Literature DB >> 29846606

Effects of silage additives and varieties on fermentation quality, aerobic stability, and nutritive value of oat silage.

Guiqin Q Zhao1, Zeliang L Ju1, Jikuan K Chai1, Ting Jiao1, Zhifeng F Jia2, David P Casper3, Liang Zeng1, Jian P Wu1.   

Abstract

Oat is a main feed crop in high- altitude areas of western China, but few studies have been done on its silage making. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of silage additives on fermentation, aerobic stability, and nutritive value of different oat varieties (OV) grown in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau of China. Two OV (Avena sativa L. cv. Longyan No.1 (OVL1) and Avena sativa L. cv. Longyan No.3 (OVL3)) were planted in a randomized complete block design, harvested at early dough stage with 32.6% and 34.1% DM, respectively. The fresh material was chopped to 2-cm length and treated with additives (0, Sila-Mix (MIX), Sila-Max (MAX) in a 2 × 3 factorial arrangement of treatments with three replicates. Both additives contained a mixture of lactic acid bacteria and supplied a final application rate of 2.5 × 108 of lactic acid bacteria per kg of fresh forage weight. After 60 d of ensiling, the number of lactic acid bacteria in treated silages was about 10-fold greater than the control and generally resulted in a lower pH and ammonia-nitrogen (P < 0.001), greater total acids and ratios of lactic acid/acetic acid (P < 0.001), and DM recovery (P = 0.028). Treatment with additives also decreased (P < 0.001) the number of yeasts, which resulted in marked (P < 0.001) improvements in aerobic stability with the effect being greatest with MAX. Both additives improved (P ≤ 0.036) the 48-h in situ DM digestion in OVL1, but not in OVL3 (P ≥ 0.052). Treatment with both additives also increased (P ≤ 0.003) NDF digestion in OVL1 while it was improved (P < 0.001) only by MAX in OVL3. In contrast, the additives did not affect (P ≥ 0.088) in situ hemicellulose digestion in OVL1, but it was improved (P = 0.048) by MIX and further improved (P = 0.002) by MAX in OVL3. Treatment with MAX improved yields of digestible DM and digestible NDF in both varieties. Dry matter recovery was not affected (P = 0.121) by variety. Compared to CTRL, silage treated with MAX had a greater (P = 0.015) DM recovery (96.7% vs. 93.9%). Inoculation improved (P < 0.001) aerobic stability. The MAX was the most effective for both varieties, while MIX was intermediate and was more effective in OVL3 than OVL1 silage. The results also showed that in Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, compared to OVL1, OVL3 resulted in greater (P ≤ 0.002) yields of digestible nutrients; specifically, treated with MAX improved silage fermentation efficiency, DM recovery, and provided excellent aerobic stability for feeding to ruminants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29846606      PMCID: PMC6095438          DOI: 10.1093/jas/sky207

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  14 in total

Review 1.  The detrimental effects of air on silage.

Authors:  M K Woolford
Journal:  J Appl Bacteriol       Date:  1990-02

2.  Automated simultaneous determination of ammonia and total amino acids in ruminal fluid and in vitro media.

Authors:  G A Broderick; J H Kang
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 4.034

3.  Effect of applying lactic acid bacteria isolated from forage crops on fermentation characteristics and aerobic deterioration of silage.

Authors:  Y Cai; Y Benno; M Ogawa; S Kumai
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.034

4.  The effect of Lactobacillus buchneri and other additives on the fermentation and aerobic stability of barley silage.

Authors:  L Kung; N K Ranjit
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.034

5.  Antifungal 3-hydroxy fatty acids from Lactobacillus plantarum MiLAB 14.

Authors:  Jörgen Sjögren; Jesper Magnusson; Anders Broberg; Johan Schnürer; Lennart Kenne
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Characteristics of lactic acid bacteria isolates and their inoculating effects on the silage fermentation at high temperature.

Authors:  M M Chen; Q H Liu; G R Xin; J G Zhang
Journal:  Lett Appl Microbiol       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 2.858

7.  Isolation and characterization of antifungal compound from Lactobacillus plantarum KCC-10 from forage silage with potential beneficial properties.

Authors:  M Valan Arasu; M-W Jung; S Ilavenil; M Jane; D-H Kim; K-D Lee; H-S Park; T-Y Hur; G-J Choi; Y-C Lim; N A Al-Dhabi; K-C Choi
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 3.772

8.  Interactive effects of molasses by homofermentative and heterofermentative inoculants on fermentation quality, nitrogen fractionation, nutritive value and aerobic stability of wilted alfalfa (Medicago sativa L) silage.

Authors:  F Hashemzadeh-Cigari; M Khorvash; G R Ghorbani; E Ghasemi; A Taghizadeh; S Kargar; W Z Yang
Journal:  J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl)       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 2.130

9.  Effect of copper and cobalt addition on digestion and growth in heifers fed diets containing alfalfa silage or corn crop residues.

Authors:  J M Lopez-Guisa; L D Satter
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 4.034

10.  Effects of microbial additives on chemical composition and fermentation characteristics of barley silage.

Authors:  S M Amanullah; D H Kim; H J Lee; Y H Joo; S B Kim; S C Kim
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.509

View more
  2 in total

1.  Effect of phenyllactic acid on silage fermentation and bacterial community of reed canary grass on the Qinghai Tibetan Plateau.

Authors:  Yongxiang Lu; Ping Li; Shiqie Bai; Shiyong Chen; Man Zhao; Wenlong Gou; Minghong You; Qiming Cheng
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 3.605

2.  Effects of different cutting methods and additives on the fermentation quality and microbial community of Saccharum arundinaceum silage.

Authors:  Yulong Zheng; Mengxin Li; Jinyi Xu; Hong Sun; Qiming Cheng; Yixiao Xie; Chunmei Wang; Chao Chen; Ping Li
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 6.064

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.