| Literature DB >> 29844780 |
Zeliha Selamoglu1, Cihan Dusgun1, Hasan Akgul2, Mehmet Fuat Gulhan3.
Abstract
It has been investigated the in-vitro antioxidant properties of ethanol extracts of the contained-allantoin plants in this study. Contained-allantoined plant samples Plantago lanceolata, Plantago major, Robinia pseudoacacia, Platanus orientalis and Aesculushippocastanum were tested at different concentrations. The antioxidant activities of plant samples were analysed by 1,1- diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical scavenging method, cupric reducing antioxidant capacity (CUPRAC), reducing power assay and β-carotene bleaching method. Plantago major plant showed the highest antioxidant capacity compared to other plant extracts in results of the in-vitro assays including 1,1- diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical scavenging method with 90.25 %, cupric reducing antioxidant capacity (CUPRAC) with 1.789 %, reducing power assay (FRAP) with 1.321 % and β-carotene bleaching method with 78.01 % in 1 mg/mL. The lowest antioxidant activity was determined in Robinia pseudoacacia plant. In conclusion, allantoin shows antioxidant properties and it has the positive effect on total antioxidant capacity.Entities:
Keywords: Allantoin; Turkey; antioxidant activity; in-vitro assays; plant extracts
Year: 2017 PMID: 29844780 PMCID: PMC5963650
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Iran J Pharm Res ISSN: 1726-6882 Impact factor: 1.696
Free radical scavenging activity using 1,1- Diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl radical (DPPH)
|
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.2 mg/mL | 0.4 mg/mL | 0.6 mg/mL | 0.8mg/mL | 1 mg/mL | |
|
| 69.75 | 74.75 | 80.00 | 84.50 | 90.25 |
|
| 50.50 | 67.75 | 72.25 | 77.75 | 84.25 |
|
| 43.75 | 65.75 | 72.50 | 76.25 | 78.25 |
|
| 46.50 | 69.75 | 75.25 | 78.75 | 80.25 |
|
| 44.75 | 58.25 | 68.75 | 78.00 | 80.50 |
| Ascorbic acid | 97.50 | 97.50 | 97.50 | 97.50 | 97.50 |
All tests were performed as triplicate and the results are showed as mean of data in the table
The results of CUPRAC assay
|
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.2 mg/mL | 0.4 mg/mL | 0.6 mg/mL | 0.8mg/mL | 1 mg/mL | |
|
| 1.330 | 1.694 | 1.741 | 1.753 | 1.789 |
|
| 1.001 | 1.339 | 1.491 | 1.571 | 1.679 |
|
| 0.789 | 0.820 | 0.907 | 1.230 | 1.515 |
|
| 0.827 | 1.222 | 1.251 | 1.429 | 1.583 |
|
| 0.840 | 1.350 | 1.594 | 1.732 | 1.772 |
| Ascorbik acid | 1.729 | 1.751 | 1.755 | 1.762 | 1.802 |
All tests were performed as triplicate and the results are showed as mean of data in the table
The results of reducing power assay
|
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.2 mg/mL | 0.4 mg/mL | 0.6 mg/mL | 0.8mg/mL | 1 mg/mL | |
|
| 1.209 | 1.243 | 1.269 | 1.287 | 1.321 |
|
| 1.149 | 1.198 | 1.218 | 1.231 | 1.255 |
|
| 1.112 | 1.600 | 1.174 | 1.204 | 1.229 |
|
| 1.149 | 1.209 | 1.225 | 1.241 | 1.247 |
|
| 1.194 | 1.214 | 1.248 | 1.271 | 1.281 |
| Control | 1.145 | ||||
All tests were performed as triplicate and the results are showed as mean of data in the table
The first inhibition of β-carotene bleaching assay (%).
|
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.2 mg/mL | 0.4 mg/mL | 0.6 mg/mL | 0.8mg/mL | 1 mg/mL | |
|
| 42.37 | 43.97 | 44.94 | 45.85 | 46.37 |
|
| 43.04 | 44.31 | 45.45 | 46.77 | 48.54 |
|
| 41.69 | 42.49 | 42.6 | 42.88 | 43.04 |
|
| 41.74 | 43.68 | 44.14 | 44.98 | 45.8 |
|
| 36.03 | 39.52 | 43.57 | 44.26 | 46.31 |
| Control | 92.34 | 92.98 | 93.21 | 93.68 | 94.55 |
All tests were performed as triplicate and the results are showed as mean of data in the table
The last inhibition of β-carotene bleaching assay (%).
|
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.2 mg/mL | 0.4 mg/mL | 0.6 mg/mL | 0.8mg/mL | 1 mg/mL | |
|
| 71.56 | 73.5 | 74.35 | 75.54 | 78.01 |
|
| 66.65 | 67.16 | 68.02 | 69.73 | 71.90 |
|
| 65.39 | 66.19 | 67.16 | 68.82 | 69.85 |
|
| 65.85 | 66.76 | 66.99 | 67.28 | 68.42 |
|
| 63.91 | 65.96 | 68.13 | 70.30 | 71.50 |
| Control | 92.34 | 92.98 | 93.21 | 93.68 | 94.55 |
All tests were performed as triplicate and the results are showed as mean of data in the table