| Literature DB >> 29844538 |
Laura F Grogan1,2, Lee F Skerratt3, Lee Berger3, Scott D Cashins3, Robert D Trengove4,5, Joel P A Gummer4,5.
Abstract
Chytridiomycosis is among several recently emerged fungal diseases of wildlife that have caused decline or extinction of naïve populations. Despite recent advances in understanding pathogenesis, host response to infection remains poorly understood. Here we modelled a total of 162 metabolites across skin and liver tissues of 61 frogs from four populations (three long-exposed and one naïve to the fungus) of the Australian alpine tree frog (Litoria verreauxii alpina) throughout a longitudinal exposure experiment involving both infected and negative control individuals. We found that chytridiomycosis dramatically altered the organism-wide metabolism of clinically diseased frogs. Chytridiomycosis caused catastrophic failure of normal homeostatic mechanisms (interruption of biosynthetic and degradation metabolic pathways), and pronounced dysregulation of cellular energy metabolism. Key intermediates of the tricarboxylic acid cycle were markedly depleted, including in particular α-ketoglutarate and glutamate that together constitute a key nutrient pathway for immune processes. This study was the first to apply a non-targeted metabolomics approach to a fungal wildlife disease and specifically to dissect the host-pathogen interface of Bd-infected frogs. The patterns of metabolite accumulation we have identified reveal whole-body metabolic dysfunction induced by a fungal skin infection, and these findings have broad relevance for other fungal diseases.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29844538 PMCID: PMC5974026 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-26427-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Experimental design outlining the number of frogs from each population and treatment group (Bd exposed or unexposed control) sampled at each time point post exposure.
| Populations | Exposure – Day 0 | Day 4 | Day 8 | Day 14 | Clinically diseased |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grey Mare | 16 (3) | 4 (1) | 4 (1) | 4 (1) | 4 |
| Eucumbene | 14 (6) | 4 (2) | 4 (2) | 4 (2) | 2 |
| Kiandra | 14 (6) | 4 (2) | 4 (2) | 4 (2) | 2 |
| Ogilvies | 2 | — | — | — | 2 |
aTotal number of unexposed control frogs shown in parentheses; bNumber of unexposed control frogs sampled shown in parentheses.
Demographic characteristics of study subjects (including sample size, treatment group, gender ratios, mean mass at death, mean snout-urostyle length at death and mean and median infection intensity at death).
| Kiandra | Eucumbene | Grey Mare | Ogilvies | P valuea | dfa | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Exposed | Control | Exposed | Control | Exposed | Control | Exposed | |||
| Sample size | 14 | 6 | 14 | 6 | 16 | 3 | 2 | ||
| Genderb | 3M, 4F, 7U | 2M, 4U | 3M, 6F, 5U | 1M, 5F | 5M, 7F, 4U | 2F, 1U | 1M, 1F | ||
| Mean mass at death | 3.21 | 3.02 | 2.95 | 4.05 | 3.43 | 3.19 | 3.29 | 0.917 | 3 |
| Mean SUL at deathc | 30.29 | 30.72 | 28.79 | 32.10 | 32.01 | 32.03 | 31.80 | 0.150 | 3 |
| Mean ZSE at deathd | 429122.80 | 0.28 | 145852.98 | 0.00 | 148017.50 | 0.00 | 614937.50 | 0.697 | 3 |
| Median ZSE at death | 705.83 | 0.00 | 185.83 | 0.00 | 5955.83 | 0.00 | 614937.50 | ||
aStatistics comparing means between populations (pooling exposed and control frog values) using one-way ANOVA, P value and df degrees of freedom; bGenders represented by M for males, F for females and U for unknown gender; cSUL is snout-urostyle length measured with Vernier callipers; dZSE is zoospore equivalents as measured by qPCR.
Figure 1Box and whisker plots (with data points overlaid) of the relative concentration of identified metabolites of interest according to their sampling group (using geom_boxplot from ggplot2 R package). (A) Metabolites from skin samples, (B) metabolites from liver samples. Sham-exposed negative control group frogs were designated Group 0. Exposed/infected frogs sampled at various times post-exposure were designated Groups 1, 2, 3 and 4, corresponding to being sampled at 4, 8, 14 and 28–30 days post exposure, respectively. Box hinges represent first and third quartiles, and middle represents the median. Whiskers extend 1.5 times the inter-quartile range of the hinge. Boxes are ordered by relative metabolite importance.
