Literature DB >> 29855985

Optimal timing for pegfilgrastim administration in Japanese breast cancer patients receiving intermediate-risk chemotherapies.

Tatsuya Hayama1,2, Kenichi Sakurai3, Katsuhiro Miura4,5, Shinsaku Washinosu1, Shinya Tsuboi1,2, Akihiro Uchiike1,2, Yoshikazu Yoshida1, Masami Takei6.   

Abstract

Background Pegfilgrastim is widely used for prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia (FN) in cancer patients receiving chemotherapies. However, the optimal timing of pegfilgrastim administration has not been established. Objective We investigated the effect of the timing of pegfilgrastim administration on the prevention of FN in patients with breast cancer undergoing intermediate-risk chemotherapies. Method We retrospectively analysed the incidence of FN in patients with breast cancer treated at our institution with intermediate-risk chemotherapies and primary or secondary prophylactic pegfilgrastim between 2015 and 2017. The impact of the timing of pegfilgrastim administration on the incidence of FN was evaluated by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. Results Overall, 87 patients received a total of 318 chemotherapy cycles with pegfilgrastim, and 14 patients (16%) experienced FN. In univariate analyses, day 2 pegfilgrastim administration, age of > 65 years, baseline haemoglobin < 12 g/dL, prior history of FN, and presence of recurrent/metastatic disease trended toward an association with FN. Adjustment for these confounding risk factors revealed that day 2 pegfilgrastim administration was associated with a significantly increased risk of FN (odds ratio 11.0, p = 0.009). Conclusion Administrating pegfilgrastim on day 3 or later may prevent FN more effectively among Japanese breast cancer patients receiving intermediate-risk chemotherapies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; Febrile neutropenia; Intermediate-risk chemotherapies; Pegfilgrastim

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29855985     DOI: 10.1007/s11096-018-0667-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm


  9 in total

1.  Pertuzumab plus trastuzumab plus docetaxel for metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  José Baselga; Javier Cortés; Sung-Bae Kim; Seock-Ah Im; Roberto Hegg; Young-Hyuck Im; Laslo Roman; José Luiz Pedrini; Tadeusz Pienkowski; Adam Knott; Emma Clark; Mark C Benyunes; Graham Ross; Sandra M Swain
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Evidence-based recommendations for antimicrobial use in febrile neutropenia in Japan: executive summary.

Authors:  Tohru Masaoka
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2004-07-15       Impact factor: 9.079

3.  A randomized double-blind multicenter phase III study of fixed-dose single-administration pegfilgrastim versus daily filgrastim in patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy.

Authors:  M D Green; H Koelbl; J Baselga; A Galid; V Guillem; P Gascon; S Siena; R I Lalisang; H Samonigg; M R Clemens; V Zani; B C Liang; J Renwick; M J Piccart
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 32.976

4.  Risk of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia by day of pegfilgrastim prophylaxis in US clinical practice from 2010 to 2015.

Authors:  Derek Weycker; Mark Bensink; Alexander Lonshteyn; Robin Doroff; David Chandler
Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 2.580

5.  A phase II study of epirubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by weekly paclitaxel with or without trastuzumab as primary systemic therapy in locally advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  Tadao Shimizu; Akira Hirano; Mari Kamimura; Kaoru Ogura; Naomi Kim; Osamu Watanabe; Jun Kinoshita; Kiyomi Kimura; Kenji Ogawa; Mariko Fujibayashi
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.480

6.  Randomized comparison of pegfilgrastim day 4 versus day 2 for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced leukocytopenia.

Authors:  C Zwick; F Hartmann; S Zeynalova; V Pöschel; C Nickenig; M Reiser; E Lengfelder; N Peter; G Schlimok; J Schubert; N Schmitz; M Loeffler; M Pfreundschuh
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2011-02-03       Impact factor: 32.976

Review 7.  Recommendations for the Use of WBC Growth Factors: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Update.

Authors:  Thomas J Smith; Kari Bohlke; Gary H Lyman; Kenneth R Carson; Jeffrey Crawford; Scott J Cross; John M Goldberg; James L Khatcheressian; Natasha B Leighl; Cheryl L Perkins; George Somlo; James L Wade; Antoinette J Wozniak; James O Armitage
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-07-13       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Comparison of pegfilgrastim on day 2 vs. day 4 as primary prophylaxis of intense dose-dense chemotherapy in patients with node-positive primary breast cancer within the prospective, multi-center GAIN study: (GBG 33).

Authors:  Sibylle Loibl; Volkmar Mueller; Gunter von Minckwitz; Bettina Conrad; Claus-Henning Koehne; Stephan Kremers; Helmut Forstbauer; Mattea Linder; Valentina Nekljudova; Volker Moebus
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2010-10-16       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  Dose response of pegfilgrastim in Japanese breast cancer patients receiving six cycles of docetaxel, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide therapy: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Norikazu Masuda; Yutaka Tokuda; Seigo Nakamura; Ryutaro Shimazaki; Yoshinori Ito; Kazuo Tamura
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2015-03-03       Impact factor: 3.603

  9 in total
  1 in total

1.  Clinical Safety and Efficacy of Secondary Prophylactic Pegylated G-CSF in Advanced Pancreatic Cancer Patients Treated with mFOLFIRINOX: A Single-center Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Kentaro Yamao; Mamoru Takenaka; Tomoe Yoshikawa; Rei Ishikawa; Ayana Okamoto; Tomohiro Yamazaki; Atsushi Nakai; Shunsuke Omoto; Ken Kamata; Kosuke Minaga; Satoru Hagiwara; Toshiharu Sakurai; Naoshi Nishida; Yasutaka Chiba; Tomohiro Watanabe; Masatoshi Kudo
Journal:  Intern Med       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 1.271

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.