| Literature DB >> 32770964 |
Rensiqin Wu1, Zhifeng Zhu1, Dandan Zhou2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: It's necessary to analyze the role of VEGF, apelin, and HO-1 in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM), and to evaluate its relevance to diabetic retinopathy (DR).Entities:
Keywords: Apelin; Diabetic retinopathy; HO-1; Risks; VEGF
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32770964 PMCID: PMC7414684 DOI: 10.1186/s12886-020-01593-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Ophthalmol ISSN: 1471-2415 Impact factor: 2.209
The characteristics of included participants
| Groups | Cases | Male/female | Age(y) | Time course of DM(y) | BMI (kg/m2) | Hypertension (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 80 | 45/35 | 57.9 ± 3.95 | – | 22.5 ± 3.04 | 22 (27.5%) |
| NDR | 75 | 41/34 | 57.4 ± 2.57 | 2.3 ± 0.82 | 22.2 ± 2.99 | 26 (34.67%) |
| NPDR | 72 | 38/34 | 56.9 ± 3.88 | 4.3 ± 1.05 | 22.5 ± 3.13 | 26 (36.1%) |
| PDR | 68 | 37/29 | 57.4 ± 3.36 | 7.2 ± 2.44 | 22.4 ± 3.07 | 24 (35.29%) |
| χ2/F | 0.883 | 10.095 | 1.371 | 0.538 | 1.366 | |
| p | 0.114 | 0.098 | 0.021 | 0.185 | 0.052 |
The HDL-c, LDL-c, TG, TC, FPG, HbAlc level among groups
| Groups | Cases | HDL-c (mmol/L) | HDL-c (mmol/L) | TG (mmol/L) | TC (mmol/L) | FPG (mmol/L) | HbAlc(%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 80 | 2.37 ± 0.22 | 2.57 ± 0.32 | 1.58 ± 0.21 | 4.31 ± 0.61 | 5.29 ± 0.97 | 5.11 ± 0.68 |
| NDR | 75 | 2.36 ± 0.30 | 2.49 ± 0.35 | 1.59 ± 0.28 | 4.66 ± 0.68 | 6.02 ± 1.33* | 8.95 ± 1.80* |
| NPDR | 72 | 2.29 ± 0.36 | 2.50 ± 0.41 | 1.72 ± 0.31 | 5.03 ± 0.84 | 9.15 ± 2.16*# | 9.84 ± 2.15*# |
| PDR | 68 | 2.30 ± 0.38 | 2.44 ± 0.35 | 1.74 ± 0.28 | 5.79 ± 0.78 | 11.80 ± 3.19*#& | 10.17 ± 3.32*#& |
| F | 1.395 | 0.988 | 0.852 | 1.096 | 10.468 | 9.395 | |
| p | 0.275 | 0.107 | 0.097 | 0.145 | 0.037 | 0.011 |
Notes: *p < 0.05 compared with Control; #p < 0.05 compared with NDR; &p < 0.05 compared with Control
The VEGF, apelin and HO-1 level among groups
| Groups | Cases | VEGF (pg/ml) | Apelin (ng/ml) | HO-1(mmol/L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 80 | 57.03 ± 9.49 | 2.09 ± 0.82 | 50.38 ± 9.15 |
| NDR | 75 | 89.15 ± 10.44* | 4.22 ± 1.04* | 41.06 ± 8.52* |
| NPDR | 72 | 153.25 ± 20.58*# | 6.58 ± 1.86*# | 33.79 ± 6.15*# |
| PDR | 68 | 186.50 ± 30.16*# | 9.16 ± 2.33*# | 25.19 ± 5.27*# |
| F | 28.573 | 20.805 | 16.187 | |
| p | 0.001 | 0.003 | 0.017 |
Notes: *p < 0.05 compared with Control; #p < 0.05 compared with NDR; &p < 0.05 compared with Control
Fig. 1The ROC curve of VEGF, apelin, HO-1 for predicating PDR
The analysis on the diagnosis value of VEGF, apelin, HO-1 for PDR
| Items | Cutoff | AUC | 95%CI | p | Sensitivity(%) | Specificity(%) | Positive predictive value(%) | Negative predictive value(%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VEGF | 163.85 | 0.806 | 0.779–0.861 | 0.021 | 76.43 | 85.19 | 88.42 | 71.90 |
| Apelin | 8.27 | 0.819 | 0.765–0.878 | 0.016 | 84.08 | 82.95 | 85.68 | 80.62 |
| HO-1 | 26.06 | 0.798 | 0.733–0.829 | 0.009 | 73.99 | 81.42 | 78.15 | 78.07 |
| Combined use | – | 0.885 | 0.812–0.918 | 0.007 | 90.35 | 83.18 | 86.69 | 85.23 |
Correlation analysis on the risk factors related to PDR
| Variables | VEGF | Apelin | HO-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| r | p | r | p | r | p | |
| Age | 0.215 | 0.180 | 0.257 | 0.097 | −0.148 | 0.103 |
| Gender | 0.115 | 0.097 | 0.150 | 0.104 | −0.121 | 0.079 |
| Time course of DM | 0.389 | 0.042 | 0.275 | 0.033 | 0.206 | 0.044 |
| BMI | 0.167 | 0.079 | 0.201 | 0.059 | 0.085 | 0.102 |
| Hypertension | 0.294 | 0.157 | 0.175 | 0.202 | 0.213 | 0.119 |
| HDL-c | −0.168 | 0.096 | −0.074 | 0.138 | 0.128 | 0.085 |
| LDL-c | 0.156 | 0.104 | 0.183 | 0.099 | −0.226 | 0.142 |
| TG | 0.115 | 0.095 | 0.245 | 0.206 | −0.117 | 0.195 |
| TC | 0.099 | 0.183 | 0.105 | 0.126 | −0.136 | 0.092 |
| FPG | 0.468 | 0.018 | 0.381 | 0.009 | −0.403 | 0.017 |
| HbAlc | 0.395 | 0.037 | 0.214 | 0.015 | −0.378 | 0.035 |
| VEGF | – | – | 0.787 | 0.011 | −6.165 | 0.017 |
| Apelin | 0.787 | 0.011 | – | – | −5.090 | 0.009 |