Manure and Composts Being Used as Biological Soil Amendments.

Muthu Dharmasena1, Xiuping Jiang2.   

Abstract

The well-known nosocomial pathogen Clostridium difficile has recently been recognized as a community-associated pathogen. As livestock animals carry and shed C. difficile in their feces, animal manure-based composts may play an important role in disseminating toxigenic C. difficile strains into the agricultural environment. The present study surveyed C. difficile contamination of commercially available composts and animal manure. Presumptive C. difficile isolates were confirmed by testing for the tpi housekeeping gene in addition to Gram staining. The confirmed C. difficile isolates were further tested for toxigenicity, PCR ribotype, and susceptibilities to selected antibiotics. C. difficile was found in 51 out of 142 samples (36%). A total of 58 C. difficile strains were isolated from those 51 positive compost/manure samples. The presence of C. difficile in compost did not significantly correlate (P > 0.05) with the physical and most microbiological parameters, including the presence of fecal coliforms. The majority of C. difficile isolates were toxigenic, with 63.8% positive for the toxin A gene (tcdA) and 67.2% positive for the toxin B gene (tcdB). Only 3 isolates (5.17%) were positive for the binary toxins. There were 38 different PCR ribotypes among the 58 C. difficile isolates, and ribotype 106 was the most prevalent, followed by ribotypes 020 and 412. All C. difficile isolates were susceptible to the selected antibiotics, but >50% of the isolates had reduced susceptibility to clindamycin by the agar dilution method. This study indicates that compost may be a reservoir of toxigenic C. difficile strains.IMPORTANCEClostridium difficile infection (CDI) is a leading cause of antibiotic-associated diarrhea in health care facilities in developed countries. Extended hospital stays and recurrences severely increase the cost of treatments and the high mortality rate that is observed among the elderly. Community-associated CDI cases that occur without any recent contact with the hospital environment are increasing. Studies have reported the isolation of virulent C. difficile strains from water, soil, meat, vegetables, pets, livestock animals, and animal manure. The objective of this study was to isolate and characterize C. difficile strains from animal manure and commercially available compost products. Our results demonstrate that not only unprocessed animal manure but also finished composts made of different feedstocks can serve as a reservoir for C. difficile as well. Most importantly, our study revealed that properly processed compost is a potential source of toxigenic and clindamycin-resistant C. difficile isolates.
Copyright © 2018 American Society for Microbiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  C. difficile; animal manure; antimicrobial resistance; compost; ribotyping; toxigenicity

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29858208      PMCID: PMC6070769          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.00738-18

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  34 in total

Review 1.  Setting and revising antibacterial susceptibility breakpoints.

Authors:  John Turnidge; David L Paterson
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 2.  Editorial: assessing the antimicrobial susceptibility of bacteria obtained from animals.

Authors:  Stefan Schwarz; Peter Silley; Shabbir Simjee; Neil Woodford; Engeline van Duijkeren; Alan P Johnson; Wim Gaastra
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2010-02-24       Impact factor: 5.790

3.  Prevalence of antimicrobial resistance and association with toxin genes in Clostridium difficile in commercial swine.

Authors:  Siddhartha Thakur; Michelle Putnam; Pamela R Fry; Melanie Abley; Wondwossen A Gebreyes
Journal:  Am J Vet Res       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.156

4.  Survival and prevalence of Clostridium difficile in manure compost derived from pigs.

Authors:  Masaru Usui; Mayuko Kawakura; Nobuki Yoshizawa; Lai Lai San; Chie Nakajima; Yasuhiko Suzuki; Yutaka Tamura
Journal:  Anaerobe       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 3.331

5.  Antimicrobial susceptibility and resistance mechanisms of clinical Clostridium difficile from a Chinese tertiary hospital.

Authors:  Danfeng Dong; Lihua Zhang; Xu Chen; Cen Jiang; Beiqin Yu; Xuefeng Wang; Yibing Peng
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2012-11-11       Impact factor: 5.283

6.  Occurrence of Clostridium perfringens from different cultivated soils.

Authors:  C Voidarou; E Bezirtzoglou; A Alexopoulos; S Plessas; C Stefanis; I Papadopoulos; S Vavias; E Stavropoulou; K Fotou; A Tzora; I Skoufos
Journal:  Anaerobe       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 3.331

7.  Contamination of ready-to-eat raw vegetables with Clostridium difficile in France.

Authors:  Catherine Eckert; Béatrice Burghoffer; Frédéric Barbut
Journal:  J Med Microbiol       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 2.472

8.  Antimicrobial susceptibility of Clostridium difficile isolated from food animals on farms.

Authors:  S N Thitaram; J F Frank; G R Siragusa; J S Bailey; D A Dargatz; J E Lombard; C A Haley; S A Lyon; P J Fedorka-Cray
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 5.277

9.  Clostridium difficile in ready-to-eat salads, Scotland.

Authors:  Marwah M Bakri; Derek J Brown; John P Butcher; Alistair D Sutherland
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 6.883

10.  Horizontal gene transfer converts non-toxigenic Clostridium difficile strains into toxin producers.

Authors:  Michael S M Brouwer; Adam P Roberts; Haitham Hussain; Rachel J Williams; Elaine Allan; Peter Mullany
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  4 in total

1.  Clostridioides difficile ribotype 106: A systematic review of the antimicrobial susceptibility, genetics, and clinical outcomes of this common worldwide strain.

Authors:  T J Carlson; D Blasingame; A J Gonzales-Luna; F Alnezary; K W Garey
Journal:  Anaerobe       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 3.331

Review 2.  Clostridium difficile Infection: An Epidemiology Update.

Authors:  Ana C De Roo; Scott E Regenbogen
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2020-02-25

3.  High Prevalence of Clostridium difficile in Home Gardens in Western Australia.

Authors:  Nirajmohan Shivaperumal; Barbara J Chang; Thomas V Riley
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2020-12-17       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Clostridium difficile beyond stools: dog nasal discharge as a possible new vector of bacterial transmission.

Authors:  C Rodriguez; B Taminiau; L Bouchafa; S Romijn; J Van Broeck; M Delmée; C Clercx; G Daube
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2019-05-13
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.