Literature DB >> 29851653

Fully automated tissue classifier for contrast-enhanced CT scans of adult and pediatric patients.

Elanchezhian Somasundaram1, Joanna Deaton, Robert Kaufman, Samuel Brady.   

Abstract

To develop a consistent, fully-automated classifier for all tissues within the trunk and to more accurately discriminate between tissues (such as bone) and contrast medium with overlapping high CT numbers. Twenty-eight contrast enhanced NCAP (neck-chest-abdomen-pelvis) CT scans (four adult and three pediatric patients) were used to train and test a tissue classification pipeline. The classifier output consisted of six tissue classes: lung, fat, muscle, solid organ, blood/bowel contrast and bone. The input features for training were selected from 28 2D image filters and 12 3D filters, and one hand crafted spatial feature. To improve differentiation between tissue and blood/bowel contrast classification, 70 additional CT images were manually classified. Two different training data sets consisting of manually classified tissues from different locations in body were used to train the models. Training used the random forest algorithm in WEKA (Waikato Environment for Knowledge Analysis); the number of trees was optimized for best out-of-bag error. Automated classification accuracy was compared with manual classification by calculating dice similarity coefficient (DSC). Model performance was tested on 21 manually classified slices (two adult and one pediatric patient). The overall DSC at image locations represented in the training dataset were-lung: 0.98, fat: 0.90, muscle: 0.85, solid organ: 0.75, blood/contrast: 0.82, and bone: 0.90. The overall DSC for slice locations that were not represented in the training dataset were-lung: 0.97, fat: 0.89, muscle: 0.76, solid organ: 0.79, blood: 0.56, and bone: 0.74. Analyzing the classification maps for the entire scan volume revealed that except for misclassifications in the trabecular bone region of the spinal column, and solid organ and blood/contrast interfaces within the abdomen, the results were acceptable. A fully-automated whole-body tissue classifier for adult and pediatric contrast-enhanced CT using random forest algorithm and intensity-based image filters was developed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29851653      PMCID: PMC6183055          DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aac944

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  7 in total

Review 1.  Current methods in medical image segmentation.

Authors:  D L Pham; C Xu; J L Prince
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 9.590

2.  Entangled decision forests and their application for semantic segmentation of CT images.

Authors:  Albert Montillo; Jamie Shotton; John Winn; Juan Eugenio Iglesias; Dimitri Metaxas; Antonio Criminisi
Journal:  Inf Process Med Imaging       Date:  2011

3.  Combining generative and discriminative models for semantic segmentation of CT scans via active learning.

Authors:  Juan Eugenio Iglesias; Ender Konukoglu; Albert Montillo; Zhuowen Tu; Antonio Criminisi
Journal:  Inf Process Med Imaging       Date:  2011

4.  Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis.

Authors:  Johannes Schindelin; Ignacio Arganda-Carreras; Erwin Frise; Verena Kaynig; Mark Longair; Tobias Pietzsch; Stephan Preibisch; Curtis Rueden; Stephan Saalfeld; Benjamin Schmid; Jean-Yves Tinevez; Daniel James White; Volker Hartenstein; Kevin Eliceiri; Pavel Tomancak; Albert Cardona
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 28.547

5.  Tissue segmentation of computed tomography images using a Random Forest algorithm: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Daniel F Polan; Samuel L Brady; Robert A Kaufman
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Automated medical image segmentation techniques.

Authors:  Neeraj Sharma; Lalit M Aggarwal
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2010-01

7.  Trainable Weka Segmentation: a machine learning tool for microscopy pixel classification.

Authors:  Ignacio Arganda-Carreras; Verena Kaynig; Curtis Rueden; Kevin W Eliceiri; Johannes Schindelin; Albert Cardona; H Sebastian Seung
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 6.937

  7 in total
  3 in total

1.  Machine Learning for Automatic Paraspinous Muscle Area and Attenuation Measures on Low-Dose Chest CT Scans.

Authors:  Ryan Barnard; Josh Tan; Brandon Roller; Caroline Chiles; Ashley A Weaver; Robert D Boutin; Stephen B Kritchevsky; Leon Lenchik
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 3.173

2.  Automated Segmentation of Abdominal Skeletal Muscle on Pediatric CT Scans Using Deep Learning.

Authors:  James Castiglione; Elanchezhian Somasundaram; Leah A Gilligan; Andrew T Trout; Samuel Brady
Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell       Date:  2021-01-06

3.  Trainable WEKA (Waikato Environment for Knowledge Analysis) Segmentation Tool: Machine-Learning-Enabled Segmentation on Features of Panoramic Radiographs.

Authors:  Nitin Kanuri; Ahmed Z Abdelkarim; Sonali A Rathore
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-01-31
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.