Literature DB >> 19457375

Remembering and knowing: electrophysiological distinctions at encoding but not retrieval.

Joel L Voss1, Ken A Paller.   

Abstract

Contemporary memory theories often distinguish between contextual recollection and acontextual familiarity as two fundamentally different types of recognition memory. It is currently unclear whether recollection and familiarity are supported by two correspondingly distinct retrieval mechanisms, or whether the same type of retrieval processing supports both phenomena. Electrophysiological findings in humans have widely been cited as support for the former, two-process position, in that late-onset parietal "LPC" potentials have been linked to recollection and earlier frontal "FN400" potentials to familiarity. However, recognition memory is generally studied using conceptually rich stimuli such as words, which leaves open an alternative interpretation that one or both of these electrophysiological signals reflect conceptual processing distinct from recollection and familiarity per se. We tested this hypothesis using conceptually impoverished kaleidoscope images, such that opportunities for conceptual processing were minimized. Recollection-based and familiarity-based recognition in a remember/know paradigm were both indexed by LPC potentials. Old/new amplitude differences were greater for recollection compared to familiarity. Despite ample familiarity-based recognition, FN400 old/new effects were not observed, consistent with the contention that these potentials index conceptual processing rather than familiarity. These results cast doubt on interpretations of prior electrophysiological evidence obtained using conceptually rich stimuli as dissociating neural mechanisms of recollection and familiarity. We also found that neural events during encoding differentially predicted later recollection versus later familiarity. Collectively, these findings suggest that the engagement of distinct encoding processes can preferentially lead to recollection or to familiarity even if one type of retrieval process is responsible for both memory expressions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19457375     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.01.048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  23 in total

1.  More than a feeling: Pervasive influences of memory without awareness of retrieval.

Authors:  Joel L Voss; Heather D Lucas; Ken A Paller
Journal:  Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 3.065

2.  Recognition memory: adding a response deadline eliminates recollection but spares familiarity.

Authors:  Magdalena M Sauvage; Zachery Beer; Howard Eichenbaum
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2010-02-13       Impact factor: 2.460

3.  Experts' memory: an ERP study of perceptual expertise effects on encoding and recognition.

Authors:  Grit Herzmann; Tim Curran
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-04

4.  Event-related potentials during encoding: Comparing unitization to relational processing.

Authors:  Hsiao-Wei Tu; Emma E Alty; Rachel A Diana
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2017-05-08       Impact factor: 3.252

5.  Your favorite number is special (to you): Evidence for item-level differences in retrieval of information from numerals.

Authors:  Danielle S Dickson; Kara D Federmeier
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Many roads lead to recognition: electrophysiological correlates of familiarity derived from short-term masked repetition priming.

Authors:  Heather D Lucas; Jason R Taylor; Richard N Henson; Ken A Paller
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2012-08-06       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Identical versus conceptual repetition FN400 and parietal old/new ERP components occur during encoding and predict subsequent memory.

Authors:  Michael Griffin; Melissa DeWolf; Alexander Keinath; Xiaonan Liu; Lynne Reder
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2013-03-22       Impact factor: 3.252

8.  Manipulating letter fluency for words alters electrophysiological correlates of recognition memory.

Authors:  Heather D Lucas; Ken A Paller
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-07-19       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Separating the FN400 and N400 potentials across recognition memory experiments.

Authors:  Paweł Stróżak; Delora Abedzadeh; Tim Curran
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 3.252

10.  A within-subject ERP and fMRI investigation of orientation-specific recognition memory for pictures.

Authors:  Grit Herzmann; Mingwu Jin; Dietmar Cordes; Tim Curran
Journal:  Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2012-02-27       Impact factor: 3.065

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.