Figure 2Partial Least Squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) scores plots of components one and two, comparing skin samples (A) and liver samples (B) as they cluster by sampling group. Sham-exposed negative control group frogs were designated Group 0. Exposed/infected frogs sampled at various times post-exposure were designated Groups 1, 2, 3 and 4, corresponding to being sampled at 4, 8, 14 and 28–30 days post exposure, respectively.
Figure 3Relative accumulation levels of skin metabolites (from frogs grouped by sampling period) associated with key cellular systems (A) Biosynthesis, (B) Degradation, (C) Energy, and (D) relative accumulation data for tricarboxylic acid cycle subsystem intermediates. Large dots represent mean data values for relevant metabolites involved in various subsystems, and small dots represent individual metabolite values. Vertical axis represents normalized relative metabolite accumulation values. Solid colour bars provide the cumulative sum of data values for relevant metabolites, and are more pronounced where many metabolites make a consistent contribution to change within a subsystem.
Figure 4Schematic representation of key intermediates and enzymes involved in the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle. The relative concentration of three key metabolites (citrate, α-ketoglutarate [2-oxoglutarate] and fumarate) is illustrated with the coloured boxes, representing the respective frog sample groups from left to right: (i) negative controls, (ii) 4 days post exposure (DPE), (iii) 8 DPE, (iv) 14 DPE, and (v) moribund.
Figure 5Box and whisker plots (with data points overlaid) of the relative concentration of identified metabolites of interest from skin samples according to their population of origin (using geom_boxplot from ggplot2 R package). Box hinges represent first and third quartiles, and middle represents the median. Whiskers extend 1.5 times the inter-quartile range of the hinge. Boxes are ordered by relative metabolite importance.
Figure 6Partial Least Squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) scores plots of components one and two, comparing skin samples (A) and liver samples (B) as they cluster by source population.
Key metabolites in both skin and liver tissues discriminating between experimental groups (including sampling periods post exposure and populations), demonstrating overlap in significant results between univariate (ANOVA, t-test pattern matching and SAM) and multivariate analyses (PLS-DA, top 30 VIP scores ranked on component 1).
| Group | Tissue | Metabolite identification | ANOVA FDR | Tukey’s HSD | Pattern matching | Correlation | SAM FDR | PLS-DA VIP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Time-series | Skin | a-Ketoglutaric acid, x TMS, 23.95, 1578 | 1.05E-05 | 4-0; 4-1; 4-2; 4-3 | 0.005854 | −0.50794 | 0 | 2.2876 |
| Serotonin, x TMS, 39.11, 2470 | 0.002533 | 4-0; 4-1; 4-2; 4-3 | 0 | 1.6147 | ||||
