Andrea J Loizeau1,2, Michele L Shaffer3, Daniel A Habtemariam1, Laura C Hanson4, Angelo E Volandes5, Susan L Mitchell1,6. 1. Hebrew SeniorLife Institute for Aging Research, Boston, Massachusetts. 2. University Research Priority Program, Dynamics of Healthy Aging, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. 3. Department of Statistics, University of Washington, Seattle. 4. Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research and School of Medicine, Division of Geriatric Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill. 5. Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston. 6. Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Abstract
Importance: Prognostication in advanced dementia is challenging but may influence care. Objectives: To determine the accuracy of proxies' prognostic estimates for nursing home residents with advanced dementia, identify factors associated with those estimates, and examine the association between their estimates and use of burdensome interventions. Design, Setting, and Participants: Data were combined from 2 studies that prospectively followed 764 residents with advanced dementia and their proxies in Boston-area nursing homes for 12 months: (1) the Study of Pathogen Resistance and Exposure to Antimicrobials in Dementia, conducted from September 2009 to November 2012 (362 resident/proxy dyads; 35 facilities); and (2) theEducational Video to Improve nursing home Carein End-Stage Dementia, conducted from March 2013 to July 2017 (402 resident/proxy dyads; 62 facilities). Proxies were the residents' formally or informally designated medical decision makers. Main Outcomes and Measures: During quarterly telephone interviews, proxies stated whether they believed the resident would live less than 1 month, 1 to 6 months, 7 to 12 months, or more than 12 months. Prognostic estimates were compared with resident survival. Resident and proxy characteristics associated with proxy prognostic estimates were determined. The association between prognostic estimates and whether residents experienced any of the following was determined: hospital transfers, parenteral therapy, tube feeding, venipunctures, and bladder catheterizations. Results:The residents' mean (SD) age was 86.6 (7.3) years; 631 (82.6%) were women and 133 (17.4%) were men. Of the 764 residents, 310 (40.6%) died later than 12 months. Proxies estimated survival with moderate accuracy (C statistic, 0.67). When proxies perceived the resident would die within 6 months, they were more likely to report being asked (183 [7.2%] of 2526) vs not being asked (126 [5.0%] of 2526) about goals of care by nursing home clinicians (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.94; 95% CI, 1.50-2.52). Residents were less likely to experience burdensome interventions when the proxy prognostic estimate was less than 6 months (89 [4.4%] of 2031) vs greater than 6 months (1008 [49.6%] of 2031) (AOR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.34-0.62). Conclusions and Relevance: Proxies estimated the prognosis of nursing home residents with advanced dementia with moderate accuracy. Having been asked about their opinion about the goal of care was associated with the proxies' perception that the resident had less than 6 months to live and that perception was associated with a lower likelihood the resident experienced burdensome interventions.
RCT Entities:
Importance: Prognostication in advanced dementia is challenging but may influence care. Objectives: To determine the accuracy of proxies' prognostic estimates for nursing home residents with advanced dementia, identify factors associated with those estimates, and examine the association between their estimates and use of burdensome interventions. Design, Setting, and Participants: Data were combined from 2 studies that prospectively followed 764 residents with advanced dementia and their proxies in Boston-area nursing homes for 12 months: (1) the Study of Pathogen Resistance and Exposure to Antimicrobials in Dementia, conducted from September 2009 to November 2012 (362 resident/proxy dyads; 35 facilities); and (2) the Educational Video to Improve nursing home Care in End-Stage Dementia, conducted from March 2013 to July 2017 (402 resident/proxy dyads; 62 facilities). Proxies were the residents' formally or informally designated medical decision makers. Main Outcomes and Measures: During quarterly telephone interviews, proxies stated whether they believed the resident would live less than 1 month, 1 to 6 months, 7 to 12 months, or more than 12 months. Prognostic estimates were compared with resident survival. Resident and proxy characteristics associated with proxy prognostic estimates were determined. The association between prognostic estimates and whether residents experienced any of the following was determined: hospital transfers, parenteral therapy, tube feeding, venipunctures, and bladder catheterizations. Results: The residents' mean (SD) age was 86.6 (7.3) years; 631 (82.6%) were women and 133 (17.4%) were men. Of the 764 residents, 310 (40.6%) died later than 12 months. Proxies estimated survival with moderate accuracy (C statistic, 0.67). When proxies perceived the resident would die within 6 months, they were more likely to report being asked (183 [7.2%] of 2526) vs not being asked (126 [5.0%] of 2526) about goals of care by nursing home clinicians (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.94; 95% CI, 1.50-2.52). Residents were less likely to experience burdensome interventions when the proxy prognostic estimate was less than 6 months (89 [4.4%] of 2031) vs greater than 6 months (1008 [49.6%] of 2031) (AOR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.34-0.62). Conclusions and Relevance: Proxies estimated the prognosis of nursing home residents with advanced dementia with moderate accuracy. Having been asked about their opinion about the goal of care was associated with the proxies' perception that the resident had less than 6 months to live and that perception was associated with a lower likelihood the resident experienced burdensome interventions.
Authors: Susan L Mitchell; Susan C Miller; Joan M Teno; Roger B Davis; Michele L Shaffer Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2010-11 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: Elizabeth A Boyd; Bernard Lo; Leah R Evans; Grace Malvar; Latifat Apatira; John M Luce; Douglas B White Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2010-05 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Susan L Mitchell; Joan M Teno; Dan K Kiely; Michele L Shaffer; Richard N Jones; Holly G Prigerson; Ladislav Volicer; Jane L Givens; Mary Beth Hamel Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2009-10-15 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Andrea Jutta Loizeau; Simon M Cohen; Susan L Mitchell; Nathan Theill; Stefanie Eicher; Mike Martin; Florian Riese Journal: Neurodegener Dis Date: 2019-04-23 Impact factor: 2.977
Authors: Aluem Tark; Leah V Estrada; Mary E Tresgallo; Denise D Quigley; Patricia W Stone; Mansi Agarwal Journal: Palliat Med Date: 2020-03-10 Impact factor: 4.762
Authors: Mathias Schlögl; Anand S Iyer; Florian Riese; David Blum; Lanier O'Hare; Tejaswini Kulkarni; Sophie Pautex; Jan Schildmann; Keith M Swetz; Pallavi Kumar; Christopher A Jones Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2021-07-14 Impact factor: 2.947