| Literature DB >> 29853773 |
Ahmed M Abu El-Asrar1,2, Ghulam Mohammad1, Eef Allegaert3, Ajmal Ahmad1, Mohammad Mairaj Siddiquei1, Kaiser Alam1, Priscilla W Gikandi1, Gert De Hertogh3, Ghislain Opdenakker4.
Abstract
Purpose: Matrix metalloproteinase-14 (MMP-14) is a transmembrane MMP that plays a critical role in promoting angiogenesis. We investigated the expression levels of MMP-14 and correlated the levels with clinical disease activity and with the levels of the angiogenic factors vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and MMP-9 in proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). To reinforce the findings at the functional level, we examined the expression of MMP-14 in the retinas of diabetic rats.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29853773 PMCID: PMC5957543
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Vis ISSN: 1090-0535 Impact factor: 2.367
Comparisons of mean matrix metalloproteinase-14 (MMP-14), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and MMP-9 levels in proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) and nondiabetic patients with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RD).
| Disease Group | MMP-14 (ng/ml) | VEGF (pg/ml) | MMP-9 (pg/ml) |
|---|---|---|---|
| PDR (n=34) | 5.5±1.4 | 675.1±521.7 | 654.8±376 |
| RD (n=18) | 2.5±2.5 | 26.9±44.8 | 98.2±112.4 |
| P value (Mann–Whitney test) | <0.001* | <0.001* | <0.001* |
*Statistically significant at 5% level of significance.
Figure 1The expression of matrix metalloproteinase-14 (MMP-14) in equal volumes (15 µl) of vitreous fluid samples obtained from patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) and from control patients with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RD) was determined with western blot analysis.
Figure 2Proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) fibrovascular epiretinal membranes. A: Negative control slide showing no labeling. Immunohistochemical staining for CD31 showing pathologic new blood vessels expressing this endothelial cell marker in (B) a membrane from a patient with active PDR and in (C) a membrane from a patient with inactive PDR. D: Immunohistochemical staining for CD45 showing numerous leukocytes in the stroma. E: Immunohistochemical staining for α-smooth muscle actin showing immunoreactivity in myofibroblasts (scale bar, 10 µm).
Figure 3Proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) fibrovascular epiretinal membranes. Immunohistochemical staining for matrix metalloproteinase-14 (MMP-14) showing immunoreactivity in the vascular endothelial cells (arrows), in intravascular leukocytes, in stromal cells, and in stromal spindle-shaped cells (arrowheads) in a membrane from a patient with active PDR (A, B, C) and in a membrane from a patient with inactive PDR (D). Notice that the membrane from the patient with inactive PDR is composed mostly of fibrous tissue. Double immunohistochemistry for CD45 (brown) and MMP-14 (red) in a membrane from a patient with active PDR demonstrated stromal cells coexpressing CD45 and MMP-14 (arrows; E). No counterstain to visualize the cell nuclei was applied (scale bar, 10 µm).
Figure 4Proliferative vitreoretinopathy fibrocellular epiretinal membranes. A: Negative control slide showing no labeling. B: Immunohistochemical staining for α-smooth muscle actin showing immunoreactivity in spindle-shaped myofibroblasts. C: Immunoreactivity staining for CD45 showing immunoreactivity in leukocytes. D: Immunohistochemical staining for matrix metalloproteinase-14 (MMP-14) showing immunohistochemistry in spindle-shaped myofibroblasts. E: Double immunohistochemistry for CD45 (brown) and MMP-14 (red) demonstrates cells coexpressing CD45 and MMP-14 (arrows; scale bar, 10 µm).
Figure 5Matrix metalloproteinase-14 (MMP-14) expression in diabetic rat retinas. A: MMP-14 expression was determined by western blot analysis on lysates of diabetic (D) and nondiabetic control (C) rats. After determination of the intensity of the MMP-14 protein band, intensities were adjusted to those of β-actin in each sample. Each measurement was performed at least three times. B: In addition, cell extracts were used to quantify the mRNA of MMP-14 by quantitative-RT-PCR. Results are expressed as mean ± standard deviation of 7-10 rats in each group. *The difference between the two means was statistically significant at 5% level of significance.