Ryan Barnard1, Josh Tan2, Brandon Roller2, Caroline Chiles2, Ashley A Weaver3, Robert D Boutin4, Stephen B Kritchevsky5, Leon Lenchik6. 1. Department of Biostatistical Sciences, Division of Public Health Sciences, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina. 2. Department of Radiology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Medical Center Blvd, Winston-Salem, NC 27157. 3. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina. 4. Department of Radiology, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, California. 5. Department of Internal Medicine, Section on Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina. 6. Department of Radiology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Medical Center Blvd, Winston-Salem, NC 27157. Electronic address: llenchik@wakehealth.edu.
Abstract
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To develop and evaluate an automated machine learning (ML) algorithm for segmenting the paraspinous muscles on chest computed tomography (CT) scans to evaluate for presence of sarcopenia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A convolutional neural network based on the U-Net architecture was trained to perform muscle segmentation on a dataset of 1875 single slice CT images and was tested on 209 CT images of participants in the National Lung Screening Trial. Low-dose, noncontrast CT examinations were obtained at 33 clinical sites, using scanners from four manufacturers. The study participants had a mean age of 71.6 years (range, 70-74 years). Ground truth was obtained by manually segmenting the left paraspinous muscle at the level of the T12 vertebra. Muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) and muscle attenuation (MA) were recorded. Comparison between the ML algorithm and ground truth measures of muscle CSA and MA were obtained using Dice similarity coefficients and Pearson correlations. RESULTS: Compared to ground truth segmentation, the ML algorithm achieved median (standard deviation) Dice scores of 0.94 (0.04) in the test set. Mean (SD) muscle CSA was 14.3 (3.6) cm2 for ground truth and 13.7 (3.5) cm2 for ML segmentation. Mean (SD) MA was 41.6 (7.6) Hounsfield units (HU) for ground truth and 43.5 (7.9) HU for ML segmentation. There was high correlation between ML algorithm and ground truth for muscle CSA (r2 = 0.86; p < 0.0001) and MA (r2 = 0.95; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The ML algorithm for measurement of paraspinous muscles compared favorably to manual ground truth measurements in the NLST. The algorithm generalized well to a heterogeneous set of low-dose CT images and may be capable of automated quantification of muscle metrics to screen for sarcopenia on routine chest CT examinations.
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To develop and evaluate an automated machine learning (ML) algorithm for segmenting the paraspinous muscles on chest computed tomography (CT) scans to evaluate for presence of sarcopenia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A convolutional neural network based on the U-Net architecture was trained to perform muscle segmentation on a dataset of 1875 single slice CT images and was tested on 209 CT images of participants in the National Lung Screening Trial. Low-dose, noncontrast CT examinations were obtained at 33 clinical sites, using scanners from four manufacturers. The study participants had a mean age of 71.6 years (range, 70-74 years). Ground truth was obtained by manually segmenting the left paraspinous muscle at the level of the T12 vertebra. Muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) and muscle attenuation (MA) were recorded. Comparison between the ML algorithm and ground truth measures of muscle CSA and MA were obtained using Dice similarity coefficients and Pearson correlations. RESULTS: Compared to ground truth segmentation, the ML algorithm achieved median (standard deviation) Dice scores of 0.94 (0.04) in the test set. Mean (SD) muscle CSA was 14.3 (3.6) cm2 for ground truth and 13.7 (3.5) cm2 for ML segmentation. Mean (SD) MA was 41.6 (7.6) Hounsfield units (HU) for ground truth and 43.5 (7.9) HU for ML segmentation. There was high correlation between ML algorithm and ground truth for muscle CSA (r2 = 0.86; p < 0.0001) and MA (r2 = 0.95; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The ML algorithm for measurement of paraspinous muscles compared favorably to manual ground truth measurements in the NLST. The algorithm generalized well to a heterogeneous set of low-dose CT images and may be capable of automated quantification of muscle metrics to screen for sarcopenia on routine chest CT examinations.
