Literature DB >> 32579152

Relationship between genetic knowledge and familial communication of CRC risk and intent to communicate CRCP genetic information: insights from FamilyTalk eMERGE III.

Sukh Makhnoon1, Deborah J Bowen2, Brian H Shirts3, Stephanie M Fullerton2, Hendrika W Meischke4, Eric B Larson5, James D Ralston6, Kathleen Leppig6, David R Crosslin7, David Veenstra8, Gail P Jarvik9.   

Abstract

Successful translation of genetic information into patient-centered care and improved outcomes depends, at least in part, on patients' genetic knowledge. Although genetic knowledge is believed to be an important facilitator of familial communication of genetic risk information, empirical evidence of this association is lacking. We examined whether genetic knowledge was related to frequency of current familial communication about colorectal cancer and polyp (CRCP) risk, and future intention to share CRCP-related genomic test results with family members in a clinical sample of patients. We recruited 189 patients eligible for clinical CRCP sequencing to the eMERGE III FamilyTalk randomized controlled trial and surveyed them about genetic knowledge and familial communication at baseline. Participants were primarily Caucasian, 47% male, average age of 68 years, mostly well educated, and with high-income levels. Genetic knowledge was positively associated with future-intended familial communication of genetic information (odds ratio = 1.11, 95% confidence interval: 1.02-1.23), but not associated with current communication of CRC risk (β = 0.01, p = .58). Greater current communication of CRC risk was associated with better family functioning (β = 0.04, p = 8.2e-5). Participants' genetic knowledge in this study was minimally associated with their intended familial communication of genetic information. Although participants have good intentions of communication, family-level factors may hinder actual follow through of these intentions. Continued focus on improving proband's genetic knowledge coupled with interventions to overcome family-level barriers to communication may be needed to improve familial communication rates. © Society of Behavioral Medicine 2020. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer; Communication intention; Familial communication; Genetic knowledge

Year:  2021        PMID: 32579152      PMCID: PMC7963296          DOI: 10.1093/tbm/ibaa054

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transl Behav Med        ISSN: 1613-9860            Impact factor:   3.046


  43 in total

1.  All in the family: evaluation of the process and content of sisters' communication about BRCA1 and BRCA2 genetic test results.

Authors:  Chanita Hughes; Caryn Lerman; Marc Schwartz; Beth N Peshkin; Lari Wenzel; Steven Narod; Camille Corio; Kenneth P Tercyak; Danielle Hanna; Claudine Isaacs; David Main
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  2002-01-15

Review 2.  What's wrong with Bonferroni adjustments.

Authors:  T V Perneger
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-04-18

Review 3.  Patient-reported outcomes in the Translational Breast Cancer Research Consortium.

Authors:  Deborah J Bowen; Eileen H Shinn; Sophie Gregrowski; Gretchen Kimmick; Laura S Dominici; Elizabeth S Frank; Karen Lisa Smith; Gabrielle Rocque; Kathryn J Ruddy; Teri Pollastro; Michelle Melisko; Tarah J Ballinger; Oluwadamilola M Fayanju; Antonio C Wolff
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Knowledge of genomic testing among early-stage breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Alice R Richman; Janice P Tzeng; Lisa A Carey; Valesca P Retèl; Noel T Brewer
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.894

5.  How families communicate about HNPCC genetic testing: findings from a qualitative study.

Authors:  Susan K Peterson; Beatty G Watts; Laura M Koehly; Sally W Vernon; Walter F Baile; Wendy K Kohlmann; Ellen R Gritz
Journal:  Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 3.908

6.  All in the family? Communication of cancer survivors with their families.

Authors:  Deborah J Bowen; Jennifer L Hay; Julie N Harris-Wai; Hendrika Meischke; Wylie Burke
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 2.375

7.  Characteristics of health information gatherers, disseminators, and blockers within families at risk of hereditary cancer: implications for family health communication interventions.

Authors:  Laura M Koehly; June A Peters; Regina Kenen; Lindsey M Hoskins; Anne L Ersig; Natalia R Kuhn; Jennifer T Loud; Mark H Greene
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2009-10-15       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Development and preliminary validation of the cancer family impact scale for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Pamela S Sinicrope; Sally W Vernon; Pamela M Diamond; Christi A Patten; Steven H Kelder; Kari G Rabe; Gloria M Petersen
Journal:  Genet Test       Date:  2008-03

Review 9.  The Electronic Medical Records and Genomics (eMERGE) Network: past, present, and future.

Authors:  Omri Gottesman; Helena Kuivaniemi; Gerard Tromp; W Andrew Faucett; Rongling Li; Teri A Manolio; Saskia C Sanderson; Joseph Kannry; Randi Zinberg; Melissa A Basford; Murray Brilliant; David J Carey; Rex L Chisholm; Christopher G Chute; John J Connolly; David Crosslin; Joshua C Denny; Carlos J Gallego; Jonathan L Haines; Hakon Hakonarson; John Harley; Gail P Jarvik; Isaac Kohane; Iftikhar J Kullo; Eric B Larson; Catherine McCarty; Marylyn D Ritchie; Dan M Roden; Maureen E Smith; Erwin P Böttinger; Marc S Williams
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 10.  The impact of communicating genetic risks of disease on risk-reducing health behaviour: systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Gareth J Hollands; David P French; Simon J Griffin; A Toby Prevost; Stephen Sutton; Sarah King; Theresa M Marteau
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2016-03-15
View more
  1 in total

1.  Do research participants share genomic screening results with family members?

Authors:  Julia Wynn; Hila Milo Rasouly; Tania Vasquez-Loarte; Akilan M Saami; Robyn Weiss; Sonja I Ziniel; Paul S Appelbaum; Ellen Wright Clayton; Kurt D Christensen; David Fasel; Robert C Green; Heather S Hain; Margaret Harr; Christin Hoell; Iftikhar J Kullo; Kathleen A Leppig; Melanie F Myers; Joel E Pacyna; Emma F Perez; Cynthia A Prows; Alanna Kulchak Rahm; Gemme Campbell-Salome; Richard R Sharp; Maureen E Smith; Georgia L Wiesner; Janet L Williams; Carrie L Blout Zawatsky; Ali G Gharavi; Wendy K Chung; Ingrid A Holm
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2021-10-19       Impact factor: 2.717

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.