| Putrescine, x TMS, 22.45, 1506_putative | 0.036876 | 3-0; 4-0 | 0.005854 | 0.50557 | 0.00909 | 2.0726 | ||
| Adenine, 2 TMS, 29.74, 1869 | 0.036337 | 3-0; 4-0 | 0.005854 | 0.50493 | 0.00909 | 2.0262 | ||
| 5-Hydroxyindole-3-acetic acid, 3 TMS, 35.49, 2212 | 0.002533 | 4-0; 4-1; 4-2; 4-3 | 0.000346 | |||||
| L-Threonine, 3 TMS, 19.59, 1387 | 0.02635 | 3-0; 4-0 | 0.012166 | −0.472 | 0.003239 | 1.99 | ||
| L-Isoleucine, 2 TMS, 17.32, 1295 | 0.004158 | 4-0; 4-1; 4-2; 4-3 | 0.004607 | |||||
| DL-Tartaric acid 4TMS-like | 0.021251 | 4-0; 4-1; 4-2 | 0.039136 | −0.41978 | 0.00909 | |||
| Glutamic acid, 3 TMS, 24.79, 1623 | 0.004834 | 4-0; 4-1; 4-2; 4-3 | 0.039136 | −0.40884 | 0.003179 | |||
| Adenosine, 4 TMS, 41.49, 2642 | 0.039136 | 0.41253 | 0.042185 | |||||
| Urea, 2 TMS, 16.14, 1249 | 0.02635 | 1-0; 3-1 | 0.000829 | |||||
| Serine, 2 TMS, 16.43, 1260 | 0.029108 | 3-0; 3-2 | 0.003179 | 1.719 | ||||
| DL-Ornithine, 3 TMS, 24.71, 1623 | 0.012299 | 2-1; 3-2; 4-2 | 0.003293 | |||||
| L-Pyroglutamic acid, 2 TMS, 22.76, 1520_saturated | 0.032369 | 4-0; 4-2 | 0.039136 | −0.39293 | 0.019789 | |||
| L-Lysine, 4 TMS, 30.54, 1915 | 0.036876 | 2-1; 3-1; 4-1 | 0.006945 | 1.7061 | ||||
| Fumaric acid, 2 TMS, 18.29, 1357 | 0.02968 | 4-0; 4-3 | 0.027929 | |||||
| Aspartic acid, 2 TMS, 20.54, 1428 | 0.018362 | 1.651 | ||||||
| Cellobiose, x TMS, 42.19, 2962 | 0.040882 | 0.38103 | 0.039192 | 1.496 | ||||
| g-Aminobutyric acid, 3 TMS, 22.9, 1526 | 0.0409 | 4-0; 4-1; 4-3 | 0.00909 | |||||
| Myo-Inositol, 6 TMS, 33.38, 2081 | 0.042804 | −0.37252 | 0.032292 | |||||
| Liver | L-Isoleucine, 2 TMS, 17.32, 1295 | 3.51E-11 | 4-0; 2-1; 4-1; 3-2; 4-2; 4-3 | 4.15E-05 | 0.57373 | 0.003774 | 1.5512 | |
| L-Glutamic acid, 2 TMS, 22.7, 1519* | 2.86E-10 | 4-0; 4-1; 4-2; 4-3 | 2.50E-06 | −0.6347 | 0.011043 | 1.5014 | ||
| 5-Hydroxyindole-3-acetic acid, 3 TMS, 35.49, 2212 | 0.000582 | 4-0; 4-1; 4-2; 4-3 | 0.001556 | 0.45911 | 0.003029 | 2.5384 | ||
| D–Galactose, 5 TMS, MEOX, 29.94, 1880 | 0.025509 | 4-0; 4-1 | 0.011265 | −0.38718 | 0.003029 | 2.6805 | ||
| L-Pyroglutamic acid, 2 TMS, 22.76, 1520_saturated | 2.86E-10 | 4-0; 4-1; 4-2; 4-3 | 2.50E-06 | −0.63459 | 0.011043 | 1.501 | ||
| Citric acid, 4 TMS, 28.69, 1817 | 9.67E-07 | 4-0; 4-1; 4-2; 4-3 | 0.000752 | −0.4873 | 0.003029 | 1.966 | ||
| Putrescine, x TMS, 22.45, 1506_putative | 5.64E-07 | 4-0; 4-1; 4-2; 4-3 | 6.71E-06 | 0.61232 | 0.003029 | 2.5008 | ||
| a-Ketoglutaric acid, x TMS, 23.95, 1578 | 8.29E-05 | 4-0; 4-1; 4-2; 4-3 | 0.002517 | −0.44337 | 0.003029 | 1.9493 | ||
| L-Leucine, 2 TMS, 16.74, 1274 | 1.85E-08 | 4-0; 4-1; 3-2; 4-2; 4-3 | 4.18E-05 | 0.57127 | 0.011264 | |||
| Creatine. x TMS, 23.39, 1551 | 6.32E-05 | 4-0; 4-1; 4-2; 4-3 | 0.000752 | 0.48784 | 0.003029 | 1.9563 | ||
| D-Fructose-6-phosphate 6TMS, MEOX, 36.72, 2300-put | 5.97E-07 | 4-0; 4-1; 4-2; 4-3 | 0.002165 | −0.44874 | 0.003029 | 1.8381 | ||
