Literature DB >> 33156423

Survival prediction of glioblastoma patients-are we there yet? A systematic review of prognostic modeling for glioblastoma and its clinical potential.

Ishaan Ashwini Tewarie1,2,3, Joeky T Senders1,3, Stijn Kremer1, Sharmila Devi3,4, William B Gormley3, Omar Arnaout3, Timothy R Smith3, Marike L D Broekman5,6,7.   

Abstract

Glioblastoma is associated with a poor prognosis. Even though survival statistics are well-described at the population level, it remains challenging to predict the prognosis of an individual patient despite the increasing number of prognostic models. The aim of this study is to systematically review the literature on prognostic modeling in glioblastoma patients. A systematic literature search was performed to identify all relevant studies that developed a prognostic model for predicting overall survival in glioblastoma patients following the PRISMA guidelines. Participants, type of input, algorithm type, validation, and testing procedures were reviewed per prognostic model. Among 595 citations, 27 studies were included for qualitative review. The included studies developed and evaluated a total of 59 models, of which only seven were externally validated in a different patient cohort. The predictive performance among these studies varied widely according to the AUC (0.58-0.98), accuracy (0.69-0.98), and C-index (0.66-0.70). Three studies deployed their model as an online prediction tool, all of which were based on a statistical algorithm. The increasing performance of survival prediction models will aid personalized clinical decision-making in glioblastoma patients. The scientific realm is gravitating towards the use of machine learning models developed on high-dimensional data, often with promising results. However, none of these models has been implemented into clinical care. To facilitate the clinical implementation of high-performing survival prediction models, future efforts should focus on harmonizing data acquisition methods, improving model interpretability, and externally validating these models in multicentered, prospective fashion.
© 2020. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Glioblastoma; Neurosurgery; Overall survival; Prognostic modeling

Year:  2020        PMID: 33156423     DOI: 10.1007/s10143-020-01430-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurg Rev        ISSN: 0344-5607            Impact factor:   3.042


  57 in total

1.  Glioblastoma: clinical characteristics, prognostic factors and survival in 492 patients.

Authors:  Andreas M Stark; Julia van de Bergh; Jürgen Hedderich; H Maximilian Mehdorn; Arya Nabavi
Journal:  Clin Neurol Neurosurg       Date:  2012-02-27       Impact factor: 1.876

Review 2.  Glioblastoma and other malignant gliomas: a clinical review.

Authors:  Antonio Omuro; Lisa M DeAngelis
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Biologically inspired survival analysis based on integrating gene expression as mediator with genomic variants.

Authors:  Ibrahim Youssef; Robert Clarke; Ie-Ming Shih; Yue Wang; Guoqiang Yu
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 4.589

4.  Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors in patients with glioblastoma.

Authors:  Johannes Lutterbach; Willi Sauerbrei; Roland Guttenberger
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.621

5.  PROBAST: A Tool to Assess the Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies.

Authors:  Robert F Wolff; Karel G M Moons; Richard D Riley; Penny F Whiting; Marie Westwood; Gary S Collins; Johannes B Reitsma; Jos Kleijnen; Sue Mallett
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Critical appraisal and data extraction for systematic reviews of prediction modelling studies: the CHARMS checklist.

Authors:  Karel G M Moons; Joris A H de Groot; Walter Bouwmeester; Yvonne Vergouwe; Susan Mallett; Douglas G Altman; Johannes B Reitsma; Gary S Collins
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 11.069

7.  A Meta-Analysis of Survival Outcomes Following Reoperation in Recurrent Glioblastoma: Time to Consider the Timing of Reoperation.

Authors:  Yu-Hang Zhao; Ze-Fen Wang; Zhi-Yong Pan; Dominik Péus; Juan Delgado-Fernandez; Johan Pallud; Zhi-Qiang Li
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2019-03-26       Impact factor: 4.003

8.  Prognostic models based on imaging findings in glioblastoma: Human versus Machine.

Authors:  David Molina-García; Luis Vera-Ramírez; Julián Pérez-Beteta; Estanislao Arana; Víctor M Pérez-García
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-04-12       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Evaluation of pseudoprogression in patients with glioblastoma.

Authors:  Michael Jonathan Kucharczyk; Sameer Parpia; Anthony Whitton; Jeffrey Noah Greenspoon
Journal:  Neurooncol Pract       Date:  2016-11-04

10.  A Risk Classification System With Five-Gene for Survival Prediction of Glioblastoma Patients.

Authors:  Yulin Wang; Xin Liu; Gefei Guan; Weijiang Zhao; Minghua Zhuang
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2019-07-16       Impact factor: 4.003

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Gaps and Opportunities of Artificial Intelligence Applications for Pediatric Oncology in European Research: A Systematic Review of Reviews and a Bibliometric Analysis.

Authors:  Alberto Eugenio Tozzi; Francesco Fabozzi; Megan Eckley; Ileana Croci; Vito Andrea Dell'Anna; Erica Colantonio; Angela Mastronuzzi
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 5.738

2.  Four specific biomarkers associated with the progression of glioblastoma multiforme in older adults identified using weighted gene co-expression network analysis.

Authors:  Yushi Yang; Liangzhao Chu; Zhirui Zeng; Shu Xu; Hua Yang; Xuelin Zhang; Jun Jia; Niya Long; Yaxin Hu; Jian Liu
Journal:  Bioengineered       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 3.269

Review 3.  Clinical Applications and Anticancer Effects of Antimicrobial Peptides: From Bench to Bedside.

Authors:  Ameneh Jafari; Amirhesam Babajani; Ramin Sarrami Forooshani; Mohsen Yazdani; Mostafa Rezaei-Tavirani
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 6.244

4.  A Novel Extracellular Matrix Gene-Based Prognostic Model to Predict Overall Survive in Patients With Glioblastoma.

Authors:  Chen Qian; Wu Xiufu; Tang Jianxun; Chen Zihao; Shi Wenjie; Tang Jingfeng; Ulf D Kahlert; Du Renfei
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 4.772

5.  Construction of an immune-related gene signature for the prognosis and diagnosis of glioblastoma multiforme.

Authors:  Ziye Yu; Huan Yang; Kun Song; Pengfei Fu; Jingjing Shen; Ming Xu; Hongzhi Xu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-08-02       Impact factor: 5.738

6.  Design, Synthesis and Activity of New N1-Alkyl Tryptophan Functionalized Dendrimeric Peptides against Glioblastoma.

Authors:  Marta Sowińska; Monika Szeliga; Maja Morawiak; Barbara Zabłocka; Zofia Urbanczyk-Lipkowska
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2022-08-13

7.  Synthetic MRI improves radiomics-based glioblastoma survival prediction.

Authors:  Elisa Moya-Sáez; Rafael Navarro-González; Santiago Cepeda; Ángel Pérez-Núñez; Rodrigo de Luis-García; Santiago Aja-Fernández; Carlos Alberola-López
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2022-05-21       Impact factor: 4.478

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.