Literature DB >> 21292644

Randomized comparison of pegfilgrastim day 4 versus day 2 for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced leukocytopenia.

C Zwick1, F Hartmann, S Zeynalova, V Pöschel, C Nickenig, M Reiser, E Lengfelder, N Peter, G Schlimok, J Schubert, N Schmitz, M Loeffler, M Pfreundschuh.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To study the effects of deferring pegfilgrastim until day 4 on the reduction of chemotherapy-induced leukocytopenia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients of age 61-80 years with aggressive lymphoma were randomly assigned to receive 6 mg pegfilgrastim on day 2 or 4 of a 2-week chemotherapy regimen (R-CHOP-14).
RESULTS: Two hundred and ninety-two and 313 chemotherapy cycles were evaluable in 103 patients. Post-nadir pegfilgrastim serum levels were higher after day 4 than after day 2 application. This was associated with an attenuated leukocyte nadir after day 4 pegfilgrastim and there were fewer days with leukocytes <2 × 10(3)/mm(3) compared with day 2 pegfilgrastim. Grade 3 and 4 leukocytopenias (70% versus 43.3%; P < 0.001) and grade 4-only leukocytopenias (47% versus 20.5%; P < 0.001) were more frequent after day 2 pegfilgrastim. There were more chemotherapy cycles with grade 3 and 4 infections after day 2 than day 4 pegfilgrastim (9.4% versus 6.0%; P = 0.118). Interventional antibiotics were given more often after day 2 than after day 4 pegfilgrastim (30.7% versus 21.9% of cycles; P = 0.008). There were five deaths during leukocytopenia after day 2 and none after day 4 pegfilgrastim (P = 0.027).
CONCLUSIONS: Administration of pegfilgrastim on day 4 was more effective in reducing severe leukocytopenias and resulted in fewer deaths during leukocytopenia. Pegfilgrastim should be given on day 4 to better exploit its myeloprotective potential.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21292644     DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdq674

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Oncol        ISSN: 0923-7534            Impact factor:   32.976


  14 in total

1.  Optimal timing for pegfilgrastim administration in Japanese breast cancer patients receiving intermediate-risk chemotherapies.

Authors:  Tatsuya Hayama; Kenichi Sakurai; Katsuhiro Miura; Shinsaku Washinosu; Shinya Tsuboi; Akihiro Uchiike; Yoshikazu Yoshida; Masami Takei
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2018-06-01

2.  Early versus late administration of pegfilgrastim after high-dose chemotherapy and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  C Kahl; H G Sayer; A Hinke; M Freund; J Casper
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-12-25       Impact factor: 4.553

3.  Safety of Same-day Pegfilgrastim Administration in Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer Treated With Cabazitaxel With or Without Carboplatin.

Authors:  Mehmet Asim Bilen; Diana H Cauley; Bradley J Atkinson; Hsiang-Chun Chen; Diana H Kaya; Xuemei Wang; Raghu Vikram; Shi-Ming Tu; Paul G Corn; Jeri Kim
Journal:  Clin Genitourin Cancer       Date:  2016-12-13       Impact factor: 2.872

4.  Pegfilgrastim administration after 24 or 72 or 96 h to allow dose-dense anthracycline- and taxane-based chemotherapy in breast cancer patients: a single-center experience within the GIM2 randomized phase III trial.

Authors:  Matteo Lambertini; Paolo Bruzzi; Francesca Poggio; Simona Pastorino; Giovanni Gardin; Matteo Clavarezza; Claudia Bighin; Paolo Pronzato; Lucia Del Mastro
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 5.  Granulocyte colony-stimulating factors as prophylaxis against febrile neutropenia.

Authors:  Sol Cortés de Miguel; Miguel Ángel Calleja-Hernández; Salomón Menjón-Beltrán; Inmaculada Vallejo-Rodríguez
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 6.  Colony-stimulating factors for febrile neutropenia during cancer therapy.

Authors:  Charles L Bennett; Benjamin Djulbegovic; LeAnn B Norris; James O Armitage
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Personalising docetaxel and G-CSF schedules in cancer patients by a clinically validated computational model.

Authors:  O Vainas; S Ariad; O Amir; W Mermershtain; V Vainstein; M Kleiman; O Inbar; R Ben-Av; A Mukherjee; S Chan; Z Agur
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Significant dose Escalation of Idarubicin in the treatment of aggressive Non- Hodgkin Lymphoma leads to increased hematotoxicity without improvement in efficacy in comparison to standard CHOEP-14: 9-year follow up results of the CIVEP trial of the DSHNHL.

Authors:  Karin Hohloch; Carsten Zwick; Marita Ziepert; Dirk Hasenclever; Ulrich Kaiser; Andreas Engert; Heinz-Gert Höffkes; Frank Kroschinsky; Rolf Mesters; Andreas C Feller; Markus Löffler; Lorenz Trümper; Michael Pfreundschuh
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2014-01-03

9.  Pharmacokinetic and -dynamic modelling of G-CSF derivatives in humans.

Authors:  Markus Scholz; Sibylle Schirm; Marcus Wetzler; Christoph Engel; Markus Loeffler
Journal:  Theor Biol Med Model       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 2.432

10.  A randomized, non-inferiority study comparing efficacy and safety of a single dose of pegfilgrastim versus daily filgrastim in pediatric patients after autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplant.

Authors:  Simone Cesaro; Francesca Nesi; Gloria Tridello; Massimo Abate; Irene Sara Panizzolo; Rita Balter; Elisabetta Calore
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.