Literature DB >> 27043382

Antimicrobial susceptibility of Clostridium difficile isolated from food animals on farms.

S N Thitaram1, J F Frank2, G R Siragusa3, J S Bailey4, D A Dargatz5, J E Lombard5, C A Haley5, S A Lyon4, P J Fedorka-Cray4.   

Abstract

Clostridium difficile is commonly associated with a spectrum of disease in humans referred to as C. difficile-associated disease (CDAD) and use of antimicrobials is considered a risk factor for development of disease in humans. C. difficile can also inhabit healthy food animals and transmission to humans is possible. As a result of the complexity and cost of testing, C. difficile is rarely tested for antimicrobial susceptibility. A total of 376 C. difficile strains (94 each from swine and dairy feces, and 188 from beef cattle feces) were isolated from healthy food animals on farms during studies conducted by the National Animal Health Monitoring System. Using the Etest (AB Biodisk, Solna, Sweden), samples were tested for susceptibility to nine antimicrobials implicated as risk factors for CDAD (linezolid, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, ampicillin, clindamycin, erythromycin, levofloxacin, metronidazole, rifampicin, and vancomycin). Vancomycin was active against all isolates of C. difficile (MIC90=3.0μg/ml) while almost all isolates (n=369; 98.1%) were resistant to levofloxacin. With the exception of vancomycin, resistance varied by animal species as follows: linezolid (8.5% resistance among swine versus 2.1 and 1.1% resistance among dairy and beef, respectively), clindamycin (56.4% resistance among swine versus 80% and 90.9% resistance among dairy and beef, respectively), and rifampicin (2.1% and 0% resistance among swine and dairy cattle isolates, respectively versus 14.3% resistance among beef isolates). Regardless of species, multiple drug resistance was observed most often to combinations of clindamycin and levofloxacin (n=195; 51.9%) and ampicillin, clindamycin and levofloxacin (n=41; 10.9%). The reason for the variability of resistance between animal species is unknown and requires further research. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antimicrobial susceptibility; Beef cattle; Clostridium difficile; Dairy cattle; Swine

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27043382     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2016.03.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol        ISSN: 0168-1605            Impact factor:   5.277


  5 in total

1.  Isolation of Toxigenic Clostridium difficile from Animal Manure and Composts Being Used as Biological Soil Amendments.

Authors:  Muthu Dharmasena; Xiuping Jiang
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Characterisation and Antibiotic Susceptibility Profile of Clostridioides (Clostridium) Difficile Isolated from Chicken Carcasses.

Authors:  Enver Baris Bingol; Hamparsun Hampikyan; Karlo Muratoglu; Esra Akkaya; Omer Cetin; Hilal Colak
Journal:  J Vet Res       Date:  2020-08-11       Impact factor: 1.744

3.  Insect-based diet, a promising nutritional source, modulates gut microbiota composition and SCFAs production in laying hens.

Authors:  Luca Borrelli; Lorena Coretti; Ludovico Dipineto; Fulvia Bovera; Francesca Menna; Lorenzo Chiariotti; Antonio Nizza; Francesca Lembo; Alessandro Fioretti
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-24       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Prevalence and characteristics of extended-spectrum β-lactamases-producing Escherichia coli from broiler chickens at different day-age.

Authors:  Xiaoqiang Liu; Xueqi Wei; Li Liu; Xiaolan Feng; Zhengqi Shao; Zilong Han; Yinqian Li
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2020-04-25       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Detection, Characterization and Antibiotic Susceptibility of Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile in Meat Products.

Authors:  Karlo Muratoglu; Esra Akkaya; Hamparsun Hampikyan; Enver Baris Bingol; Omer Cetin; Hilal Colak
Journal:  Food Sci Anim Resour       Date:  2020-07-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.