| Literature DB >> 29857569 |
Katsuki Toda1,2, Seiichi Uno3, Emiko Kokushi4, Ayaka Shiiba5,6, Hiroshi Hasunuma7, Daisaku Matsumoto8, Masayuki Ohtani9, Osamu Yamato10, Urara Shinya11, Missaka Wijayagunawardane12, Johanna Fink-Gremmels13, Masayasu Taniguchi14,15, Mitsuhiro Takagi16,17.
Abstract
The potential effect of difructose anhydride III (DFA III) supplementation in cattle feed was evaluated using a previously developed urinary-zearalenone (ZEN) monitoring system. Japanese Black cattle from two beef herds aged 9⁻10 months were used. DFA III was supplemented for two weeks. ZEN concentrations in feed were similar in both herds (0.27 and 0.22 mg/kg in roughage and concentrates, respectively), and below the maximum allowance in Japan. ZEN, α-zearalenol (α-ZOL), and β-ZOL concentrations in urine were measured using LC/MS/MS the day before DFA III administration, 9 and 14 days thereafter, and 9 days after supplementation ceased. Significant differences in ZEN, α-ZOL, β-ZOL, and total ZEN were recorded on different sampling dates. The concentration of inorganic phosphate in DFA III-supplemented animals was significantly higher than in controls on day 23 (8.4 vs. 7.7 mg/dL), suggesting a possible role of DFA III in tight junction of intestinal epithelial cells. This is the first evidence that DFA III reduces mycotoxin levels reaching the systemic circulation and excreted in urine. This preventive effect may involve an improved tight-junction-dependent intestinal barrier function. Additionally, our practical approach confirmed that monitoring of urinary mycotoxin is useful for evaluating the effects of dietary supplements to prevent mycotoxin adsorption.Entities:
Keywords: DFA III; blood; cattle; mycotoxin; tight-junction; urine
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29857569 PMCID: PMC6024752 DOI: 10.3390/toxins10060223
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Toxins (Basel) ISSN: 2072-6651 Impact factor: 4.546
Figure 1Results for the analysis of urinary concentrations of ZEN, α-ZOL, β-ZOL, and total ZEN (ΣZEN; ZEN + α-ZOL + β-ZOL) during the experimental period, with (DFA III group) or without DFA III supplementation (control group). * Significant difference (p < 0.05) between DFA III group and control group on each day. ** Significant difference (p < 0.01) between DFA III group and control group on each day.
Figure 2Results for the concentration of serum Pi, Ca, and Mg during the experimental period with (DFA III group) and without DFA III supplementation (control group). ** Significant difference (p < 0.05) between DFA III group and control group.
Composition of feed provided to the two herds kept for fattening purposes.
| Herd | Forage Feed, kg | Formula Feed | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total, kg | Bran, % | Cereal, % | Oil Seed Meal, % | Other, % | TDN, % | CP, % | ||
| Herd 1 | Straw 2.0, Timothy grass 2.0 | 3 | 24 | 46 | 16 | 14 | >70.0 | >16 |
| Herd 2 | Straw 2.0, Oats 2.0 | 2 | 27 | 56 | 7 | 10 | >71.5 | >14 |
TDN: total digestible nutrients, CP: crude protein.
Figure 3Experimental protocol for DFA III supplementation in dietary feed and sampling of blood and urine.