Literature DB >> 29799079

Forewarning of hypotensive events using a Bayesian artificial neural network in neurocritical care.

Rob Donald1, Tim Howells2, Ian Piper3, P Enblad4, P Nilsson4, I Chambers5, B Gregson6, G Citerio7, K Kiening8, J Neumann8, A Ragauskas9, J Sahuquillo10, R Sinnott11, A Stell12.   

Abstract

Traumatically brain injured (TBI) patients are at risk from secondary insults. Arterial hypotension, critically low blood pressure, is one of the most dangerous secondary insults and is related to poor outcome in patients. The overall aim of this study was to get proof of the concept that advanced statistical techniques (machine learning) are methods that are able to provide early warning of impending hypotensive events before they occur during neuro-critical care. A Bayesian artificial neural network (BANN) model predicting episodes of hypotension was developed using data from 104 patients selected from the BrainIT multi-center database. Arterial hypotension events were recorded and defined using the Edinburgh University Secondary Insult Grades (EUSIG) physiological adverse event scoring system. The BANN was trained on a random selection of 50% of the available patients (n = 52) and validated on the remaining cohort. A multi-center prospective pilot study (Phase 1, n = 30) was then conducted with the system running live in the clinical environment, followed by a second validation pilot study (Phase 2, n = 49). From these prospectively collected data, a final evaluation study was done on 69 of these patients with 10 patients excluded from the Phase 2 study because of insufficient or invalid data. Each data collection phase was a prospective non-interventional observational study conducted in a live clinical setting to test the data collection systems and the model performance. No prediction information was available to the clinical teams during a patient's stay in the ICU. The final cohort (n = 69), using a decision threshold of 0.4, and including false positive checks, gave a sensitivity of 39.3% (95% CI 32.9-46.1) and a specificity of 91.5% (95% CI 89.0-93.7). Using a decision threshold of 0.3, and false positive correction, gave a sensitivity of 46.6% (95% CI 40.1-53.2) and specificity of 85.6% (95% CI 82.3-88.8). With a decision threshold of 0.3, > 15 min warning of patient instability can be achieved. We have shown, using advanced machine learning techniques running in a live neuro-critical care environment, that it would be possible to give neurointensive teams early warning of potential hypotensive events before they emerge, allowing closer monitoring and earlier clinical assessment in an attempt to prevent the onset of hypotension. The multi-centre clinical infrastructure developed to support the clinical studies provides a solid base for further collaborative research on data quality, false positive correction and the display of early warning data in a clinical setting.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayesian prediction; Clinical study results; Neuro-intensive care; Traumatic brain injury

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29799079     DOI: 10.1007/s10877-018-0139-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput        ISSN: 1387-1307            Impact factor:   2.502


  17 in total

1.  A modification of Simon's optimal design for phase II trials when the criterion is median sample size.

Authors:  J J Hanfelt; R S Slack; E A Gehan
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1999-12

2.  Artificial neural networks improve the prediction of Kt/V, follow-up dietary protein intake and hypotension risk in haemodialysis patients.

Authors:  Luca Gabutti; Dario Vadilonga; Giorgio Mombelli; Michel Burnier; Claudio Marone
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2004-02-19       Impact factor: 5.992

3.  Predictors of hypotension after induction of general anesthesia.

Authors:  David L Reich; Sabera Hossain; Marina Krol; Bernard Baez; Puja Patel; Ariel Bernstein; Carol A Bodian
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 5.108

4.  Fast Fourier transforms as prophecy: predicting hypotension during spinal anesthesia.

Authors:  Richard Smiley
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 7.892

5.  Duration of hypotension before initiation of effective antimicrobial therapy is the critical determinant of survival in human septic shock.

Authors:  Anand Kumar; Daniel Roberts; Kenneth E Wood; Bruce Light; Joseph E Parrillo; Satendra Sharma; Robert Suppes; Daniel Feinstein; Sergio Zanotti; Leo Taiberg; David Gurka; Aseem Kumar; Mary Cheang
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 7.598

6.  Intraoperative hypotension and 1-year mortality after noncardiac surgery.

Authors:  Jilles B Bijker; Wilton A van Klei; Yvonne Vergouwe; Douglas J Eleveld; Leo van Wolfswinkel; Karel G M Moons; Cor J Kalkman
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 7.892

7.  The brain monitoring with Information Technology (BrainIT) collaborative network: EC feasibility study results and future direction.

Authors:  Ian Piper; Iain Chambers; Giuseppe Citerio; Per Enblad; Barbara Gregson; Tim Howells; Karl Kiening; Julia Mattern; Pelle Nilsson; Arminas Ragauskas; Juan Sahuquillo; Rob Donald; Richard Sinnott; Anthony Stell
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 2.216

8.  Predicting Acute Hypotensive Episodes: The 10th Annual PhysioNet/Computers in Cardiology Challenge.

Authors:  Gb Moody; Lh Lehman
Journal:  Comput Cardiol       Date:  2009

9.  Daily cost of an intensive care unit day: the contribution of mechanical ventilation.

Authors:  Joseph F Dasta; Trent P McLaughlin; Samir H Mody; Catherine Tak Piech
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 7.598

10.  Federating distributed clinical data for the prediction of adverse hypotensive events.

Authors:  Anthony Stell; Richard Sinnott; Jipu Jiang; Rob Donald; Iain Chambers; Giuseppe Citerio; Per Enblad; Barbara Gregson; Tim Howells; Karl Kiening; Pelle Nilsson; Arminas Ragauskas; Juan Sahuquillo; Ian Piper
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2009-07-13       Impact factor: 4.226

View more
  5 in total

1.  Diversity in Machine Learning: A Systematic Review of Text-Based Diagnostic Applications.

Authors:  Lane Fitzsimmons; Maya Dewan; Judith W Dexheimer
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 2.762

2.  A Machine Learning Approach for Predicting Real-time Risk of Intraoperative Hypotension in Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Shara I Feld; Daniel S Hippe; Ljubomir Miljacic; Nayak L Polissar; Shu-Fang Newman; Bala G Nair; Monica S Vavilala
Journal:  J Neurosurg Anesthesiol       Date:  2021-11-11       Impact factor: 3.969

Review 3.  Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing end of year summary 2019: hemodynamic monitoring and management.

Authors:  Bernd Saugel; Lester A H Critchley; Thomas Kaufmann; Moritz Flick; Karim Kouz; Simon T Vistisen; Thomas W L Scheeren
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2020-03-14       Impact factor: 2.502

4.  Evidence-based Clinical Decision Support Systems for the prediction and detection of three disease states in critical care: A systematic literature review.

Authors:  Goran Medic; Melodi Kosaner Kließ; Louis Atallah; Jochen Weichert; Saswat Panda; Maarten Postma; Amer El-Kerdi
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2019-10-08

Review 5.  Survival prediction of glioblastoma patients-are we there yet? A systematic review of prognostic modeling for glioblastoma and its clinical potential.

Authors:  Ishaan Ashwini Tewarie; Joeky T Senders; Stijn Kremer; Sharmila Devi; William B Gormley; Omar Arnaout; Timothy R Smith; Marike L D Broekman
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 3.042

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.