Pablo Valderrabano1, Melissa J McGettigan2, Cesar A Lam2, Laila Khazai3, Zachary J Thompson4, Christine H Chung1, Barbara A Centeno3, Bryan McIver1. 1. 1 Department of Head and Neck-Endocrine Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute , Tampa, Florida. 2. 2 Department of Diagnostic Imaging, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute , Tampa, Florida. 3. 3 Department of Anatomic Pathology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute , Tampa, Florida. 4. 4 Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute , Tampa, Florida.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The 2015 American Thyroid Association (ATA) guidelines recommend using a classification based on sonographic patterns to set the size threshold for biopsies. Each pattern is associated with a distinct estimated rate of malignancy that it was hypothesized should stratify the risk of malignancy of cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules (ITNs). METHODS: Ultrasound images of 463 ITNs (38% atypia/follicular lesions of undetermined significance; 62% follicular neoplasms) with histological follow-up consecutively evaluated between October 2008 and June 2015 at the authors' academic cancer center were independently evaluated by three observers and classified into one of the five sonographic patterns proposed by the ATA. Nodules with sonographic patterns not defined in the classification were grouped into a non-ATA pattern category. Differences in clinical and histological findings between the sonographic patterns were assessed. The prevalence of malignancy and odds ratio for malignancy were calculated for each sonographic pattern (low and intermediate patterns were collapsed for the analysis). RESULTS: The distribution of size and cytological diagnosis was significantly different between sonographic patterns (p < 0.001). The overall rate of malignancy was 27%. The rate of malignancy for the very low, low/intermediate, high, and non-ATA patterns were 0%, 19%, 56%, and 36%, respectively, and were all significantly different. Compared to the low/intermediate suspicion patterns, the odds ratios for malignancy were 2.35 for the non-ATA and 5.18 for the high suspicion patterns (p < 0.001). The odds ratio of the non-ATA pattern was 0.45 over the high suspicion pattern (p = 0.04). Results were similar in both cytological categories and for each observer separately. Sonographic patterns were associated with distinct histopathological profiles (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: ATA sonographic patterns are associated with distinct clinical features and pathological outcomes, and effectively stratify the cancer risk in ITNs. Thus, the ATA sonographic patterns should be used not only to set the size threshold for biopsy, but also to personalize management after the biopsy.
BACKGROUND: The 2015 American Thyroid Association (ATA) guidelines recommend using a classification based on sonographic patterns to set the size threshold for biopsies. Each pattern is associated with a distinct estimated rate of malignancy that it was hypothesized should stratify the risk of malignancy of cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules (ITNs). METHODS: Ultrasound images of 463 ITNs (38% atypia/follicular lesions of undetermined significance; 62% follicular neoplasms) with histological follow-up consecutively evaluated between October 2008 and June 2015 at the authors' academic cancer center were independently evaluated by three observers and classified into one of the five sonographic patterns proposed by the ATA. Nodules with sonographic patterns not defined in the classification were grouped into a non-ATA pattern category. Differences in clinical and histological findings between the sonographic patterns were assessed. The prevalence of malignancy and odds ratio for malignancy were calculated for each sonographic pattern (low and intermediate patterns were collapsed for the analysis). RESULTS: The distribution of size and cytological diagnosis was significantly different between sonographic patterns (p < 0.001). The overall rate of malignancy was 27%. The rate of malignancy for the very low, low/intermediate, high, and non-ATA patterns were 0%, 19%, 56%, and 36%, respectively, and were all significantly different. Compared to the low/intermediate suspicion patterns, the odds ratios for malignancy were 2.35 for the non-ATA and 5.18 for the high suspicion patterns (p < 0.001). The odds ratio of the non-ATA pattern was 0.45 over the high suspicion pattern (p = 0.04). Results were similar in both cytological categories and for each observer separately. Sonographic patterns were associated with distinct histopathological profiles (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: ATA sonographic patterns are associated with distinct clinical features and pathological outcomes, and effectively stratify the cancer risk in ITNs. Thus, the ATA sonographic patterns should be used not only to set the size threshold for biopsy, but also to personalize management after the biopsy.
