Literature DB >> 29809162

Simulations of 3D bioprinting: predicting bioprintability of nanofibrillar inks.

Johan Göhl1, Kajsa Markstedt, Andreas Mark, Karl Håkansson, Paul Gatenholm, Fredrik Edelvik.   

Abstract

3D bioprinting with cell containing bioinks show great promise in the biofabrication of patient specific tissue constructs. To fulfil the multiple requirements of a bioink, a wide range of materials and bioink composition are being developed and evaluated with regard to cell viability, mechanical performance and printability. It is essential that the printability and printing fidelity is not neglected since failure in printing the targeted architecture may be catastrophic for the survival of the cells and consequently the function of the printed tissue. However, experimental evaluation of bioinks printability is time-consuming and must be kept at a minimum, especially when 3D bioprinting with cells that are valuable and costly. This paper demonstrates how experimental evaluation could be complemented with computer based simulations to evaluate newly developed bioinks. Here, a computational fluid dynamics simulation tool was used to study the influence of different printing parameters and evaluate the predictability of the printing process. Based on data from oscillation frequency measurements of the evaluated bioinks, a full stress rheology model was used, where the viscoelastic behaviour of the material was captured. Simulation of the 3D bioprinting process is a powerful tool and will help in reducing the time and cost in the development and evaluation of bioinks. Moreover, it gives the opportunity to isolate parameters such as printing speed, nozzle height, flow rate and printing path to study their influence on the printing fidelity and the viscoelastic stresses within the bioink. The ability to study these features more extensively by simulating the printing process will result in a better understanding of what influences the viability of cells in 3D bioprinted tissue constructs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29809162     DOI: 10.1088/1758-5090/aac872

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biofabrication        ISSN: 1758-5082            Impact factor:   9.954


  14 in total

1.  Optimization of gelatin-alginate composite bioink printability using rheological parameters: a systematic approach.

Authors:  Teng Gao; Gregory J Gillispie; Joshua S Copus; Anil Kumar Pr; Young-Joon Seol; Anthony Atala; James J Yoo; Sang Jin Lee
Journal:  Biofabrication       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 9.954

Review 2.  Recent advances in 3D printing of nanocellulose: structure, preparation, and application prospects.

Authors:  Liang Ying Ee; Sam Fong Yau Li
Journal:  Nanoscale Adv       Date:  2020-12-28

3.  Alginate-Lysozyme Nanofibers Hydrogels with Improved Rheological Behavior, Printability and Biological Properties for 3D Bioprinting Applications.

Authors:  Maria C Teixeira; Nicole S Lameirinhas; João P F Carvalho; Bruno F A Valente; Jorge Luís; Liliana Pires; Helena Oliveira; Martinho Oliveira; Armando J D Silvestre; Carla Vilela; Carmen S R Freire
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-26       Impact factor: 5.719

4.  The Influence of Printing Parameters and Cell Density on Bioink Printing Outcomes.

Authors:  Gregory J Gillispie; Albert Han; Meryem Uzun-Per; John Fisher; Antonios G Mikos; Muhammad Khalid Khan Niazi; James J Yoo; Sang Jin Lee; Anthony Atala
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2020-10-14       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 5.  Physical and Chemical Factors Influencing the Printability of Hydrogel-based Extrusion Bioinks.

Authors:  Sang Cheon Lee; Gregory Gillispie; Peter Prim; Sang Jin Lee
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 60.622

6.  Recent Advances in 3D Printing with Protein-Based Inks.

Authors:  Xuan Mu; Francesca Agostinacchio; Ning Xiang; Ying Pei; Yousef Khan; Chengchen Guo; Peggy Cebe; Antonella Motta; David L Kaplan
Journal:  Prog Polym Sci       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 29.190

Review 7.  Biomechanical factors in three-dimensional tissue bioprinting.

Authors:  Liqun Ning; Carmen J Gil; Boeun Hwang; Andrea S Theus; Lilanni Perez; Martin L Tomov; Holly Bauser-Heaton; Vahid Serpooshan
Journal:  Appl Phys Rev       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 19.162

8.  The future of skin toxicology testing - Three-dimensional bioprinting meets microfluidics.

Authors:  Wei Long Ng; Wai Yee Yeong
Journal:  Int J Bioprint       Date:  2019-09-20

Review 9.  Natural-Based Hydrogels for Tissue Engineering Applications.

Authors:  Manuel Gomez-Florit; Alberto Pardo; Rui M A Domingues; Ana L Graça; Pedro S Babo; Rui L Reis; Manuela E Gomes
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-12-11       Impact factor: 4.411

Review 10.  Printability and Shape Fidelity of Bioinks in 3D Bioprinting.

Authors:  Andrea Schwab; Riccardo Levato; Matteo D'Este; Susanna Piluso; David Eglin; Jos Malda
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2020-08-28       Impact factor: 60.622

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.