Andrea Jutta Loizeau1,2,3, Simon M Cohen4, Susan L Mitchell4,5, Nathan Theill6,7,8, Stefanie Eicher6,7, Mike Martin6,7,9, Florian Riese6,8. 1. University Research Priority Program "Dynamics of Healthy Aging," University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland, AndreaLoizeau@hsl.harvard.edu. 2. Center for Gerontology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland, AndreaLoizeau@hsl.harvard.edu. 3. Hebrew SeniorLife Hinda and Arthur Marcus Institute for Aging Research, Boston, Massachusetts, USA, AndreaLoizeau@hsl.harvard.edu. 4. Hebrew SeniorLife Hinda and Arthur Marcus Institute for Aging Research, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 5. Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 6. University Research Priority Program "Dynamics of Healthy Aging," University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. 7. Center for Gerontology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. 8. Division of Psychiatry Research and Psychogeriatric Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. 9. Department of Psychology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND:Assisted dying and continuous deep sedation (CDS) are controversial practices. Little is known about the perceptions of physicians and surrogates about these practices for patients with advanced dementia. OBJECTIVES: To describe and compare physician and surrogate agreement with the use of assisted dying and CDS in advanced dementia. DESIGN, SETTING, SUBJECTS: Physicians (n = 64) and surrogates (n = 168) of persons with advanced dementia were recruited as part of a randomized controlled trial in Switzerland that tested decision support tools in this population. METHODS: At baseline, the participants were asked about their agreement with assisted dying and CDS in advanced dementia using the following response options: "completely agree," "somewhat agree," "somewhat disagree," "completely disagree," and "do not know." Multivariable logistic regressions compared the likelihood that surrogates versus physicians would completely or somewhat agree (vs. completely or somewhat disagree) with these practices. RESULTS:The physicians and surrogates, respectively, had a mean age (SD) of 50.6 years (9.9) and 57.4 years (14.6); 46.9% (n = 30/64) and 68.9% (n = 115/167) were women. A total of 20.3% (n = 13/64) of the physicians and 47.0% (n = 79/168) of the surrogates agreed with assisted dying in advanced dementia. Surrogates were significantly more likely to agree with this practice than physicians (adjusted odds ratio, 3.87; 95% CI: 1.94, 7.69). With regard to CDS, 51.6% (n = 33/64) of the physicians and 41.9% (n = 70/169) of the surrogates agreed with this practice, which did not differ significantly between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: The surrogates were more agreeable to considering assisted dying in the setting of advanced dementia than the physicians, and about half of the participants in both groups reported CDS to be an appropriate option for this population.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Assisted dying and continuous deep sedation (CDS) are controversial practices. Little is known about the perceptions of physicians and surrogates about these practices for patients with advanced dementia. OBJECTIVES: To describe and compare physician and surrogate agreement with the use of assisted dying and CDS in advanced dementia. DESIGN, SETTING, SUBJECTS: Physicians (n = 64) and surrogates (n = 168) of persons with advanced dementia were recruited as part of a randomized controlled trial in Switzerland that tested decision support tools in this population. METHODS: At baseline, the participants were asked about their agreement with assisted dying and CDS in advanced dementia using the following response options: "completely agree," "somewhat agree," "somewhat disagree," "completely disagree," and "do not know." Multivariable logistic regressions compared the likelihood that surrogates versus physicians would completely or somewhat agree (vs. completely or somewhat disagree) with these practices. RESULTS: The physicians and surrogates, respectively, had a mean age (SD) of 50.6 years (9.9) and 57.4 years (14.6); 46.9% (n = 30/64) and 68.9% (n = 115/167) were women. A total of 20.3% (n = 13/64) of the physicians and 47.0% (n = 79/168) of the surrogates agreed with assisted dying in advanced dementia. Surrogates were significantly more likely to agree with this practice than physicians (adjusted odds ratio, 3.87; 95% CI: 1.94, 7.69). With regard to CDS, 51.6% (n = 33/64) of the physicians and 41.9% (n = 70/169) of the surrogates agreed with this practice, which did not differ significantly between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: The surrogates were more agreeable to considering assisted dying in the setting of advanced dementia than the physicians, and about half of the participants in both groups reported CDS to be an appropriate option for this population.
Authors: Sophie M Bruinsma; Judith A C Rietjens; Jane E Seymour; Livia Anquinet; Agnes van der Heide Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2012-06-01 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: Livia Anquinet; Judith A C Rietjens; An Vandervoort; Jenny T van der Steen; Robert Vander Stichele; Luc Deliens; Lieve Van den Block Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2013-09-03 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Susan L Mitchell; Joan M Teno; Dan K Kiely; Michele L Shaffer; Richard N Jones; Holly G Prigerson; Ladislav Volicer; Jane L Givens; Mary Beth Hamel Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2009-10-15 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Simone A Hendriks; Martin Smalbrugge; Cees M P M Hertogh; Jenny T van der Steen Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2013-07-31 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: Pauline S C Kouwenhoven; Natasja J H Raijmakers; Johannes J M van Delden; Judith A C Rietjens; Donald G van Tol; Suzanne van de Vathorst; Nienke de Graeff; Heleen A M Weyers; Agnes van der Heide; Ghislaine J M W van Thiel Journal: BMC Med Ethics Date: 2015-01-28 Impact factor: 2.652