Authors: Robert D Boutin; Sara Bamrungchart; Cyrus P Bateni; Daniel P Beavers; Kristen M Beavers; John P Meehan; Leon Lenchik Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2017-03-07 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: E Dent; J E Morley; A J Cruz-Jentoft; H Arai; S B Kritchevsky; J Guralnik; J M Bauer; M Pahor; B C Clark; M Cesari; J Ruiz; C C Sieber; M Aubertin-Leheudre; D L Waters; R Visvanathan; F Landi; D T Villareal; R Fielding; C W Won; O Theou; F C Martin; B Dong; J Woo; L Flicker; L Ferrucci; R A Merchant; L Cao; T Cederholm; S M L Ribeiro; L Rodríguez-Mañas; S D Anker; J Lundy; L M Gutiérrez Robledo; I Bautmans; I Aprahamian; J M G A Schols; M Izquierdo; B Vellas Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2018 Impact factor: 4.075
Authors: Amanika Kumar; Michael R Moynagh; Francesco Multinu; William A Cliby; Michaela E McGree; Amy L Weaver; Phillip M Young; Jamie N Bakkum-Gamez; Carrie L Langstraat; Sean C Dowdy; Aminah Jatoi; Andrea Mariani Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2016-06-02 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Denise R Aberle; Amanda M Adams; Christine D Berg; William C Black; Jonathan D Clapp; Richard M Fagerstrom; Ilana F Gareen; Constantine Gatsonis; Pamela M Marcus; JoRean D Sicks Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-06-29 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Steven L Bokshan; Alex L Han; J Mason DePasse; Adam E M Eltorai; Stephen E Marcaccio; Mark A Palumbo; Alan H Daniels Journal: Orthopedics Date: 2016-08-18 Impact factor: 1.390
Authors: Leon Lenchik; Laura Heacock; Ashley A Weaver; Robert D Boutin; Tessa S Cook; Jason Itri; Christopher G Filippi; Rao P Gullapalli; James Lee; Marianna Zagurovskaya; Tara Retson; Kendra Godwin; Joey Nicholson; Ponnada A Narayana Journal: Acad Radiol Date: 2019-08-10 Impact factor: 3.173
Authors: Leon Lenchik; Ryan Barnard; Robert D Boutin; Stephen B Kritchevsky; Haiying Chen; Josh Tan; Peggy M Cawthon; Ashley A Weaver; Fang-Chi Hsu Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2021-01-18 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Ka'Toria Edwards; Avneesh Chhabra; James Dormer; Phillip Jones; Robert D Boutin; Leon Lenchik; Baowei Fei Journal: Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng Date: 2020-02-28
Authors: Eileen N Phan; Steven W Thorpe; Felix S Wong; Augustine M Saiz; Sandra L Taylor; Robert J Canter; Leon Lenchik; R Lor Randall; Robert D Boutin Journal: J Surg Oncol Date: 2020-07-01 Impact factor: 3.454
Authors: Yasasvi Tadavarthi; Valeria Makeeva; William Wagstaff; Henry Zhan; Anna Podlasek; Neil Bhatia; Marta Heilbrun; Elizabeth Krupinski; Nabile Safdar; Imon Banerjee; Judy Gichoya; Hari Trivedi Journal: Radiol Artif Intell Date: 2022-02-02
Authors: Fausto Salaffi; Marina Carotti; Andrea Di Matteo; Luca Ceccarelli; Sonia Farah; Catalina Villota-Eraso; Marco Di Carlo; Andrea Giovagnoni Journal: Radiol Med Date: 2022-09-20 Impact factor: 6.313
Authors: Wilfred Manzano; Leon Lenchik; Akshay S Chaudhari; Lawrence Yao; Sarthak Gupta; Robert D Boutin Journal: Skeletal Radiol Date: 2021-07-16 Impact factor: 2.199