Literature DB >> 26903551

Institutional prevalence of malignancy of indeterminate thyroid cytology is necessary but insufficient to accurately interpret molecular marker tests.

Pablo Valderrabano1, Marino E Leon2, Barbara A Centeno2, Kristen J Otto1, Laila Khazai2, Judith C McCaffrey1, Jeffery S Russell1, Bryan McIver3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Several molecular marker tests are available to refine the diagnosis of thyroid nodules. Knowing the true prevalence of malignancy (PoM) within each cytological category is considered necessary to select the most appropriate test and to interpret results accurately. We describe our institutional PoM among cytological categories and report our experience with molecular markers.
DESIGN: Single-center retrospective study.
METHODS: We calculated the institutional PoM for each category of the Bethesda system (Bethesda) on all thyroid nodules with cytological evaluation from October 2008 to May 2014. We estimated the predictive values for Afirma, miRInform, and ThyroSeq v2, based on published sensitivity and specificity. Finally, we assessed our own experience with miRInform.
RESULTS: The PoMs for Bethesda III and IV categories were 21 and 28%, respectively. ThyroSeq v2 achieves the highest theoretical negative and positive predictive values (NPV and PPV) in Bethesda III (98 and 75%) and Bethesda IV categories (96 and 83%). At our institution, miRInform detected a mutation in 16% of 109 indeterminate nodules tested, all in Bethesda IV specimens. Histology was available in 56 (51%) nodules. The observed sensitivity and specificity in Bethesda IV specimens were 63 and 86%, yielding an NPV and a PPV of 75 and 77%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: For our current Bethesda III and IV PoM, the actual performance of miRInform was worse than expected. Theoretically ThyroSeq v2 should have the best performance, but it could be affected in the same way as miRInform, given the similarities between the tests. Assessing the institutional performance of each test is necessary along with PoM individualization.
© 2016 European Society of Endocrinology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26903551     DOI: 10.1530/EJE-15-1163

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Endocrinol        ISSN: 0804-4643            Impact factor:   6.664


  14 in total

Review 1.  Current methodologies for molecular screening of thyroid nodules.

Authors:  Elisabetta Macerola; Fulvio Basolo
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2018-08

2.  Thyroid Nodules with Indeterminate Cytology: Utility of the American Thyroid Association Sonographic Patterns for Cancer Risk Stratification.

Authors:  Pablo Valderrabano; Melissa J McGettigan; Cesar A Lam; Laila Khazai; Zachary J Thompson; Christine H Chung; Barbara A Centeno; Bryan McIver
Journal:  Thyroid       Date:  2018-07-17       Impact factor: 6.568

3.  Cancer Risk Stratification of Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules: A Cytological Approach.

Authors:  Pablo Valderrabano; Laila Khazai; Zachary J Thompson; Marino E Leon; Kristen J Otto; Julie E Hallanger-Johnson; J Trad Wadsworth; Bruce M Wenig; Christine H Chung; Barbara A Centeno; Bryan McIver
Journal:  Thyroid       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 6.568

4.  Molecular Testing Versus Diagnostic Lobectomy in Bethesda III/IV Thyroid Nodules: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.

Authors:  Kristina J Nicholson; Mark S Roberts; Kelly L McCoy; Sally E Carty; Linwah Yip
Journal:  Thyroid       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 6.568

5.  Association of Tumor Size With Histologic and Clinical Outcomes Among Patients With Cytologically Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules.

Authors:  Pablo Valderrabano; Laila Khazai; Zachary J Thompson; Kristen J Otto; Julie E Hallanger-Johnson; Christine H Chung; Barbara A Centeno; Bryan McIver
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 6.223

6.  Evaluation of ThyroSeq v2 performance in thyroid nodules with indeterminate cytology.

Authors:  Pablo Valderrabano; Laila Khazai; Marino E Leon; Zachary J Thompson; Zhenjun Ma; Christine H Chung; Julie E Hallanger-Johnson; Kristen J Otto; Kara D Rogers; Barbara A Centeno; Bryan McIver
Journal:  Endocr Relat Cancer       Date:  2017-01-19       Impact factor: 5.678

7.  The mutational analysis in the diagnostic work-up of thyroid nodules: the real impact in a center with large experience in thyroid cytopathology.

Authors:  E Macerola; T Rago; A Proietti; F Basolo; P Vitti
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2018-04-27       Impact factor: 4.256

8.  Cancer Risk Associated with Nuclear Atypia in Cytologically Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Pablo Valderrabano; Laila Khazai; Zachary J Thompson; Susan C Sharpe; Valentina D Tarasova; Kristen J Otto; Julie E Hallanger-Johnson; J Trad Wadsworth; Bruce M Wenig; Christine H Chung; Barbara A Centeno; Bryan McIver
Journal:  Thyroid       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 6.568

9.  Interinstitutional variation in predictive value of the ThyroSeq v2 genomic classifier for cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules.

Authors:  Andrea R Marcadis; Pablo Valderrabano; Allen S Ho; Justin Tepe; Christina E Swartzwelder; Serena Byrd; Wendy L Sacks; Brian R Untch; Ashok R Shaha; Bin Xu; Oscar Lin; Ronald A Ghossein; Richard J Wong; Jennifer L Marti; Luc G T Morris
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 3.982

10.  Thyroseq v3, Afirma GSC, and microRNA Panels Versus Previous Molecular Tests in the Preoperative Diagnosis of Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Cristina Alina Silaghi; Vera Lozovanu; Carmen Emanuela Georgescu; Raluca Diana Georgescu; Sergiu Susman; Bogdana Adriana Năsui; Anca Dobrean; Horatiu Silaghi
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 5.555

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.