| g-Aminobutyric acid, 3 TMS, 22.9, 1526 | 4.26E-05 | 4-0; 4-1; 3-2; 4-2 | 0.000315 | −0.51611 | 0.004805 | 1.7973 | ||
| D-Glucose-6-phosphate, 6 TMS, MEOX, 37.23, 2332 | 3.10E-06 | 4-0; 4-1; 4-2; 4-3 | 0.006038 | −0.41173 | 0.003029 | |||
| Fumaric acid, 2 TMS, 18.29, 1357 | 1.42E-06 | 4-0; 4-1; 4-2; 4-3 | 0.000934 | −0.47769 | 0.005732 | |||
| Serine, 3 TMS, 18.98, 1363 | 0.003442 | 3-0; 4-0; 4-1; 4-2 | 0.000661 | 0.49314 | 0.038474 | |||
| L-Lysine, x TMS, 29.32, 1852 | 6.32E-05 | 4-0; 4-1; 4-2; 4-3 | 0.003008 | 0.4358 | 0.00402 | 1.5988 | ||
| Urea, 2 TMS, 16.14, 1249 | 0.011043 | 1.5188 | ||||||
| Glycine, 3 TMS, 17.63, 1308 | 0.048096 | 4-0 | 0.003008 | 0.43531 | ||||
| Sucrose, 8 TMS, 41.32, 2630.1 | 0.005833 | 1-0; 2-0; 3-1; 3-2 | 0.008361 | |||||
| Adenine, 2 TMS, 29.74, 1869 | 0.016867 | 4-0; 4-1; 4-2; 4-3 | 0.011043 | |||||
| Site | Skin | Pantothenic acid, O,O,O-TMS-putative | 0.012106 | G-E; K-E | 0.010965 | −0.51381 | 0.002488 | 2.1179 |
| Myo-Inositol, 6 TMS, 33.38, 2081 | 0.017097 | K-E; K-G | 0.0199 | |||||
| L-Isoleucine, 2 TMS, 17.32, 1295 | 0.026777 | K-E | 0.010965 | 0.49005 | ||||
| L-Leucine, 2 TMS, 16.74, 1274 | 0.026777 | K-E; K-G | 0.010965 | 0.48099 | 0.039608 | 1.5988 | ||
| Creatine. x TMS, 23.39, 1551 | 0.046951 | K-E; K-G | 0.016922 | 0.45692 | 0.036566 | 1.8447 | ||
| Aspartic acid, 2 TMS, 20.54, 1428 | 1.9701 | |||||||
| L-Threonine, 2 TMS, 17.37, 1298 | 1.8778 | |||||||
| D–Ribose, 4 TMS, MEOX, 25.89, 1678 | 0.033096 | 0.42058 | ||||||
| saturated_Guanine manual | 1.7444 | |||||||
| Serotonin, x TMS, 39.11, 2470* | 1.7352 | |||||||
| Liver | D–Turanose, 7 TMS, 42.29, 2702 | 2.7638 | ||||||
| Urea, 2 TMS, 16.14, 1249 | 2.507 | |||||||
| Thymine, 2 TMS, 19.94, 1403 | 2.4842 | |||||||
| L-Lysine, 3 TMS, 26.54, 1712 | 2.0644 | |||||||
| Myo-Inositol, 6 TMS, 33.38, 2081.1 | 1.8873 | |||||||
| D-Fructose-6-phosphate 6TMS, MEOX, 36.72, 2300-putative | 1.7514 | |||||||
| Sucrose, 8 TMS, 41.32, 2630.1 | 1.734 | |||||||
| a-Ketoglutaric acid, x TMS, 23.95, 1578 | 1.6361 | |||||||
| beta-Alanine, 3TMS, 20.58, 1429 | 1.6332 | |||||||
| Cellobiose, x TMS, 42.19, 2962 | 1.4796 |
Comparisons found to be significant with post-hoc Tukey’s HSD tests are listed, as are the respective correlations for the pattern matching approach. Sham-exposed negative control group frogs were designated Group 0. Exposed/infected frogs sampled at various times post-exposure were designated Groups 1, 2, 3 and 4, corresponding to being sampled at 4, 8, 14 and 28–30 days post exposure, respectively. Source populations (sites) are as follows: Eucumbene, Grey Mare, Kiandra are represented by E, G and K respectively. Where metabolites were not found to be significantly different with a particular test, values have been omitted.
*Quantitation re-calculated from a lesser abundant ion (or isotope) within mass spectrum for accurate measurement of metabolites nearing the upper dynamic concentration of the MS.