Literature DB >> 29846022

Predictive value of the baseline electrocardiogram ST-segment pattern in cardiogenic shock: Results from the CardShock Study.

Tuija Javanainen1, Heli Tolppanen1, Johan Lassus1, Markku S Nieminen1, Alessandro Sionis2, Jindrich Spinar3, José Silva-Cardoso4, Matias Greve Lindholm5, Marek Banaszewski6, Veli-Pekka Harjola7, Raija Jurkko1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The most common aetiology of cardiogenic shock (CS) is acute coronary syndrome (ACS), but even up to 20%-50% of CS is caused by other disorders. ST-segment deviations in the electrocardiogram (ECG) have been investigated in patients with ACS-related CS, but not in those with other CS aetiologies. We set out to explore the prevalence of different ST-segment patterns and their associations with the CS aetiology, clinical findings and 90-day mortality.
METHODS: We analysed the baseline ECG of 196 patients who were included in a multinational prospective study of CS. The patients were divided into 3 groups: (a) ST-segment elevation (STE). (b) ST-segment depression (STDEP). (c) No ST-segment deviation or ST-segment impossible to analyse (NSTD). A subgroup analysis of the ACS patients was conducted.
RESULTS: ST-segment deviations were present in 80% of the patients: 52% had STE and 29% had STDEP. STE was associated with the ACS aetiology, but one-fourth of the STDEP patients had aetiology other than ACS. The overall 90-day mortality was 41%: in STE 47%, STDEP 36% and NSTD 33%. In the multivariate mortality analysis, only STE predicted mortality (HR 1.74, CI95 1.07-2.84). In the ACS subgroup, the patients were equally effectively revascularized, and no differences in the survival were noted between the study groups.
CONCLUSION: ST-segment elevation is associated with the ACS aetiology and high mortality in the unselected CS population. If STE is not present, other aetiologies must be considered. When effectively revascularized, the prognosis is similar regardless of the ST-segment pattern in ACS-related CS.
© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  acute coronary syndrome; acute heart failure; cardiogenic shock; electrocardiography; prognosis

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29846022      PMCID: PMC6931659          DOI: 10.1111/anec.12561

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol        ISSN: 1082-720X            Impact factor:   1.468


  27 in total

1.  Mortality of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock treated by PCI is correlated to the infarct-related artery--results from the PL-ACS Registry.

Authors:  Przemysław Trzeciak; Marek Gierlotka; Mariusz Gąsior; Andrzej Lekston; Krzysztof Wilczek; Grzegorz Słonka; Zbigniew Kalarus; Marian Zembala; Bartosz Hudzik; Lech Poloński
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 4.164

2.  Clinical presentation and diagnosis of myocarditis.

Authors:  Alida L P Caforio; Renzo Marcolongo; Cristina Basso; Sabino Iliceto
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 3.  Electrocardiographic left ventricular strain pattern: everything old is new again.

Authors:  Douglas D Schocken
Journal:  J Electrocardiol       Date:  2014-06-13       Impact factor: 1.438

4.  Trends in mechanical circulatory support use and hospital mortality among patients with acute myocardial infarction and non-infarction related cardiogenic shock in the United States.

Authors:  Mahek Shah; Soumya Patnaik; Brijesh Patel; Pradhum Ram; Lohit Garg; Manyoo Agarwal; Sahil Agrawal; Shilpkumar Arora; Nilay Patel; Joyce Wald; Ulrich P Jorde
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 5.460

5.  Cardiogenic shock with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a report from the SHOCK Trial Registry. SHould we emergently revascularize Occluded coronaries for Cardiogenic shocK?

Authors:  A K Jacobs; J K French; J Col; L A Sleeper; J N Slater; L Carnendran; J Boland; X Jiang; T LeJemtel; J S Hochman
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction--etiologies, management and outcome: a report from the SHOCK Trial Registry. SHould we emergently revascularize Occluded Coronaries for cardiogenic shocK?

Authors:  J S Hochman; C E Buller; L A Sleeper; J Boland; V Dzavik; T A Sanborn; E Godfrey; H D White; J Lim; T LeJemtel
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  Effect of infarct location on the in-hospital prognosis of patients with first transmural myocardial infarction.

Authors:  S Thanavaro; R E Kleiger; M A Province; J W Hubert; J P Miller; R J Krone; G C Oliver
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 8.  Cardiogenic shock: basics and clinical considerations.

Authors:  Ramesh M Gowda; John T Fox; Ijaz A Khan
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2007-11-26       Impact factor: 4.164

9.  Differences in the profile, treatment, and prognosis of patients with cardiogenic shock by myocardial infarction classification: A report from NCDR.

Authors:  Monique L Anderson; Eric D Peterson; S Andrew Peng; Tracy Y Wang; E Magnus Ohman; Deepak L Bhatt; Jorge F Saucedo; Matthew T Roe
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2013-11-12

10.  Trends in incidence, management, and outcomes of cardiogenic shock complicating ST-elevation myocardial infarction in the United States.

Authors:  Dhaval Kolte; Sahil Khera; Wilbert S Aronow; Marjan Mujib; Chandrasekar Palaniswamy; Sachin Sule; Diwakar Jain; William Gotsis; Ali Ahmed; William H Frishman; Gregg C Fonarow
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2014-01-13       Impact factor: 5.501

View more
  2 in total

1.  Predictive value of the baseline electrocardiogram ST-segment pattern in cardiogenic shock: Results from the CardShock Study.

Authors:  Tuija Javanainen; Heli Tolppanen; Johan Lassus; Markku S Nieminen; Alessandro Sionis; Jindrich Spinar; José Silva-Cardoso; Matias Greve Lindholm; Marek Banaszewski; Veli-Pekka Harjola; Raija Jurkko
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 1.468

Review 2.  Cardiogenic Shock.

Authors:  Cyrus Vahdatpour; David Collins; Sheldon Goldberg
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2019-04-16       Impact factor: 5.501

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.