| Literature DB >> 29843451 |
Koichi Saeki1, Sumio Hayakawa2, Shogo Nakano3, Sohei Ito4, Yumiko Oishi5, Yasuo Suzuki6, Mamoru Isemura7.
Abstract
Green tea has been shown to have beneficial effects on many diseases such as cancer, obesity, inflammatory diseases, and neurodegenerative disorders. The major green tea component, epigallocatechin-3-O-gallate (EGCG), has been demonstrated to contribute to these effects through its anti-oxidative and pro-oxidative properties. Furthermore, several lines of evidence have indicated that the binding affinity of EGCG to specific proteins may explain its mechanism of action. This review article aims to reveal how EGCG-protein interactions can explain the mechanism by which green tea/EGCG can exhibit health beneficial effects. We conducted a literature search, using mainly the PubMed database. The results showed that several methods such as dot assays, affinity gel chromatography, surface plasmon resonance, computational docking analyses, and X-ray crystallography have been used for this purpose. These studies have provided evidence to show how EGCG can fit or occupy the position in or near functional sites and induce a conformational change, including a quaternary conformational change in some cases. Active site blocking, steric hindrance by binding of EGCG near an active site or induced conformational change appeared to cause inhibition of enzymatic activity and other biological activities of proteins, which are related to EGCG's biological oligomer and formation of their toxic aggregates, leading to the prevention of neurodegenerative diseases and amyloidosis. In conclusion, these studies have provided useful information on the action of green tea/catechins and would lead to future studies that will provide further evidence for rational EGCG therapy and use EGCG as a lead compound for drug design.Entities:
Keywords: EGCG; affinity chromatography; binding interaction; cancer; catechin; epidemiology; green tea; health benefits; molecular docking; protein
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29843451 PMCID: PMC6099932 DOI: 10.3390/molecules23061295
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Chemical structures of major green tea catechins, EGCG and related compounds.
Binding Interaction between EGCG and protein as revealed by affinity gel chromatography (AGC) and/or pull-down (PD) methods with EGCG-conjugated agarose.
| Experimental Mode | Protein | Binding Characteristics | Head Author (Year) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AGC | Fibronectin | EGCG binds to the carboxyl-terminal heparin-binding domain. | Sazuka, M. (1996;1998) | [ |
| AGC | MMP-2 * | EGCG binding to MMP-2 was identified by gelatin zymography. | Sazuka, M. (1997) | [ |
| AGC | MMP-9 ** | EGCG binding to MMP-9 was identified by gelatin zymography. | Sazuka, M. (1997) | [ |
| AGC, PD | Vimentin | EGCG binds to the region of 50–63 residues. | Ermakova, S. (2005) | [ |
| PD | HSP90 ** | EGCG binds to a C-terminal geldanamycin binding site (amino acid residues 538–728) | Palermo, C.M. (2005) | [ |
| PD | GRP78 ** | EGCG binds to the ATPase catalytic domain (211–654 residues) | Ermakova, S.P. (2006) | [ |
| PD | IGF1R ** | The participating residues in the binding include Gln977, Lys1003, MEet1052, The1053, and Asp1123EGCG binds to the ATP binding pocket in β-subunit. | Li, M. (2007) | [ |
| PD | Fyn | EGCG binds to the SH2 domain, but not the SH3 domain | He, Z. (2008) | [ |
| PD | ZAP70 ** | EGCG binds to an ATP binding siteGlu415, Ala417, Lys369, Asp479, Glu386. | Shim, J.H. (2008) | [ |
| PD | G3BP1 | EGCG binds to the region of amino acid residues 226–340. | Shim, J.H. (2010) | [ |
| PD | Pin1 *** | EGCG bound to WW domain with two conserved tryptophans (1–39) pSer/Thr–Pro recognition loop of Met15–S16-R17-S18-R21-Tyr23 and to the peptidyl prolyl isomerase domain of Pin. EGCG creates several strong contacts with Pin1 at Asp112, Ser114, Trp73, and Ser114. | Urusova, D.V. (2011) | [ |
| PD | TRAF6 ** | EGCG binds to TRAF6 at the residues of Gln54, Gly55, Asp57 ILe72, Cys73 and Lys96. Mutation of Gln54, Asp57, ILe72 in TRAF6 destroys EGCG binding to TRAF6. | Zhang, J. (2016) | [ |
* The binding interaction with EGCG as revealed by MDA is depicted in Figure 3; ** The binding interaction with EGCG was confirmed by MDA (Section 4); *** The binding interaction with EGCG as revealed by X-ray crystallography is depicted in Figure 4.
Figure 2AGC showing the binding between EGCG and TGFβRII [39]. (A) Each of the fractions (fraction numbers 29–40) bound to and eluted from an EGCG-agarose column was spotted onto a membrane and stained with Coomassie brilliant blue (CBB) to detect proteins. (B) The EGCG-bound fractions (29–37) in A were examined by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting with anti-TGFβR antibodies. Use kindly permitted by the publisher of World Journal of Experimental Medicine, Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. doi:10.5493/wjem.v3.i4.100.
Figure 3Interaction of EGCG with MMPs as examined by MDA [53]. Interactions in EGCG and MMP2 (A,B) and MMP14 (C,D) are shown. The green dotted lines represent the expected hydrogen bonds in a complex of EGCG and MMP2 (B) and MMP14 (D). The orange dotted lines show the expected π-interactions in the MMP2 (B) and MMP14 (D). Reproduction kindly permitted by Springer International Publishing AG, the publisher of Molecular and Cellular Biochemstry, doi:10.1007/s11010-016-2903-y.
Figure 4X-ray crystal structure analysis of protein/GTC complexes [28,85,86]. The protein/ligand contacts are schematized using the protein data bank (PDB) (code: 3NG5, Transthyretin; 3QMU, GDH; 3OOB, Pin1) and LIGPLOT+ program [92]. Hydrogen bonds are displayed as dotted green lines and van der Waals interactions as red stellations. The water molecules are shown as cyan spheres.