Literature DB >> 29800596

Your favorite number is special (to you): Evidence for item-level differences in retrieval of information from numerals.

Danielle S Dickson1, Kara D Federmeier2.   

Abstract

Arabic numerals have come to be used for many purposes beyond representing a particular quantity (e.g., as a label for an athlete on their jersey), but it remains to be determined how this type of meaningfulness is accessed and utilized by readers. Motivated by previous work showing that item-level ratings of personal familiarity can influence traditional indices of memory retrieval, we recorded ERPs while participants read double-digit Arabic numerals (e.g., "65"), presented in a list, and rated whether or not each was familiar/personally meaningful. All numbers repeated after a few intervening trials. The effect of number repetition on the N400 was not impacted by subjective judgments of familiarity, suggesting that all numbers (personally meaningful or not) make initial contact with semantics, facilitating semantic access on second exposure. However, consistent with findings from prior studies of memory for letter strings and visual patterns, there was a late positivity (LPC) on second presentation, selective to numbers rated as familiar. This is the first electrophysiological evidence that readers can use Arabic numerals to guide explicit retrieval of non-numerical information.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ERPs; Familiarity; Memory; N400; Numerical cognition

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29800596      PMCID: PMC6486889          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.05.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  38 in total

1.  Brain responses to nouns, verbs and class-ambiguous words in context.

Authors:  K D Federmeier; J B Segal; T Lombrozo; M Kutas
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 13.501

2.  Remembering and knowing: electrophysiological distinctions at encoding but not retrieval.

Authors:  Joel L Voss; Ken A Paller
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-02-05       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Brain Potentials during Memory Retrieval Provide Neurophysiological Support for the Distinction between Conscious Recollection and Priming.

Authors:  K A Paller; M Kutas
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Who Did What and When? Using Word- and Clause-Level ERPs to Monitor Working Memory Usage in Reading.

Authors:  J W King; M Kutas
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Memory for words and novel visual patterns: repetition, recognition, and encoding effects in the event-related brain potential.

Authors:  C Van Petten; A J Senkfor
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 4.016

6.  Electrophysiological evidence for a postperceptual locus of suppression during the attentional blink.

Authors:  E K Vogel; S J Luck; K L Shapiro
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Event-related brain potential correlates of two states of conscious awareness in memory.

Authors:  E Düzel; A P Yonelinas; G R Mangun; H J Heinze; E Tulving
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-05-27       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Lexical contribution to nonword-repetition effects: evidence from event-related potentials.

Authors:  M D Rugg; M E Nagy
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1987-11

9.  Pace Yourself: Intraindividual Variability in Context Use Revealed by Self-paced Event-related Brain Potentials.

Authors:  Brennan R Payne; Kara D Federmeier
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2017-01-27       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Amnesia: a disconnection syndrome?

Authors:  E K Warrington; L Weiskrantz
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 3.139

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.