Entities:
Keywords:
noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features (NIFTP); thyroid cancer; thyroid cytology; thyroid nodules; thyroid ultrasound
Authors: Pablo Valderrabano; Laila Khazai; Zachary J Thompson; Marino E Leon; Kristen J Otto; Julie E Hallanger-Johnson; J Trad Wadsworth; Christine H Chung; Barbara A Centeno; Bryan McIver Journal: Head Neck Date: 2018-04-06 Impact factor: 3.147
Authors: Yuri E Nikiforov; Raja R Seethala; Giovanni Tallini; Zubair W Baloch; Fulvio Basolo; Lester D R Thompson; Justine A Barletta; Bruce M Wenig; Abir Al Ghuzlan; Kennichi Kakudo; Thomas J Giordano; Venancio A Alves; Elham Khanafshar; Sylvia L Asa; Adel K El-Naggar; William E Gooding; Steven P Hodak; Ricardo V Lloyd; Guy Maytal; Ozgur Mete; Marina N Nikiforova; Vania Nosé; Mauro Papotti; David N Poller; Peter M Sadow; Arthur S Tischler; R Michael Tuttle; Kathryn B Wall; Virginia A LiVolsi; Gregory W Randolph; Ronald A Ghossein Journal: JAMA Oncol Date: 2016-08-01 Impact factor: 31.777
Authors: Pablo Valderrabano; Marino E Leon; Barbara A Centeno; Kristen J Otto; Laila Khazai; Judith C McCaffrey; Jeffery S Russell; Bryan McIver Journal: Eur J Endocrinol Date: 2016-02-22 Impact factor: 6.664
Authors: Bryan R Haugen; Erik K Alexander; Keith C Bible; Gerard M Doherty; Susan J Mandel; Yuri E Nikiforov; Furio Pacini; Gregory W Randolph; Anna M Sawka; Martin Schlumberger; Kathryn G Schuff; Steven I Sherman; Julie Ann Sosa; David L Steward; R Michael Tuttle; Leonard Wartofsky Journal: Thyroid Date: 2016-01 Impact factor: 6.568
Authors: Snehal G Patel; Sally E Carty; Kelly L McCoy; N Paul Ohori; Shane O LeBeau; Raja R Seethala; Marina N Nikiforova; Yuri E Nikiforov; Linwah Yip Journal: Surgery Date: 2016-11-15 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: Cesar A Lam; Melissa J McGettigan; Zachary J Thompson; Laila Khazai; Christine H Chung; Barbara A Centeno; Bryan McIver; Pablo Valderrabano Journal: Endocrine Date: 2019-07-12 Impact factor: 3.633
Authors: Theodora Pappa; Sara Ahmadi; Athanasios Bikas; Sally Hwang; Alexandra Coleman; Isabel Lobon; Pingping Xiang; Matthew Kim; Ellen Marqusee; Danielle M Richman; Sara M Durfee; Elizabeth H Asch; Carol B Benson; Mary C Frates; Iñigo Landa; Erik K Alexander Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2022-06-16 Impact factor: 6.134
Authors: Juan C Hernandez-Prera; Pablo Valderrabano; Jordan H Creed; Janis V de la Iglesia; Robbert J C Slebos; Barbara A Centeno; Valentina Tarasova; Julie Hallanger-Johnson; Colleen Veloski; Kristen J Otto; Bruce M Wenig; Sean J Yoder; Cesar A Lam; Derek S Park; Alexander R Anderson; Natarajan Raghunand; Anders Berglund; Jimmy Caudell; Travis A Gerke; Christine H Chung Journal: Thyroid Date: 2020-08-25 Impact factor: 6.568
Authors: Syed Z Ali; Allan Siperstein; Peter M Sadow; Allan C Golding; Giulia C Kennedy; Richard T Kloos; Paul W Ladenson Journal: Cancer Cytopathol Date: 2019-04-24 Impact factor: 4.264
Authors: James J Figge; William E Gooding; David L Steward; Linwah Yip; Rebecca S Sippel; Samantha Peiling Yang; Randall P Scheri; Jennifer A Sipos; Susan J Mandel; Sarah E Mayson; Kenneth D Burman; Jessica M Folek; Bryan R Haugen; Julie A Sosa; Rajeev Parameswaran; Wee Boon Tan; Yuri E Nikiforov; Sally E Carty Journal: Thyroid Date: 2021-09-01 Impact factor: 6.568