| Literature DB >> 33101027 |
Valeria Conti1, Graziamaria Corbi2, Teresa Iannaccone1, Bianca Corrado1, Luigi Giugliano1, Serena Lembo1, Amelia Filippelli1, Maurizio Guida1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The prevention or early treatment of pathological scars is the most appropriate therapeutic approach. Gels and patches containing onion extract and allantoin are safe and effective in patients with scars of various origins and severity. However, no controlled studies have evaluated the effects of the patch formulation in women after Cesarean delivery. This study aimed to investigate the effects of a patch containing Allium cepa and allantoin on Cesarean section (C-section) scars.Entities:
Keywords: allantoin; cesarean delivery; natural products; onion extract; wound healing
Year: 2020 PMID: 33101027 PMCID: PMC7546780 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2020.569514
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Pharmacol ISSN: 1663-9812 Impact factor: 5.810
Figure 1Disposition of women in the study design adapted by the CONSORT algorithm.
Characteristics of the study population subdivided for the number of C-section and the use or not of the patch.
| Group A1 | Group A2 | Group B1 | Group B2 | p | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
|
| 27.20 (3.19) * | 28.44 (4.31)** | 33.38 (3.25) | 34.33 (5.73) |
|
|
| 23.23–31.17 | 26.14–30.73 | 30.66–36.09 | 30.70–37.97 | |
|
| |||||
|
| 0 | 0 | 1.25 (0.46)^ | 1.25 (0.45)^^ |
|
|
| 0 | 0 | 0.86–1.64 | 0.96–1.54 | |
|
|
| ||||
|
| 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |
|
| 0 (0) | 1 (4.35) | 1 (4.54) | 0 (0) | |
|
| 24 (100) | 22 (95.65) | 21 (95.45) | 24 (100) | |
|
| 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |
|
| 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |
|
| 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |
|
| |||||
|
| 22.40 (3.29) | 21.69 (4.44) | 22.75(3.85) | 21.25(3.79) |
|
|
| 12.20 (2.49) | 12.13 (5.03) | 12.12 (4.52) | 8.25 (4.47) |
|
|
| |||||
|
| 21.80 (4.32) | 18.50 (3.93) | 25.38 (6.09) | 21.75 (8.4) |
|
|
| 14.00 (3.39) | 9.63 (4.22)# | 16.50 (7.07)## | 8.33 (5.93) |
|
*Group B2 vs. Group A1: p = 0.031; **Group B2 vs. Group A2: p = 0.009; ^ Group B1 vs. Group A: p < 0.0001; ^^Group B2 vs. Group A: p < 0.0001; #Group B1 vs. Group A2: p = 0.030; ##Group B2 vs. Group B1: p = 0.011.
In bold are reported the statistically significant p-values.
Figure 2Digital photographs of two subjects for each group at baseline and 4 weeks.
Figure 3(A) The subjects of Group B2 (Previous C-section-Patch) showed a significant improvement (p = 0.012) in the total score according to POSAS Patient scale in comparison with the subjects in group A2 (first C-section-Patch). (B) The subjects in Group B2 showed a significant improvement in total score according to POSAS Observer scale when compared with all other groups (vs. group B1 (Previous C-section-NO patch), p = 0.013; vs. group A2, p = 0.002; vs. group A1 (First C-section- NO Patch), p = 0.007). No other differences were found in Group A.
Figure 4(A) The subjects in Group B2 (Previous C-section-Patch) showed a significant improvement in pigmentation according to POSAS Observer scale when compared with all other groups (vs. Group B1 (Previous C-section-NO patch), p = 0.015; vs. group A2 (First C-section-Patch), p = 0.002; vs. Group A1 (First C-section- NO Patch), p = 0.045). (B) The subjects in group B2 showed a significant improvement (p = 0.039) in relief according to POSAS observer scale in comparison with the group B1. No other differences were found in group A and between groups. (C) The subjects in group B2 showed a significant improvement (p = 0.046) in pliability according to POSAS Observer scale when compared to the group B1. No other differences were found in group B and between groups.