| Literature DB >> 29854086 |
Michael R Yeaman1,2,3,4, Sabrina Büttner5,6, Karin Thevissen7.
Abstract
The rise of microbial pathogens refractory to conventional antibiotics represents one of the most urgent and global public health concerns for the 21st century. Emergence of Candida auris isolates and the persistence of invasive mold infections that resist existing treatment and cause severe illness has underscored the threat of drug-resistant fungal infections. To meet these growing challenges, mechanistically novel agents and strategies are needed that surpass the conventional fungistatic or fungicidal drug actions. Host defense peptides have long been misunderstood as indiscriminant membrane detergents. However, evidence gathered over the past decade clearly points to their sophisticated and selective mechanisms of action, including exploiting regulated cell death pathways of their target pathogens. Such peptides perturb transmembrane potential and mitochondrial energetics, inducing phosphatidylserine accessibility and metacaspase activation in fungi. These mechanisms are often multimodal, affording target pathogens fewer resistance options as compared to traditional small molecule drugs. Here, recent advances in the field are examined regarding regulated cell death subroutines as potential therapeutic targets for innovative anti-infective peptides against pathogenic fungi. Furthering knowledge of protective host defense peptide interactions with target pathogens is key to advancing and applying novel prophylactic and therapeutic countermeasures to fungal resistance and pathogenesis.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29854086 PMCID: PMC5944218 DOI: 10.1155/2018/5473817
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oxid Med Cell Longev ISSN: 1942-0994 Impact factor: 6.543
Figure 1Model of host defense peptide mechanisms versus C. albicans. (1) Host cells activated by C. albicans deploy prestored and upregulate nuclear- (N-) encoded host defense peptides that directly interact with C. albicans to (2) target electronegative cell wall components (e.g., glycosylceramide or all specific cell proteins); (3) permeabilization of the cytoplasmic membrane during or following entry into the cytoplasm; (4) target the electronegative phospholipid composition and transnegative potential (Δψ) of mitochondria (Mito); (5) perturb mitochondrial functions essential to cell cycle and trafficking, as well as de-energization and respiratory decoupling activation of caspase and/or metacaspase pathway responses; (6) combined effects of cell envelope damage and mitochondrial dysfunction invokes the regulated cell death response which corresponds to hallmark features of apoptosis, including phosphatidylserine (PS) expression. This integrated model is supported by recent publications [115, 125, 131]. It should be understood that different antifungal peptides may exert different mechanisms or a different mechanistic sequence. For example, in the case of plant defensins, the sequence of membrane perturbation and ceramide accumulation has not yet been resolved. It could well be that ceramide accumulation is a first consequence of interaction with glucosylceramides (e.g., step 2; as with RsAFP2). Alternatively, membrane perturbation could potentially be a consequence of the induction of RCD and hence, only appears at step 6.
Main classes of host defense peptides (HDPs) shown to induce RCD.
| Main classes of RCD-inducing antifungal peptides∗ | ||
|---|---|---|
| Name | Source | Mode of action apart from RCD induction and mitochondrial dysfunction |
| A. Helical and extended peptides | ||
| Periplanetasin-2 | Cockroach ( | Lipid peroxidation, caspase activation |
| Scolopendin | Centipedes | Metacaspase activation |
| Lactoferrin | Bovine/human | Metacaspase activation, inhibition of membrane H+-ATPase Pma1 |
|
| ||
| B. | ||
| Plant defensin RsAFP2 | Radish ( | Interaction with fungal-specific glucosylceramide, induction of cell wall stress, ceramide accumulation, septin mislocalization, metacaspase independent |
| Plant defensin HsAFP1 | Coral bell ( | Interaction with PA and PI phospholipids, accumulation at buds and septa, internalization, pH dependent activity in vitro |
| Plant defensin-like peptide ApDef-1 |
| Cell cycle dysfunction, metacaspase activation |
| Insect defensin Coprisin | Dung beetle Family | Dysfunctional mitochondrial Δ |
| Fungal defensin-like peptide NFAP |
| Cell wall dysfunction, accumulation of nuclei at broken hyphal tips |
| Fungal defensin-like peptide AFP |
| Cell wall perturbation |
| Neutrophil defensin hNP-1 | Human | Membrane permeabilization and depolarization |
| Beta defensin h | Human | RCD modulated by Bcr1 and Ssd1 proteins in |
| Kinocidins (e.g., CXCL4, CXCL8) | Mammalian | Perturb membrane energetics and inhibit macromolecular synthesis; pH-related activity in vitro; RCD modulated by Bcr1 and Ssd1 proteins in |
∗Note that Histatin-5 and plant defensin-like peptide LpDef1 were not integrated in the table as their potential induction of RCD is still under investigation.
Figure 2Trajectory of antifungal peptide publications 1980–2017. [Clarivate Analytics accessed Nov 2017].